Talk:Date A Live:Volume 1 Chapter 5 - Revision history

70.104.17.84 at 03:00, 25 May 2013

2013-05-25T03:00:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:00, 25 May 2013
Line 19:		Line 19:

	As long as it ends up begging the same questions, I don't feel there is a need to change. Any of Shidoh/Shidōu/Shidöu/Shido will still get people asking why it's like that and trying to change it to be consistent. Unfortunately I don't think there is any way to differentiate between them without the same question being asked though. But we definitely should make sure it's consistent across volumes and translators :P --[[User:Jonathanasdf\|jonathanasdf]] ([[User talk:Jonathanasdf\|talk]]) 14:37, 2 November 2012 (CDT)		As long as it ends up begging the same questions, I don't feel there is a need to change. Any of Shidoh/Shidōu/Shidöu/Shido will still get people asking why it's like that and trying to change it to be consistent. Unfortunately I don't think there is any way to differentiate between them without the same question being asked though. But we definitely should make sure it's consistent across volumes and translators :P --[[User:Jonathanasdf\|jonathanasdf]] ([[User talk:Jonathanasdf\|talk]]) 14:37, 2 November 2012 (CDT)

			For any native English speaker, it's just plain weird seeing it lowercase and it bugs the hell out of me. I don't think the issue of capitalization due to differences in Japanese spelling is something to worry about. As such, I'll be capitalizing all occurrences. ---Anon

Jonathanasdf at 19:37, 2 November 2012

2012-11-02T19:37:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:37, 2 November 2012
Line 17:		Line 17:
	If that's the case, using something like Shidoh would help since it's so stronger visually to the reader. Of course you don't have to use Shidoh, just something that sounds similar, Shidōu/Shidöu would be alternatives that are maybe less jarring? --[[User:Drowzycow\|Drowzycow]] ([[User talk:Drowzycow\|talk]]) 05:38, 2 November 2012 (CDT)		If that's the case, using something like Shidoh would help since it's so stronger visually to the reader. Of course you don't have to use Shidoh, just something that sounds similar, Shidōu/Shidöu would be alternatives that are maybe less jarring? --[[User:Drowzycow\|Drowzycow]] ([[User talk:Drowzycow\|talk]]) 05:38, 2 November 2012 (CDT)
	Glancing over at vol2, it looks like Shido is another version being used? --[[User:Drowzycow\|Drowzycow]] ([[User talk:Drowzycow\|talk]]) 06:04, 2 November 2012 (CDT)		Glancing over at vol2, it looks like Shido is another version being used? --[[User:Drowzycow\|Drowzycow]] ([[User talk:Drowzycow\|talk]]) 06:04, 2 November 2012 (CDT)

			As long as it ends up begging the same questions, I don't feel there is a need to change. Any of Shidoh/Shidōu/Shidöu/Shido will still get people asking why it's like that and trying to change it to be consistent. Unfortunately I don't think there is any way to differentiate between them without the same question being asked though. But we definitely should make sure it's consistent across volumes and translators :P --[[User:Jonathanasdf\|jonathanasdf]] ([[User talk:Jonathanasdf\|talk]]) 14:37, 2 November 2012 (CDT)

Drowzycow at 11:04, 2 November 2012

2012-11-02T11:04:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:04, 2 November 2012
Line 16:		Line 16:

	If that's the case, using something like Shidoh would help since it's so stronger visually to the reader. Of course you don't have to use Shidoh, just something that sounds similar, Shidōu/Shidöu would be alternatives that are maybe less jarring? --[[User:Drowzycow\|Drowzycow]] ([[User talk:Drowzycow\|talk]]) 05:38, 2 November 2012 (CDT)		If that's the case, using something like Shidoh would help since it's so stronger visually to the reader. Of course you don't have to use Shidoh, just something that sounds similar, Shidōu/Shidöu would be alternatives that are maybe less jarring? --[[User:Drowzycow\|Drowzycow]] ([[User talk:Drowzycow\|talk]]) 05:38, 2 November 2012 (CDT)
			Glancing over at vol2, it looks like Shido is another version being used? --[[User:Drowzycow\|Drowzycow]] ([[User talk:Drowzycow\|talk]]) 06:04, 2 November 2012 (CDT)

