Talk:Hidan no Aria:Volume6 Chapter1 - Revision history

YoakeNoHikari at 19:24, 3 May 2011

2011-05-03T19:24:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:24, 3 May 2011
Line 14:		Line 14:
	Update: That range is utter BS. The SVD's effective range is rated at 800 m, while even with a scope pushing its limits to 1,300 m. Genius or not, its a limitation of the equipment. At 2000m the bullet simply falls out of the sky and/or doesn't have any stopping power left. That doesn't even take into account environmental factors. /rantoff [[User:Fishsandwich\|Fishsandwich]] 18:38, 2 May 2011 (???)		Update: That range is utter BS. The SVD's effective range is rated at 800 m, while even with a scope pushing its limits to 1,300 m. Genius or not, its a limitation of the equipment. At 2000m the bullet simply falls out of the sky and/or doesn't have any stopping power left. That doesn't even take into account environmental factors. /rantoff [[User:Fishsandwich\|Fishsandwich]] 18:38, 2 May 2011 (???)

	Rather than telling us, please tell the author: We will put what the author writes. - [[User:YoakeNoHikari\|YoakeNoHikari]] 19:23, 3 May 2011 (UCT)		Rather than telling us, please tell the author: We will put what the author writes. Actually, the Chinese raws say SVD, though I'm not sure why. I can't really remember if 'twas mentioned in the novel before. At any rate, raws use Dragunov, so I'm using that. Thank you. - [[User:YoakeNoHikari\|YoakeNoHikari]] 19:23, 3 May 2011 (UCT)

YoakeNoHikari at 19:23, 3 May 2011

2011-05-03T19:23:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:23, 3 May 2011
Line 13:		Line 13:
	The SVD is is one of the Dragunov's many variants. Its purpose was never really for sniping, as is obvious by many of its features (rifling, bayonet, semi-auto, etc). It was designed as a designated marksman rifle that was cheap and durable. It is not really a sniper's weapon, but I suppose the reason the author chose this rifle is because it it very iconic. As it was cheap and mass produced, it saw wide usage when compared to other "sniper" rifles of the era and thus wider appeal. It just irks me a bit to see Reki constantly being referred to as a genius of sniping and the author touting the praises of the rifle, when the reality of this weapon is significantly different. I mean basically it was given to a squad of grunts using AK-47s (whose drop off range is not so great) where the one with a little better aim than the rest was supposed to use it.		The SVD is is one of the Dragunov's many variants. Its purpose was never really for sniping, as is obvious by many of its features (rifling, bayonet, semi-auto, etc). It was designed as a designated marksman rifle that was cheap and durable. It is not really a sniper's weapon, but I suppose the reason the author chose this rifle is because it it very iconic. As it was cheap and mass produced, it saw wide usage when compared to other "sniper" rifles of the era and thus wider appeal. It just irks me a bit to see Reki constantly being referred to as a genius of sniping and the author touting the praises of the rifle, when the reality of this weapon is significantly different. I mean basically it was given to a squad of grunts using AK-47s (whose drop off range is not so great) where the one with a little better aim than the rest was supposed to use it.
	Update: That range is utter BS. The SVD's effective range is rated at 800 m, while even with a scope pushing its limits to 1,300 m. Genius or not, its a limitation of the equipment. At 2000m the bullet simply falls out of the sky and/or doesn't have any stopping power left. That doesn't even take into account environmental factors. /rantoff [[User:Fishsandwich\|Fishsandwich]] 18:38, 2 May 2011 (???)		Update: That range is utter BS. The SVD's effective range is rated at 800 m, while even with a scope pushing its limits to 1,300 m. Genius or not, its a limitation of the equipment. At 2000m the bullet simply falls out of the sky and/or doesn't have any stopping power left. That doesn't even take into account environmental factors. /rantoff [[User:Fishsandwich\|Fishsandwich]] 18:38, 2 May 2011 (???)

