Ichigo 100% > I"s

TheGiftedMonkey · Post by **TheGiftedMonkey** » Wed Jan 03, 2007 4:36 pm

The character depth is pretty massive. It really makes you feel for all the characters. I was actually pretty sad at the end because he had to choose one.

Dan · Post by **Dan** » Wed Jan 03, 2007 4:57 pm

WTF are you smoking? I''s is way better! The Ichigo 100% main guy was such a idiot! And the story felt so weak when it just brought Nishino back in with the bakery. If he was a real dude, I would beat him to pulp for making all the other girls so sad. He was like what Seto in I''s imagined himself to be - a total man 'ho.

Total fan service on that ending.

Umiman · Post by **Umiman** » Wed Jan 03, 2007 5:37 pm

...

...

...

...

...

This feels like the time someone told me literature is only comprised of 100 year old books like Shakespear.

TheGiftedMonkey · Post by **TheGiftedMonkey** » Wed Jan 03, 2007 5:58 pm

Oy! I still think it was a better story. I honestly didn't like the ending though. I's ending was way better and I'll give respect to that. Both are great IMO but I liked Ichigo a bit more.

Armanewb · Post by **Armanewb** » Wed Jan 03, 2007 6:58 pm

Err...

Manaka is the biggest idiot of a main character I've seen so far, and I've read a lot of manga. So, no I''s > Ichigo

cotton · Post by **cotton** » Wed Jan 03, 2007 8:03 pm

TheGiftedMonkey wrote:The character depth is pretty massive. It really makes you feel for all the characters. I was actually pretty sad at the end because he had to choose one.

Character depth? In Ichigo?

Every chapter was the exactly the same. Some girl told him she liked him, he made a funny face. Rinse. Wash. Repeat.

Umiman wrote:This feels like the time someone told me literature is only comprised of 100 year old books like Shakespear.

Someone told you Shakespeare was a 100 year old book?

Umiman, you are officially banned from the Internet.

Umiman · Post by **Umiman** » Thu Jan 04, 2007 2:56 am

Because I misspelt Shakespeare's name?

Post by **BaKaFiSh** » Thu Jan 04, 2007 10:18 am

Because Shakespeare was a poet/author, not a book..>.>

And I disagree with the topic too...xD

typhonsentra · Post by **typhonsentra** » Thu Jan 04, 2007 10:25 am

Well Shakespeare COULD'VE been alive 100 years ago. None of us were actually there to check!

TheGiftedMonkey · Post by **TheGiftedMonkey** » Thu Jan 04, 2007 10:41 am

BaKaFiSh wrote:Because Shakespeare was a poet/author, not a book..>.>

And I agree with the topic too...=P

Thank you! /bows

Umiman · Post by **Umiman** » Thu Jan 04, 2007 5:33 pm

Gah! Sorry for my mistaken use of nongrammatical English then! But you get what I mean.

EDIT: WAIIIIT.... hang on a sec... I'm pretty damn sure using a famous poet / writer as a descriptive noun is acceptable.

EDIT 2: Ah... I forgot the -ean. And that's what makes the difference. Sorry, my bad.

cotton · Post by **cotton** » Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:47 pm

Umiman wrote:Gah! Sorry for my mistaken use of nongrammatical English then! But you get what I mean.

EDIT: WAIIIIT.... hang on a sec... I'm pretty damn sure using a famous poet / writer as a descriptive noun is acceptable.

EDIT 2: Ah... I forgot the -ean. And that's what makes the difference. Sorry, my bad.

[1] Shakespeare was a writer, not book.
[2] He was alive 400 years ago, not 100 (That's one hell of a rounding error)
[3] "ean" wouldn't help.
[4] I like your signature!
[5] Ichigo 100% > I''s
[6] ... err
[7] That's it!

TheGiftedMonkey · Post by **TheGiftedMonkey** » Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:51 pm

cotton wrote:
Umiman wrote:Gah! Sorry for my mistaken use of nongrammatical English then! But you get what I mean.

EDIT: WAIIIIT.... hang on a sec... I'm pretty damn sure using a famous poet / writer as a descriptive noun is acceptable.

EDIT 2: Ah... I forgot the -ean. And that's what makes the difference. Sorry, my bad.
[1] Shakespeare was a writer, not book.
[2] He was alive 400 years ago, not 100
[3] "ean" wouldn't help.
[4] I like your signature!
[5] Ichigo 100% > I''s
[6] ... err
[7] That's it!

Rape!

Umiman · Post by **Umiman** » Thu Jan 04, 2007 10:00 pm

@Cotton

I. Whoop de doo, I already settled that. Said sorry, remember?
II. I didn't say that, my friend did.
III. old books like that of Shakespearean. That's plenty good enough. This is the intarnet (delibrately spelt wrong, you elitist bastards), you don't see me bitching about other people's grammar now do you?
IV. Thank you. It's so hard to work with the 200 character limit.
VI. No comment.
VII. Yup.
VIII. This feels like Final Fantasy.

EDIT: oy, f-r-i-e-n-d does not equal Tsuruya!

TheGiftedMonkey · Post by **TheGiftedMonkey** » Thu Jan 04, 2007 10:02 pm

Umiman wrote:@Cotton

I. Whoop de doo, I already settled that. Said sorry, remember?
II. I didn't say that, my Tsuruya did.
III. old books like that of Shakespearean. That's plenty good enough. This is the intarnet (delibrately spelt wrong, you elitist Itsuki), you don't see me Mikuru about other people's grammar now do you?
IV. Thank you. It's so hard to work with the 200 character limit.
VI. No comment.
VII. Yup.
VIII. This feels like Final Fantasy.

EDIT: oy, f-r-i-e-n-d does not equal Tsuruya!

Omg I love the text filter.

ばか！バカ！　馬鹿ー月！

Ichigo 100% > I"s

Ichigo 100% > I"s

Re: Ichigo 100% > I"s