Talk:Hagure Yuusha no Aesthetica:Volume 4 Prologue - Revision history

Joegargery: blanked

2014-03-01T17:49:22Z

blanked

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:49, 1 March 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	My online source(Chinese) is missing part 3, also found another source that doesn't have a part 3 either. Hopefully it is just a typo(4 instead of a 3). So if anyone has an Japanese raw can feel free to finish it or let me know it is a typo. It still needs TLC, but enjoy. "[[User:Joegargery\|Joegargery]] ([[User talk:Joegargery\|talk]]) 6:09, 30 January 2014 (CST)"

	:No, I've checked the japanese text and it has 4 parts. I'll upload a tranlation plus a basic checking of the rest of the text in some hours. for now, I'll just make an adjust to the title (in japanese, the "mono" after a verb is more often than not the related substantive, like in this case, "Heiwa no owari wo tsugerumono").--[[User:Kemm\|Kemm]] ([[User talk:Kemm\|talk]]) 07:46, 31 January 2014 (CST)

	::Thank you. Needless to say i became a little dis-hearten when I found out part 3 was missing and the translation would have to be left unfinished. The title and most of part 1, was already done by another user so I left it alone for the most part. Line 4 mentions a "landfill" and line 22 starting with "though on the other hand" were parts that i left as is, but was not too sure about. Again thank you, any help is always appreciated."[[User:Joegargery\|Joegargery]] ([[User talk:Joegargery\|talk]]) 10:46, 31 January 2014 (CST)"

	:::Found the problem. Chinese raws DO have part 3. They simply didn't mark it as such. I've moved part 3 to its proper section and will continue checking the translation tomorrow.--[[User:Kemm\|Kemm]] ([[User talk:Kemm\|talk]]) 13:54, 31 January 2014 (CST)

	::Looks like u did a complete re-translation. They were similar between (chinese/japenese to english translation can be)and overall it was helpfull. Ty for your time. "[[User:Joegargery\|Joegargery]] ([[User talk:Joegargery\|talk]]) 15:43, 3 February 2014 (CST)"

69.115.6.239 at 20:46, 3 February 2014

2014-02-03T20:46:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:46, 3 February 2014
Line 6:		Line 6:

	:::Found the problem. Chinese raws DO have part 3. They simply didn't mark it as such. I've moved part 3 to its proper section and will continue checking the translation tomorrow.--[[User:Kemm\|Kemm]] ([[User talk:Kemm\|talk]]) 13:54, 31 January 2014 (CST)		:::Found the problem. Chinese raws DO have part 3. They simply didn't mark it as such. I've moved part 3 to its proper section and will continue checking the translation tomorrow.--[[User:Kemm\|Kemm]] ([[User talk:Kemm\|talk]]) 13:54, 31 January 2014 (CST)

			::Looks like u did a complete re-translation. They were similar between (chinese/japenese to english translation can be)and overall it was helpfull. Ty for your time. "[[User:Joegargery\|Joegargery]] ([[User talk:Joegargery\|talk]]) 15:43, 3 February 2014 (CST)"

Kemm at 19:54, 31 January 2014

2014-01-31T19:54:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:54, 31 January 2014
Line 4:		Line 4:

	::Thank you. Needless to say i became a little dis-hearten when I found out part 3 was missing and the translation would have to be left unfinished. The title and most of part 1, was already done by another user so I left it alone for the most part. Line 4 mentions a "landfill" and line 22 starting with "though on the other hand" were parts that i left as is, but was not too sure about. Again thank you, any help is always appreciated."[[User:Joegargery\|Joegargery]] ([[User talk:Joegargery\|talk]]) 10:46, 31 January 2014 (CST)"		::Thank you. Needless to say i became a little dis-hearten when I found out part 3 was missing and the translation would have to be left unfinished. The title and most of part 1, was already done by another user so I left it alone for the most part. Line 4 mentions a "landfill" and line 22 starting with "though on the other hand" were parts that i left as is, but was not too sure about. Again thank you, any help is always appreciated."[[User:Joegargery\|Joegargery]] ([[User talk:Joegargery\|talk]]) 10:46, 31 January 2014 (CST)"