Drowzycow at 10:38, 2 November 2012

2012-11-02T10:38:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:38, 2 November 2012
Line 14:		Line 14:

	I don't know, I personally find Shidoh a lot weirder haha. There are actually cases where this is important in later volumes, because there are some times lots of dialogue sentences in a row without indicating who says what, and the way you tell it's Tohka talking is because she says shidou.. --[[User:Jonathanasdf\|jonathanasdf]] ([[User talk:Jonathanasdf\|talk]]) 01:38, 2 November 2012 (CDT)		I don't know, I personally find Shidoh a lot weirder haha. There are actually cases where this is important in later volumes, because there are some times lots of dialogue sentences in a row without indicating who says what, and the way you tell it's Tohka talking is because she says shidou.. --[[User:Jonathanasdf\|jonathanasdf]] ([[User talk:Jonathanasdf\|talk]]) 01:38, 2 November 2012 (CDT)

			If that's the case, using something like Shidoh would help since it's so stronger visually to the reader. Of course you don't have to use Shidoh, just something that sounds similar, Shidōu/Shidöu would be alternatives that are maybe less jarring? --[[User:Drowzycow\|Drowzycow]] ([[User talk:Drowzycow\|talk]]) 05:38, 2 November 2012 (CDT)

Jonathanasdf at 06:38, 2 November 2012

2012-11-02T06:38:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:38, 2 November 2012
Line 12:		Line 12:

	Maybe Shidoh would be less weird then losing the captalisation? Translator often leaves hidden note next to it to remind editors that it isn't a typo, but then Godoh doesn't really appear that often, just in certain volumes with particular characters talking about the MC.Or reference the first usage, when it appears on for readers--[[User:Drowzycow\|Drowzycow]] ([[User talk:Drowzycow\|talk]]) 21:26, 1 November 2012 (CDT)		Maybe Shidoh would be less weird then losing the captalisation? Translator often leaves hidden note next to it to remind editors that it isn't a typo, but then Godoh doesn't really appear that often, just in certain volumes with particular characters talking about the MC.Or reference the first usage, when it appears on for readers--[[User:Drowzycow\|Drowzycow]] ([[User talk:Drowzycow\|talk]]) 21:26, 1 November 2012 (CDT)

			I don't know, I personally find Shidoh a lot weirder haha. There are actually cases where this is important in later volumes, because there are some times lots of dialogue sentences in a row without indicating who says what, and the way you tell it's Tohka talking is because she says shidou.. --[[User:Jonathanasdf\|jonathanasdf]] ([[User talk:Jonathanasdf\|talk]]) 01:38, 2 November 2012 (CDT)

Drowzycow: MC katakana version in Campione

2012-11-02T02:26:59Z

MC katakana version in Campione

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:26, 2 November 2012
Line 4:		Line 4:

	http://www.baka-tsuki.org/project/index.php?title=Date_A_Live:_Names_and_Terminology_Guidelines Any suggestions for a better place to put this info? Doesn't make sense to put it in notes for every chapter.. --[[User:Jonathanasdf\|jonathanasdf]] ([[User talk:Jonathanasdf\|talk]]) 19:12, 1 November 2012 (CDT)		http://www.baka-tsuki.org/project/index.php?title=Date_A_Live:_Names_and_Terminology_Guidelines Any suggestions for a better place to put this info? Doesn't make sense to put it in notes for every chapter.. --[[User:Jonathanasdf\|jonathanasdf]] ([[User talk:Jonathanasdf\|talk]]) 19:12, 1 November 2012 (CDT)

			Something similar is done with Campione for the MC;

