User talk:Trev lite - Revision history

Trev lite at 03:17, 24 August 2014

2014-08-24T03:17:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:17, 24 August 2014
Line 71:		Line 71:

	Hi, could you move your extra talk page to a place under your user namespace. For example, User:Trev_lite/"something" --[[User:KuroiHikari\|KuroiHikari]] ([[User_talk:KuroiHikari\|Talk]] \| ) 20:15, 23 August 2014 (CDT)		Hi, could you move your extra talk page to a place under your user namespace. For example, User:Trev_lite/"something" --[[User:KuroiHikari\|KuroiHikari]] ([[User_talk:KuroiHikari\|Talk]] \| ) 20:15, 23 August 2014 (CDT)

			woops. i thought it was under my namespace. i will fix this asap. --[[User:Trev lite\|Trev lite]] ([[User talk:Trev lite#top\|talk]]) 22:17, 23 August 2014 (CDT)

KuroiHikari: /* Misuse of namespace */ new section

2014-08-24T01:15:25Z

Misuse of namespace: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:15, 24 August 2014
Line 67:		Line 67:
	I am just making sure the name is consistent. The name Grayrat is only used in a few chapters. Since the name of Greyrat is used in most chapters and is on the Terminology page, i will be converting to Greyrat.		I am just making sure the name is consistent. The name Grayrat is only used in a few chapters. Since the name of Greyrat is used in most chapters and is on the Terminology page, i will be converting to Greyrat.
	--[[User:Trev lite\|Trev lite]] ([[User talk:Trev lite#top\|talk]]) 14:43, 6 August 2014 (CDT)		--[[User:Trev lite\|Trev lite]] ([[User talk:Trev lite#top\|talk]]) 14:43, 6 August 2014 (CDT)

			== Misuse of namespace ==

			Hi, could you move your extra talk page to a place under your user namespace. For example, User:Trev_lite/"something" --[[User:KuroiHikari\|KuroiHikari]] ([[User_talk:KuroiHikari\|Talk]] \| ) 20:15, 23 August 2014 (CDT)

Trev lite: /* * Grayrat to Greyrat */

2014-08-06T19:43:00Z

* Grayrat to Greyrat

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:43, 6 August 2014
Line 64:		Line 64:

	The standard for this project is American English (which I personally hate, btw), so could you explain the reasoning behind this? [[User:Vanant\|Vanant]] ([[User talk:Vanant\|talk]]) 06:06, 6 August 2014 (CDT)		The standard for this project is American English (which I personally hate, btw), so could you explain the reasoning behind this? [[User:Vanant\|Vanant]] ([[User talk:Vanant\|talk]]) 06:06, 6 August 2014 (CDT)

			I am just making sure the name is consistent. The name Grayrat is only used in a few chapters. Since the name of Greyrat is used in most chapters and is on the Terminology page, i will be converting to Greyrat.
			--[[User:Trev lite\|Trev lite]] ([[User talk:Trev lite#top\|talk]]) 14:43, 6 August 2014 (CDT)

Trev lite: /* ""s and []s */

2014-08-06T19:40:29Z

""s and []s

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:40, 6 August 2014
Line 57:		Line 57:

	[[User:Vanant\|Vanant]] ([[User talk:Vanant\|talk]]) 06:05, 6 August 2014 (CDT)		[[User:Vanant\|Vanant]] ([[User talk:Vanant\|talk]]) 06:05, 6 August 2014 (CDT)


			I will no be doing any changes to ""s and []s for a while. I am not sure i will have it in me to do the monstrous task of changing all of the chapters to the new standard for quotations. --[[User:Trev lite\|Trev lite]] ([[User talk:Trev lite#top\|talk]]) 14:40, 6 August 2014 (CDT)

	== * Grayrat to Greyrat ==		== * Grayrat to Greyrat ==

	The standard for this project is American English (which I personally hate, btw), so could you explain the reasoning behind this? [[User:Vanant\|Vanant]] ([[User talk:Vanant\|talk]]) 06:06, 6 August 2014 (CDT)		The standard for this project is American English (which I personally hate, btw), so could you explain the reasoning behind this? [[User:Vanant\|Vanant]] ([[User talk:Vanant\|talk]]) 06:06, 6 August 2014 (CDT)

Trev lite: /* Shishou */

2014-08-06T19:34:42Z

Shishou

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:34, 6 August 2014
Line 35:		Line 35:

	[[User:Vanant\|Vanant]] ([[User talk:Vanant\|talk]]) 06:00, 6 August 2014 (CDT)		[[User:Vanant\|Vanant]] ([[User talk:Vanant\|talk]]) 06:00, 6 August 2014 (CDT)