			:::Found the problem. Chinese raws DO have part 3. They simply didn't mark it as such. I've moved part 3 to its proper section and will continue checking the translation tomorrow.--[[User:Kemm\|Kemm]] ([[User talk:Kemm\|talk]]) 13:54, 31 January 2014 (CST)

Joegargery at 15:53, 31 January 2014

2014-01-31T15:53:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:53, 31 January 2014
Line 2:		Line 2:

	:No, I've checked the japanese text and it has 4 parts. I'll upload a tranlation plus a basic checking of the rest of the text in some hours. for now, I'll just make an adjust to the title (in japanese, the "mono" after a verb is more often than not the related substantive, like in this case, "Heiwa no owari wo tsugerumono").--[[User:Kemm\|Kemm]] ([[User talk:Kemm\|talk]]) 07:46, 31 January 2014 (CST)		:No, I've checked the japanese text and it has 4 parts. I'll upload a tranlation plus a basic checking of the rest of the text in some hours. for now, I'll just make an adjust to the title (in japanese, the "mono" after a verb is more often than not the related substantive, like in this case, "Heiwa no owari wo tsugerumono").--[[User:Kemm\|Kemm]] ([[User talk:Kemm\|talk]]) 07:46, 31 January 2014 (CST)

			::Thank you. Needless to say i became a little dis-hearten when I found out part 3 was missing and the translation would have to be left unfinished. The title and most of part 1, was already done by another user so I left it alone for the most part. Line 4 mentions a "landfill" and line 22 starting with "though on the other hand" were parts that i left as is, but was not too sure about. Again thank you, any help is always appreciated."[[User:Joegargery\|Joegargery]] ([[User talk:Joegargery\|talk]]) 10:46, 31 January 2014 (CST)"

Kemm at 13:46, 31 January 2014

2014-01-31T13:46:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:46, 31 January 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	My online source(Chinese) is missing part 3, also found another source that doesn't have a part 3 either. Hopefully it is just a typo(4 instead of a 3). So if anyone has an Japanese raw can feel free to finish it or let me know it is a typo. It still needs TLC, but enjoy. "[[User:Joegargery\|Joegargery]] ([[User talk:Joegargery\|talk]]) 6:09, 30 January 2014 (CST)"		My online source(Chinese) is missing part 3, also found another source that doesn't have a part 3 either. Hopefully it is just a typo(4 instead of a 3). So if anyone has an Japanese raw can feel free to finish it or let me know it is a typo. It still needs TLC, but enjoy. "[[User:Joegargery\|Joegargery]] ([[User talk:Joegargery\|talk]]) 6:09, 30 January 2014 (CST)"

			:No, I've checked the japanese text and it has 4 parts. I'll upload a tranlation plus a basic checking of the rest of the text in some hours. for now, I'll just make an adjust to the title (in japanese, the "mono" after a verb is more often than not the related substantive, like in this case, "Heiwa no owari wo tsugerumono").--[[User:Kemm\|Kemm]] ([[User talk:Kemm\|talk]]) 07:46, 31 January 2014 (CST)

69.115.6.239 at 20:05, 30 January 2014

2014-01-30T20:05:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:05, 30 January 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	My online source is missing part 3, so anyone can feel free to finish it~~(I plan on moving on)~~. It still needs ~~Tlc~~, but enjoy. "[[User:Joegargery\|Joegargery]] ([[User talk:Joegargery\|talk]]) 6:09, 27 January 2014 (CST)"		My online source(Chinese) is missing part 3, also found another source that doesn't have a part 3 either. Hopefully it is just a typo(4 instead of a 3). So if anyone has an Japanese raw can feel free to finish it or let me know it is a typo. It still needs TLC, but enjoy. "[[User:Joegargery\|Joegargery]] ([[User talk:Joegargery\|talk]]) 6:09, 30 January 2014 (CST)"