			草薙・護堂 Kusanagi Godou

			ゴドー Godoh (To differentiate when the katakana version is used)

			Maybe Shidoh would be less weird then losing the captalisation? Translator often leaves hidden note next to it to remind editors that it isn't a typo, but then Godoh doesn't really appear that often, just in certain volumes with particular characters talking about the MC.Or reference the first usage, when it appears on for readers--[[User:Drowzycow\|Drowzycow]] ([[User talk:Drowzycow\|talk]]) 21:26, 1 November 2012 (CDT)

Jonathanasdf at 00:12, 2 November 2012

2012-11-02T00:12:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:12, 2 November 2012
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Why is "Shidou" lower cased to "shidou" whenever Tohka says his name?		Why is "Shidou" lower cased to "shidou" whenever Tohka says his name?

			http://www.baka-tsuki.org/project/index.php?title=Date_A_Live:_Names_and_Terminology_Guidelines Any suggestions for a better place to put this info? Doesn't make sense to put it in notes for every chapter.. --[[User:Jonathanasdf\|jonathanasdf]] ([[User talk:Jonathanasdf\|talk]]) 19:12, 1 November 2012 (CDT)

Monsterbandage at 19:05, 1 November 2012

2012-11-01T19:05:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:05, 1 November 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I guess the reference 3 is just a mataphor. It is just supposed to say how extreme it was.--[[User:KaprJarda\|KaprJarda]] ([[User talk:KaprJarda\|talk]]) 17:19, 30 October 2012 (CDT)		I guess the reference 3 is just a mataphor. It is just supposed to say how extreme it was.--[[User:KaprJarda\|KaprJarda]] ([[User talk:KaprJarda\|talk]]) 17:19, 30 October 2012 (CDT)

			Why is "Shidou" lower cased to "shidou" whenever Tohka says his name?

Zuruumi: Created page with "I guess the reference 3 is just a mataphor. It is just supposed to say how extreme it was.--~~~~"

2012-10-30T22:19:37Z

Created page with "I guess the reference 3 is just a mataphor. It is just supposed to say how extreme it was.--~~~~"

New page

I guess the reference 3 is just a mataphor. It is just supposed to say how extreme it was.--[[User:KaprJarda|KaprJarda]] ([[User talk:KaprJarda|talk]]) 17:19, 30 October 2012 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:37, 2 November 2012
Line 17:		Line 17:
	If that's the case, using something like Shidoh would help since it's so stronger visually to the reader. Of course you don't have to use Shidoh, just something that sounds similar, Shidōu/Shidöu would be alternatives that are maybe less jarring? --[[User:Drowzycow\|Drowzycow]] ([[User talk:Drowzycow\|talk]]) 05:38, 2 November 2012 (CDT)		If that's the case, using something like Shidoh would help since it's so stronger visually to the reader. Of course you don't have to use Shidoh, just something that sounds similar, Shidōu/Shidöu would be alternatives that are maybe less jarring? --[[User:Drowzycow\|Drowzycow]] ([[User talk:Drowzycow\|talk]]) 05:38, 2 November 2012 (CDT)
	Glancing over at vol2, it looks like Shido is another version being used? --[[User:Drowzycow\|Drowzycow]] ([[User talk:Drowzycow\|talk]]) 06:04, 2 November 2012 (CDT)		Glancing over at vol2, it looks like Shido is another version being used? --[[User:Drowzycow\|Drowzycow]] ([[User talk:Drowzycow\|talk]]) 06:04, 2 November 2012 (CDT)

			As long as it ends up begging the same questions, I don't feel there is a need to change. Any of Shidoh/Shidōu/Shidöu/Shido will still get people asking why it's like that and trying to change it to be consistent. Unfortunately I don't think there is any way to differentiate between them without the same question being asked though. But we definitely should make sure it's consistent across volumes and translators :P --[[User:Jonathanasdf\|jonathanasdf]] ([[User talk:Jonathanasdf\|talk]]) 14:37, 2 November 2012 (CDT)