ばか！バカ！　馬鹿ー月！

I do not think that is it...

Maybe because you can't feel any sincerity in it?

Then explain, A-kun.

ben is fairly close; that, and the fact that you are a pronounced lolicon that likes make Takanashi-like excuses.

That's all part of my "I really don't care" thing.

Are you saying that being a lolicon is a bad thing? (Don't be one of those guys that thinks lolicon = pedophilia. )

I do not think that lolicon is equivalent to pedophilia, but the line between the two is very slim. It can be the difference between being a closet pervert and an open door pervert in a sense, but that does not mean that all lolicons are perverts.

Makes sense. That is probably the best way I've heard someone looking at it for quite some time.

hobogunner wrote:(Don't be one of those guys that thinks lolicon = pedophilia. )

To be honest, in the real world, we do not make the difference.

I know Kira, which makes me sad.

Though technically, isn't a lolicon someone who loves underage girls?

See, this is where it gets tricky, and really depends on simply how you view it.

Completely 100% definition wise, yes, a lolicon is someone with an attraction to young girls (pre-pubescent [9-14], pubescent, and post-pubescent).

So isn't it the same thing then?

Not necessarily. Whenever one says "loli" they generally think 2D, when someone says "pedo" they think 3D. (To knowledgeable people.) However, most people view "loli" = "pedo" = 3D. So, it just all depends on who you're talking to on whether it's the same thing.

Though in Japan, a lolicon is a pedo, right?

No idea. In the culture here, yes, they are equal for some random reason. (I don't hold them equal, but many do.)