<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.baka-tsuki.org/project/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=128.72.16.141</id>
	<title>Baka-Tsuki - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.baka-tsuki.org/project/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=128.72.16.141"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.baka-tsuki.org/project/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/128.72.16.141"/>
	<updated>2026-05-10T06:18:00Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.1</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.baka-tsuki.org/project/index.php?title=User_talk:SinsI&amp;diff=239007</id>
		<title>User talk:SinsI</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.baka-tsuki.org/project/index.php?title=User_talk:SinsI&amp;diff=239007"/>
		<updated>2013-04-03T09:51:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;128.72.16.141: /* &amp;quot;incorrect which&amp;quot; */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==High School DxD==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You don&#039;t really have to edit them part by part, you can edit the whole chapter if you click the edit tab at the top of the page. Also, you really don&#039;t need to change all the &amp;quot;which&#039;s&amp;quot; into &amp;quot;that&#039;s&amp;quot; since they aren&#039;t wrong, so basically it comes down to an individual&#039;s preferences. Use that with restrictive clauses, but keep which with non-restrictive clauses.--[[User:Hiro Hayase|Hiro Hayase]] 14:18, 3 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please look over your changes and fix them, otherwise I might have to rollback everything at once. --[[User:Hiro Hayase|Hiro Hayase]] 14:21, 3 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I edit part by part because there are actually &amp;quot;which&#039;s&amp;quot; that are correct, and it gets tedious searching through the text again (maybe it is my browser, but after I edit the text search is reset back to the top of the text). And it reduces the risk of losing all the edits. Although copying to a notepad and doing it all there at once might be a better choice... 	&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for &amp;quot;restrictive - non-restrictive&amp;quot;, it seems that Code-Zero is not very proficient with that particular rule, so he makes a lot of mistakes with them. Everything I changed is exactly following that rule.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I use  http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/which-versus-that.aspx as a guideline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alright then, I was a bit concerned if you were using find&amp;amp;replace to make those changes without first reading the sentences. Yes, that is a good site.--[[User:Hiro Hayase|Hiro Hayase]] 14:52, 3 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi. Just wanted to tell you that in Volume 11 Life 1, the reading remains in past tense even if some of the words are in present tense. It doesn&#039;t read correctly unless some words are in present tense. I&#039;m going to change back those words, but I won&#039;t change anything else. Also there is still a mix between present and past tense in your edit. Do you want me to change it all to past tense? Dan1023 14:56, June 8, 2012&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Dress Boku==&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks very much for the edits! I&#039;ve learnt a lot from my mistakes (no exaggeration)! I hope you&#039;ll continue to help the project, although I might not update it regularly.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Pudding321|Pudding321]] 06:14, 18 February 2013 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;incorrect which&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think several of the uses of &amp;quot;which&amp;quot; you&#039;ve edited out are completely valid, and in some cases actually preferable. For example, in your last edit, the original &amp;quot;clubs which didn&#039;t require magic&amp;quot; should be perfectly fine. If you claim this is incorrect, perhaps you&#039;re referring to the outdated and incorrect grammar rule seen in some places that claimed &amp;quot;which&amp;quot; could not be used in restrictive clauses?&lt;br /&gt;
[[Anon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;quot;While some writers seem to have abandoned the distinction entirely, no better rule has come along to replace the traditional rule. &amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
 http://www.kentlaw.edu/academics/lrw/grinker/LwtaThat_Versus_Which.htm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Furthermore, the &amp;quot;that&amp;quot; rule is more in use in American English, and Baka-Tsuki tend to favor that version, given the requirement to use a specific AE dictionary... &lt;br /&gt;
http://stancarey.wordpress.com/2011/10/18/that-which-is-restrictive/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since there are far too many &amp;quot;which&amp;quot;-&amp;quot;that&amp;quot; errors (in which &amp;quot;which&amp;quot; is &amp;quot;an awkward grammar&amp;quot;), I assume the choice on the translators part was not deliberate but due to his ignorance of the rule.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:SinsI]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;no better rule has come along&amp;quot; thing is the first link is stupid. Of course it&#039;s impossible to have a valid rule choosing one over the other when both can be valid. If you read the latter link, I don&#039;t think it in any way supports the &amp;quot;rule&amp;quot; for any dialect of English. [[Anon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let&#039;s just say that without that rule, it is all up to the judgment of the individual - and what sounds OK to one is awkward to another, and translators are actually the worse ones since they always have to switch language contexts, so you can&#039;t trust theirs. Since &amp;quot;that&amp;quot; in restrictive clauses is OK for everyone, whether they adhere to it or not, it is better to enforce that rule - the result is always at least as good as was before, and very often better - never worse. &lt;br /&gt;