			Rather than telling us, please tell the author: We will put what the author writes. - [[User:YoakeNoHikari\|YoakeNoHikari]] 19:23, 3 May 2011 (UCT)

Fishsandwich at 18:31, 3 May 2011

2011-05-03T18:31:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:31, 3 May 2011
Line 11:		Line 11:
	Informative Note about the SVD:		Informative Note about the SVD:

	The SVD is is one of the Dragunov's many variants. Its purpose was never really for sniping, as is obvious by many of its features (rifling, bayonet, semi-auto, etc). It was designed as a designated marksman rifle that was cheap and durable. It is not really a sniper's weapon, but I suppose the reason the author chose this rifle is because it it very iconic. As it was cheap and mass produced, it saw wide usage when compared to other "sniper" rifles of the era and thus wider appeal. It just irks me a bit to see Reki constantly being referred to as a genius of sniping and the author touting the praises of the rifle, when the reality of this weapon is significantly different. I mean basically it was given to a squad of grunts using AK-47s (whose drop off range is not so great) where the one with a little better aim than the rest was supposed to use it. [[User:Fishsandwich\|Fishsandwich]] 18:38, 2 May 2011 (???)		The SVD is is one of the Dragunov's many variants. Its purpose was never really for sniping, as is obvious by many of its features (rifling, bayonet, semi-auto, etc). It was designed as a designated marksman rifle that was cheap and durable. It is not really a sniper's weapon, but I suppose the reason the author chose this rifle is because it it very iconic. As it was cheap and mass produced, it saw wide usage when compared to other "sniper" rifles of the era and thus wider appeal. It just irks me a bit to see Reki constantly being referred to as a genius of sniping and the author touting the praises of the rifle, when the reality of this weapon is significantly different. I mean basically it was given to a squad of grunts using AK-47s (whose drop off range is not so great) where the one with a little better aim than the rest was supposed to use it.
			Update: That range is utter BS. The SVD's effective range is rated at 800 m, while even with a scope pushing its limits to 1,300 m. Genius or not, its a limitation of the equipment. At 2000m the bullet simply falls out of the sky and/or doesn't have any stopping power left. That doesn't even take into account environmental factors. /rantoff [[User:Fishsandwich\|Fishsandwich]] 18:38, 2 May 2011 (???)

Zero2001 at 22:41, 2 May 2011

2011-05-02T22:41:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:41, 2 May 2011
Line 11:		Line 11:
	Informative Note about the SVD:		Informative Note about the SVD:

	The SVD is is one of the Dragunov's many variants. Its purpose was never really for sniping, as is obvious by many of its features (rifling, bayonet, semi-auto, etc). It was designed as a designated marksman rifle that was cheap and durable. It is not really a sniper's weapon, but I suppose the reason the author chose this rifle is because it it very iconic. As it was cheap and mass produced, it saw wide usage when compared to other "sniper" rifles of the era and thus wider appeal. It just irks me a bit to see Reki constantly being referred to as a genius of sniping and the author touting the praises of the rifle, when the reality of this weapon is significantly different. I mean basically it was given to a squad of grunts using AK-47s (whose drop off range is not so great) where the one with a little better aim than the rest was supposed to use it. [[User:Fishsandwich\|Fishsandwich]] 18:38, 2 May 2011		The SVD is is one of the Dragunov's many variants. Its purpose was never really for sniping, as is obvious by many of its features (rifling, bayonet, semi-auto, etc). It was designed as a designated marksman rifle that was cheap and durable. It is not really a sniper's weapon, but I suppose the reason the author chose this rifle is because it it very iconic. As it was cheap and mass produced, it saw wide usage when compared to other "sniper" rifles of the era and thus wider appeal. It just irks me a bit to see Reki constantly being referred to as a genius of sniping and the author touting the praises of the rifle, when the reality of this weapon is significantly different. I mean basically it was given to a squad of grunts using AK-47s (whose drop off range is not so great) where the one with a little better aim than the rest was supposed to use it. [[User:Fishsandwich\|Fishsandwich]] 18:38, 2 May 2011 (???)

