Talk:Hidan no Aria:Volume7 Chapter4 - Revision history

Zero2001 at 00:05, 15 September 2011

2011-09-15T00:05:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:05, 15 September 2011
Line 48:		Line 48:
	...Gone to 92% now. [[User:Kira0802\|Kira]] ([[User_talk:Kira0802\|Talk]]) 17:57, 11 September 2011 (CDT)		...Gone to 92% now. [[User:Kira0802\|Kira]] ([[User_talk:Kira0802\|Talk]]) 17:57, 11 September 2011 (CDT)

	FINALLY!!! THANK YOU, THANK YOU< THANK YOU VERY MUCH. [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 19:05, 14 September 2011 (CDT)		FINALLY!!! THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU VERY MUCH. [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 19:05, 14 September 2011 (CDT)

Zero2001 at 00:05, 15 September 2011

2011-09-15T00:05:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:05, 15 September 2011
Line 44:		Line 44:
	That is correct --[[User:Cosmic Eagle\|Cosmic Eagle]] 00:05, 23 July 2011 (UCT)		That is correct --[[User:Cosmic Eagle\|Cosmic Eagle]] 00:05, 23 July 2011 (UCT)

	What's wrong? Translation stopped, there is only 9% left. Did something happen? [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 12:11, 30 August 2011 (CDT)		What's wrong? Translation stopped, there is only 9% left. Did something happen? [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 12:11, 30 August 2011 (CDT)

	...Gone to 92% now. [[User:Kira0802\|Kira]] ([[User_talk:Kira0802\|Talk]]) 17:57, 11 September 2011 (CDT)		...Gone to 92% now. [[User:Kira0802\|Kira]] ([[User_talk:Kira0802\|Talk]]) 17:57, 11 September 2011 (CDT)

			FINALLY!!! THANK YOU, THANK YOU< THANK YOU VERY MUCH. [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 19:05, 14 September 2011 (CDT)

Kira0802 at 22:57, 11 September 2011

2011-09-11T22:57:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:57, 11 September 2011
Line 45:		Line 45:

	What's wrong? Translation stopped, there is only 9% left. Did something happen? [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 12:11, 30 August 2011 (CDT)		What's wrong? Translation stopped, there is only 9% left. Did something happen? [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 12:11, 30 August 2011 (CDT)

			...Gone to 92% now. [[User:Kira0802\|Kira]] ([[User_talk:Kira0802\|Talk]]) 17:57, 11 September 2011 (CDT)

Zero2001: What's wrong? Translation stopped.

2011-08-30T17:11:19Z

What's wrong? Translation stopped.

Cosmic Eagle at 00:05, 23 July 2011

2011-07-23T00:05:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:05, 23 July 2011
Line 41:		Line 41:
	Nod...tremble, tremble		Nod...tremble, tremble
	I believe that the word "tremble" has been used in the part written above to denote the shaking of the head in order to convey the word "no". If so then this is an incorrect choice of words. "Tremble" means to ''shake involuntarily, typically as a result of anxiety, excitement, or frailty''. The word "shake" would be more appropriate as it is used to denote the shaking of the head and is considered the opposite of "nod". If my initial assumption is incorrect, then kindly inform me. [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 05:50, 20 July 2011 (UCT)		I believe that the word "tremble" has been used in the part written above to denote the shaking of the head in order to convey the word "no". If so then this is an incorrect choice of words. "Tremble" means to ''shake involuntarily, typically as a result of anxiety, excitement, or frailty''. The word "shake" would be more appropriate as it is used to denote the shaking of the head and is considered the opposite of "nod". If my initial assumption is incorrect, then kindly inform me. [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 05:50, 20 July 2011 (UCT)

			That is correct --[[User:Cosmic Eagle\|Cosmic Eagle]] 00:05, 23 July 2011 (UCT)

Zero2001 at 05:50, 20 July 2011

2011-07-20T05:50:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:50, 20 July 2011
Line 34:		Line 34:

	Ah....right. Thanks for that, stupid careless mistake on my part. Going to edit now.....Fuck that was a seriously retarded mistake.....so damned basic.--[[User:Cosmic Eagle\|Cosmic Eagle]] 16:54, 16 July 2011 (UCT)		Ah....right. Thanks for that, stupid careless mistake on my part. Going to edit now.....Fuck that was a seriously retarded mistake.....so damned basic.--[[User:Cosmic Eagle\|Cosmic Eagle]] 16:54, 16 July 2011 (UCT)