			I am actually all for adding the u to shisho(u)
			For now i will stop my convertion of Shishou into master.
			If asked i will revert Master back to Shishou.
			--[[User:Trev lite\|Trev lite]] ([[User talk:Trev lite#top\|talk]]) 14:34, 6 August 2014 (CDT)

	== ""s and []s ==		== ""s and []s ==

Vanant: /* * Grayrat to Greyrat */ new section

2014-08-06T11:06:45Z

* Grayrat to Greyrat: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:06, 6 August 2014
Line 51:		Line 51:

	[[User:Vanant\|Vanant]] ([[User talk:Vanant\|talk]]) 06:05, 6 August 2014 (CDT)		[[User:Vanant\|Vanant]] ([[User talk:Vanant\|talk]]) 06:05, 6 August 2014 (CDT)

			== * Grayrat to Greyrat ==

			The standard for this project is American English (which I personally hate, btw), so could you explain the reasoning behind this? [[User:Vanant\|Vanant]] ([[User talk:Vanant\|talk]]) 06:06, 6 August 2014 (CDT)

Vanant: /* ""s and []s */ new section

2014-08-06T11:05:42Z

""s and []s: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:05, 6 August 2014
Line 35:		Line 35:

	[[User:Vanant\|Vanant]] ([[User talk:Vanant\|talk]]) 06:00, 6 August 2014 (CDT)		[[User:Vanant\|Vanant]] ([[User talk:Vanant\|talk]]) 06:00, 6 August 2014 (CDT)

			== ""s and []s ==

			SilentWolfie did this for his own tastes, but the raw Japanese use the completely normal 「」 quotations marks that you'd find anywhere else.

			It's simply normal "".

			One thing that should be noted (and is absent from Kaito's chapters due to his romaaji machine) is that chapters where they speak different languages make a distinction with the speech marks.

			When speaking in the language that isn't the main one for the scene, he'll use 『』 instead. I've used these as well, but you might prefer to use [] in its place.

			Anyway, as I mentioned just now, this factor is absent from Kaito's translations due to his machine, and someone will have to go add this distinction back in. Some notable examples where they use different speech marks are during the Japanese and Human language scene with Nanahoshi, Rudy and Sylphy (their first meeting).

			Volume 12's conversations with the Battle God Language and Elinalise's Human Race Language also make such a distinction (two such conversations are the one they have after saving the merchant, and the one where she scolds a warrior).

			[[User:Vanant\|Vanant]] ([[User talk:Vanant\|talk]]) 06:05, 6 August 2014 (CDT)

Vanant: /* Shishou */ new section

2014-08-06T11:00:39Z

Shishou: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:00, 6 August 2014
Line 23:		Line 23:

	Your Welcome. If there are more names to update please ask me here or on the terminology talk page. --[[User:Trev lite\|Trev lite]] ([[User talk:Trev lite\|talk]]) 14:05, 4 August 2014 (CDT)		Your Welcome. If there are more names to update please ask me here or on the terminology talk page. --[[User:Trev lite\|Trev lite]] ([[User talk:Trev lite\|talk]]) 14:05, 4 August 2014 (CDT)

			== Shishou ==

			First of all, I don't see why there's a need to remove the 'u' like Kaito sometimes does.

			Second of all, I've already discussed this issue with Kaito in the past (roughly 2-3 weeks ago).

			Though I previously translated it as 'master' as it carries more or less the same connotations in English that shishou does in Japanese, Kaito brought to my attention the fact that Julie uses the terms 'grandmaster' and 'master', so the two of us agreed that to make a distinction, 'Shishou' would be used.

			At any rate, as a term that could be used in martial arts, it's not really too different from the specialised term 'sensei', and I don't think the readers will have a problem. Cheers.

			[[User:Vanant\|Vanant]] ([[User talk:Vanant\|talk]]) 06:00, 6 August 2014 (CDT)

Trev lite at 10:37, 6 August 2014

2014-08-06T10:37:39Z

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == Mushoku Tensei ==
 Dear Trev Lite,
@@ Line 12: / Line 17: @@
 Onizuka-GTO 01:33, 3 August 2014 (CDT)

Onizuka-gto: /* Mushoku Tensei */ new section

2014-08-03T06:33:58Z

Mushoku Tensei: new section

New page

== Mushoku Tensei ==

Dear Trev Lite,

Thank you for your contribution, for enquires about what is protocol regarding the names and terminology.
What you see on the name and terminology project specific guidelines,
is the currently accepted forms that when and if there is a conflict of such issue, the ones on that page shall prevail until such point that the project teams agrees in mutual consensus that a change to any on the list should be different.

Once again, thank you for your contribution.

Best Regards,

Onizuka-GTO 01:33, 3 August 2014 (CDT)