Zero2001: Adding reference to user who posted this message, crosschecked with history

2011-05-02T22:40:44Z

Adding reference to user who posted this message, crosschecked with history

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:40, 2 May 2011
Line 11:		Line 11:
	Informative Note about the SVD:		Informative Note about the SVD:

	The SVD is is one of the Dragunov's many variants. Its purpose was never really for sniping, as is obvious by many of its features (rifling, bayonet, semi-auto, etc). It was designed as a designated marksman rifle that was cheap and durable. It is not really a sniper's weapon, but I suppose the reason the author chose this rifle is because it it very iconic. As it was cheap and mass produced, it saw wide usage when compared to other "sniper" rifles of the era and thus wider appeal. It just irks me a bit to see Reki constantly being referred to as a genius of sniping and the author touting the praises of the rifle, when the reality of this weapon is significantly different. I mean basically it was given to a squad of grunts using AK-47s (whose drop off range is not so great) where the one with a little better aim than the rest was supposed to use it.		The SVD is is one of the Dragunov's many variants. Its purpose was never really for sniping, as is obvious by many of its features (rifling, bayonet, semi-auto, etc). It was designed as a designated marksman rifle that was cheap and durable. It is not really a sniper's weapon, but I suppose the reason the author chose this rifle is because it it very iconic. As it was cheap and mass produced, it saw wide usage when compared to other "sniper" rifles of the era and thus wider appeal. It just irks me a bit to see Reki constantly being referred to as a genius of sniping and the author touting the praises of the rifle, when the reality of this weapon is significantly different. I mean basically it was given to a squad of grunts using AK-47s (whose drop off range is not so great) where the one with a little better aim than the rest was supposed to use it. [[User:Fishsandwich\|Fishsandwich]] 18:38, 2 May 2011

Fishsandwich at 18:38, 2 May 2011

2011-05-02T18:38:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:38, 2 May 2011
Line 7:		Line 7:

	Though it's in Turkish, it's also in Mongolian, and in this context with Reki, it's rather 'Mongolian'. [[User:Kira0802\|Kira0802]] 13:23, 30 April 2011 (UCT)		Though it's in Turkish, it's also in Mongolian, and in this context with Reki, it's rather 'Mongolian'. [[User:Kira0802\|Kira0802]] 13:23, 30 April 2011 (UCT)


			Informative Note about the SVD:

			The SVD is is one of the Dragunov's many variants. Its purpose was never really for sniping, as is obvious by many of its features (rifling, bayonet, semi-auto, etc). It was designed as a designated marksman rifle that was cheap and durable. It is not really a sniper's weapon, but I suppose the reason the author chose this rifle is because it it very iconic. As it was cheap and mass produced, it saw wide usage when compared to other "sniper" rifles of the era and thus wider appeal. It just irks me a bit to see Reki constantly being referred to as a genius of sniping and the author touting the praises of the rifle, when the reality of this weapon is significantly different. I mean basically it was given to a squad of grunts using AK-47s (whose drop off range is not so great) where the one with a little better aim than the rest was supposed to use it.

Kira0802 at 13:23, 30 April 2011

2011-04-30T13:23:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:23, 30 April 2011
Line 4:		Line 4:

	source:http://www.zargan.com/sozluk.asp?Sozcuk=ulus		source:http://www.zargan.com/sozluk.asp?Sozcuk=ulus


			Though it's in Turkish, it's also in Mongolian, and in this context with Reki, it's rather 'Mongolian'. [[User:Kira0802\|Kira0802]] 13:23, 30 April 2011 (UCT)

Hariseldon: Created page with " ''Ulus'' is a word from ancient Turkish.It's meanings are; nation, people, country, commonwealth of a nation source:http://www.zargan.com/sozluk.asp?Sozcuk=ulus"

2011-04-30T13:19:21Z

Created page with " ''Ulus'' is a word from ancient Turkish.It's meanings are; nation, people, country, commonwealth of a nation source:http://www.zargan.com/sozluk.asp?Sozcuk=ulus"

New page

''Ulus'' is a word from ancient Turkish.It's meanings are;

nation, people, country, commonwealth of a nation

source:http://www.zargan.com/sozluk.asp?Sozcuk=ulus