			"You, yourself forgot didn't you?"
			Tremble, tremble, tremble
			Presently, her twin tails were violently swinging from side to side and her eyes tightly shut as she shook her head.
			"You'd thought I'd ignored it then?"
			Nod...tremble, tremble
			I believe that the word "tremble" has been used in the part written above to denote the shaking of the head in order to convey the word "no". If so then this is an incorrect choice of words. "Tremble" means to ''shake involuntarily, typically as a result of anxiety, excitement, or frailty''. The word "shake" would be more appropriate as it is used to denote the shaking of the head and is considered the opposite of "nod". If my initial assumption is incorrect, then kindly inform me. [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 05:50, 20 July 2011 (UCT)

Cosmic Eagle at 16:58, 16 July 2011

2011-07-16T16:58:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:58, 16 July 2011
Line 33:		Line 33:
	I was just reading through, and I thought it was a bit weird too, so I looked it up. [年にもよるが乙女座は9月23日まで。　つまり、今日までだ。]. The use of 'まで' here means end. I also looked it up on the net (oh the irony) and according to wikipedia, Virgo begins August 23 and ends on September 23. --psylo		I was just reading through, and I thought it was a bit weird too, so I looked it up. [年にもよるが乙女座は9月23日まで。　つまり、今日までだ。]. The use of 'まで' here means end. I also looked it up on the net (oh the irony) and according to wikipedia, Virgo begins August 23 and ends on September 23. --psylo

	Ah....right. Thanks for that, stupid careless mistake on my part. Going to edit now--[[User:Cosmic Eagle\|Cosmic Eagle]] 16:54, 16 July 2011 (UCT)		Ah....right. Thanks for that, stupid careless mistake on my part. Going to edit now.....Fuck that was a seriously retarded mistake.....so damned basic.--[[User:Cosmic Eagle\|Cosmic Eagle]] 16:54, 16 July 2011 (UCT)

Cosmic Eagle at 16:54, 16 July 2011

2011-07-16T16:54:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:54, 16 July 2011
Line 32:		Line 32:

	I was just reading through, and I thought it was a bit weird too, so I looked it up. [年にもよるが乙女座は9月23日まで。　つまり、今日までだ。]. The use of 'まで' here means end. I also looked it up on the net (oh the irony) and according to wikipedia, Virgo begins August 23 and ends on September 23. --psylo		I was just reading through, and I thought it was a bit weird too, so I looked it up. [年にもよるが乙女座は9月23日まで。　つまり、今日までだ。]. The use of 'まで' here means end. I also looked it up on the net (oh the irony) and according to wikipedia, Virgo begins August 23 and ends on September 23. --psylo

			Ah....right. Thanks for that, stupid careless mistake on my part. Going to edit now--[[User:Cosmic Eagle\|Cosmic Eagle]] 16:54, 16 July 2011 (UCT)

24.85.54.141 at 22:36, 14 July 2011

2011-07-14T22:36:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:36, 14 July 2011
Line 30:		Line 30:

	That has been cleared up in the following sentences. Please read on and see. In hindsight I should not have stopped there but I needed to sleep.--[[User:Cosmic Eagle\|Cosmic Eagle]] 05:45, 11 July 2011 (UCT)		That has been cleared up in the following sentences. Please read on and see. In hindsight I should not have stopped there but I needed to sleep.--[[User:Cosmic Eagle\|Cosmic Eagle]] 05:45, 11 July 2011 (UCT)

			I was just reading through, and I thought it was a bit weird too, so I looked it up. [年にもよるが乙女座は9月23日まで。　つまり、今日までだ。]. The use of 'まで' here means end. I also looked it up on the net (oh the irony) and according to wikipedia, Virgo begins August 23 and ends on September 23. --psylo

Cosmic Eagle at 05:45, 11 July 2011

2011-07-11T05:45:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:45, 11 July 2011
Line 29:		Line 29:
	Am I understanding this wrong here, or is this a mistranslation or perhaps a logical reasoning failure on the part of the author?		Am I understanding this wrong here, or is this a mistranslation or perhaps a logical reasoning failure on the part of the author?