69.115.6.239 at 05:28, 29 January 2014

2014-01-29T05:28:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:28, 29 January 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~Waiting for jn19930 to finish, so the terminology can be the same in part 4.~~ My online source is missing part 3, so anyone can feel free to finish it(I plan on moving on~~, to what idk let~~). It still needs Tlc, but enjoy. "[[User:Joegargery\|Joegargery]] ([[User talk:Joegargery\|talk]]) 6:09, 27 January 2014 (CST)"		My online source is missing part 3, so anyone can feel free to finish it(I plan on moving on). It still needs Tlc, but enjoy. "[[User:Joegargery\|Joegargery]] ([[User talk:Joegargery\|talk]]) 6:09, 27 January 2014 (CST)"

Joegargery at 23:04, 27 January 2014

2014-01-27T23:04:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:04, 27 January 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Waiting for jn19930 to finish, so the terminology can be the same in part 4. My online source is missing part 3, so anyone can feel free to finish it(I plan on moving on, to what idk let). It still needs Tlc, but enjoy.		Waiting for jn19930 to finish, so the terminology can be the same in part 4. My online source is missing part 3, so anyone can feel free to finish it(I plan on moving on, to what idk let). It still needs Tlc, but enjoy. "[[User:Joegargery\|Joegargery]] ([[User talk:Joegargery\|talk]]) 6:09, 27 January 2014 (CST)"

Joegargery: Created page with "Waiting for jn19930 to finish, so the terminology can be the same in part 4. My online source is missing part 3, so anyone can feel free to finish it(I plan on moving on, to ..."

2014-01-27T23:02:56Z

Created page with "Waiting for jn19930 to finish, so the terminology can be the same in part 4. My online source is missing part 3, so anyone can feel free to finish it(I plan on moving on, to ..."

New page

Waiting for jn19930 to finish, so the terminology can be the same in part 4. My online source is missing part 3, so anyone can feel free to finish it(I plan on moving on, to what idk let). It still needs Tlc, but enjoy.

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:49, 1 March 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	My online source(Chinese) is missing part 3, also found another source that doesn't have a part 3 either. Hopefully it is just a typo(4 instead of a 3). So if anyone has an Japanese raw can feel free to finish it or let me know it is a typo. It still needs TLC, but enjoy. "[[User:Joegargery\|Joegargery]] ([[User talk:Joegargery\|talk]]) 6:09, 30 January 2014 (CST)"

	:No, I've checked the japanese text and it has 4 parts. I'll upload a tranlation plus a basic checking of the rest of the text in some hours. for now, I'll just make an adjust to the title (in japanese, the "mono" after a verb is more often than not the related substantive, like in this case, "Heiwa no owari wo tsugerumono").--[[User:Kemm\|Kemm]] ([[User talk:Kemm\|talk]]) 07:46, 31 January 2014 (CST)

	::Thank you. Needless to say i became a little dis-hearten when I found out part 3 was missing and the translation would have to be left unfinished. The title and most of part 1, was already done by another user so I left it alone for the most part. Line 4 mentions a "landfill" and line 22 starting with "though on the other hand" were parts that i left as is, but was not too sure about. Again thank you, any help is always appreciated."[[User:Joegargery\|Joegargery]] ([[User talk:Joegargery\|talk]]) 10:46, 31 January 2014 (CST)"

	:::Found the problem. Chinese raws DO have part 3. They simply didn't mark it as such. I've moved part 3 to its proper section and will continue checking the translation tomorrow.--[[User:Kemm\|Kemm]] ([[User talk:Kemm\|talk]]) 13:54, 31 January 2014 (CST)

	::Looks like u did a complete re-translation. They were similar between (chinese/japenese to english translation can be)and overall it was helpfull. Ty for your time. "[[User:Joegargery\|Joegargery]] ([[User talk:Joegargery\|talk]]) 15:43, 3 February 2014 (CST)"