Mahesvara wrote:I got from the paragraph that the person conducting the guiding of students always belongs to the student council. Therefore since he confirmed that he was guiding students he had to be in the student council, making the negitive make no sense and contridict what is being said
If someone could give a RAW check on the lines then, it would be appreciated. Because taking out the negative makes these parts of the lines nonsense:
Thus, she shouldn't have been able to conclude that he was an officer of the Student Council just from his answer, but Tatsuya did not say anything to refute the happily giggling Mayumi at all. He had, in fact, joined the Student Council, and another matter had caught his attention.
To refute something means to disprove it, meaning the line without the negative (to condense it) will read as "She should have been able to conclude that he was a Student Council officer just from his answer, but Tatsuya did not say anything to disprove Mayumi's conclusion."
That does not make any sense in English. Especially when you include the information before stating that the Public Morals Committee people and temporary officers were also out and about making their rounds, as the implication is that he could have been one of those two and had made a successful argument.
As far as I can tell though, these lines are some time after Page 133. :/