[[User:SinsI]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>128.72.16.141</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.baka-tsuki.org/project/index.php?title=User_talk:SinsI&amp;diff=239006</id>
		<title>User talk:SinsI</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.baka-tsuki.org/project/index.php?title=User_talk:SinsI&amp;diff=239006"/>
		<updated>2013-04-03T09:50:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;128.72.16.141: /* &amp;quot;incorrect which&amp;quot; */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==High School DxD==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You don&#039;t really have to edit them part by part, you can edit the whole chapter if you click the edit tab at the top of the page. Also, you really don&#039;t need to change all the &amp;quot;which&#039;s&amp;quot; into &amp;quot;that&#039;s&amp;quot; since they aren&#039;t wrong, so basically it comes down to an individual&#039;s preferences. Use that with restrictive clauses, but keep which with non-restrictive clauses.--[[User:Hiro Hayase|Hiro Hayase]] 14:18, 3 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please look over your changes and fix them, otherwise I might have to rollback everything at once. --[[User:Hiro Hayase|Hiro Hayase]] 14:21, 3 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I edit part by part because there are actually &amp;quot;which&#039;s&amp;quot; that are correct, and it gets tedious searching through the text again (maybe it is my browser, but after I edit the text search is reset back to the top of the text). And it reduces the risk of losing all the edits. Although copying to a notepad and doing it all there at once might be a better choice... 	&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for &amp;quot;restrictive - non-restrictive&amp;quot;, it seems that Code-Zero is not very proficient with that particular rule, so he makes a lot of mistakes with them. Everything I changed is exactly following that rule.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I use  http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/which-versus-that.aspx as a guideline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alright then, I was a bit concerned if you were using find&amp;amp;replace to make those changes without first reading the sentences. Yes, that is a good site.--[[User:Hiro Hayase|Hiro Hayase]] 14:52, 3 June 2012 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi. Just wanted to tell you that in Volume 11 Life 1, the reading remains in past tense even if some of the words are in present tense. It doesn&#039;t read correctly unless some words are in present tense. I&#039;m going to change back those words, but I won&#039;t change anything else. Also there is still a mix between present and past tense in your edit. Do you want me to change it all to past tense? Dan1023 14:56, June 8, 2012&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Dress Boku==&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks very much for the edits! I&#039;ve learnt a lot from my mistakes (no exaggeration)! I hope you&#039;ll continue to help the project, although I might not update it regularly.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Pudding321|Pudding321]] 06:14, 18 February 2013 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;incorrect which&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think several of the uses of &amp;quot;which&amp;quot; you&#039;ve edited out are completely valid, and in some cases actually preferable. For example, in your last edit, the original &amp;quot;clubs which didn&#039;t require magic&amp;quot; should be perfectly fine. If you claim this is incorrect, perhaps you&#039;re referring to the outdated and incorrect grammar rule seen in some places that claimed &amp;quot;which&amp;quot; could not be used in restrictive clauses?&lt;br /&gt;
[[Anon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;quot;While some writers seem to have abandoned the distinction entirely, no better rule has come along to replace the traditional rule. &amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
 http://www.kentlaw.edu/academics/lrw/grinker/LwtaThat_Versus_Which.htm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Furthermore, the &amp;quot;that&amp;quot; rule is more in use in American English, and Baka-Tsuki tend to favor that version, given the requirement to use a specific AE dictionary... &lt;br /&gt;
http://stancarey.wordpress.com/2011/10/18/that-which-is-restrictive/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since there are far too many &amp;quot;which&amp;quot;-&amp;quot;that&amp;quot; errors (in which &amp;quot;which&amp;quot; is &amp;quot;an awkward grammar&amp;quot;), I assume the choice on the translators part was not deliberate but due to his ignorance of the rule.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:SinsI]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;no better rule has come along&amp;quot; thing is the first link is stupid. Of course it&#039;s impossible to have a valid rule choosing one over the other when both can be valid. If you read the latter link, I don&#039;t think it in any way supports the &amp;quot;rule&amp;quot; for any dialect of English. [[Anon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let&#039;s just say that without that rule, it is all up to the judgment of the individual - and what sounds OK to one is awkward to another, and translators are actually the worse ones since they always have to switch language contexts, so you can&#039;t trust theirs. Since &amp;quot;that&amp;quot; in restrictive clauses is OK for everyone, whether they adhere to it or not, it is better to enforce that rule - the result is always at least as good as was before, and very often better - never worse. &lt;br /&gt;
 [[User:SinsI]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>128.72.16.141</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>