	That has been cleared up in the following sentences. Please read on and see.		That has been cleared up in the following sentences. Please read on and see. In hindsight I should not have stopped there but I needed to sleep.--[[User:Cosmic Eagle\|Cosmic Eagle]] 05:45, 11 July 2011 (UCT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:05, 15 September 2011
Line 44:		Line 44:
	That is correct --[[User:Cosmic Eagle\|Cosmic Eagle]] 00:05, 23 July 2011 (UCT)		That is correct --[[User:Cosmic Eagle\|Cosmic Eagle]] 00:05, 23 July 2011 (UCT)

	What's wrong? Translation stopped, there is only 9% left. Did something happen? [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 12:11, 30 August 2011 (CDT)		What's wrong? Translation stopped, there is only 9% left. Did something happen? [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 12:11, 30 August 2011 (CDT)

	...Gone to 92% now. [[User:Kira0802\|Kira]] ([[User_talk:Kira0802\|Talk]]) 17:57, 11 September 2011 (CDT)		...Gone to 92% now. [[User:Kira0802\|Kira]] ([[User_talk:Kira0802\|Talk]]) 17:57, 11 September 2011 (CDT)

			FINALLY!!! THANK YOU, THANK YOU< THANK YOU VERY MUCH. [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 19:05, 14 September 2011 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:05, 23 July 2011
Line 41:		Line 41:
	Nod...tremble, tremble		Nod...tremble, tremble
	I believe that the word "tremble" has been used in the part written above to denote the shaking of the head in order to convey the word "no". If so then this is an incorrect choice of words. "Tremble" means to ''shake involuntarily, typically as a result of anxiety, excitement, or frailty''. The word "shake" would be more appropriate as it is used to denote the shaking of the head and is considered the opposite of "nod". If my initial assumption is incorrect, then kindly inform me. [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 05:50, 20 July 2011 (UCT)		I believe that the word "tremble" has been used in the part written above to denote the shaking of the head in order to convey the word "no". If so then this is an incorrect choice of words. "Tremble" means to ''shake involuntarily, typically as a result of anxiety, excitement, or frailty''. The word "shake" would be more appropriate as it is used to denote the shaking of the head and is considered the opposite of "nod". If my initial assumption is incorrect, then kindly inform me. [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 05:50, 20 July 2011 (UCT)

			That is correct --[[User:Cosmic Eagle\|Cosmic Eagle]] 00:05, 23 July 2011 (UCT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:11, 30 August 2011
Line 7:		Line 7:


	Love... making??? As in sex? Are you sure that's correct? [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 04:18, 8 July 2011 (UCT)		Love... making??? As in sex? Are you sure that's correct? [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 04:18, 8 July 2011 (UCT)

	* Look, if you want attention that badly start your own site or blog and link people to it. There's being a useful editor and then there's imposing yourself over a series and being an annoyance that puts people off and screws over everyone else who are trying to stay passive. I'm tired of drama and running out of things to read. Something is only free until you begin using that freedom to restrict others, at which point you have the freedom to take responsibility and stop. Would everyone just back off from the series and let it be worked on already. --[[Main_Page\|Someone Random]] 10:something, 8 July 2011 (PST)		* Look, if you want attention that badly start your own site or blog and link people to it. There's being a useful editor and then there's imposing yourself over a series and being an annoyance that puts people off and screws over everyone else who are trying to stay passive. I'm tired of drama and running out of things to read. Something is only free until you begin using that freedom to restrict others, at which point you have the freedom to take responsibility and stop. Would everyone just back off from the series and let it be worked on already. --[[Main_Page\|Someone Random]] 10:something, 8 July 2011 (PST)
Line 19:		Line 19:
	Hmm. Ren'ai does translate to passion but it also translates to lovemaking, just as you said. However it also furthermore translates to love, affections or emotions. However the closest match that is found on the net is "Romance" or "Romantic Love". Sorry for the lateness but I wished to make sure by searching out and comparing different sources: [http://translate.google.com/#auto\|en\|%E6%81%8B%E6%84%9B]		Hmm. Ren'ai does translate to passion but it also translates to lovemaking, just as you said. However it also furthermore translates to love, affections or emotions. However the closest match that is found on the net is "Romance" or "Romantic Love". Sorry for the lateness but I wished to make sure by searching out and comparing different sources: [http://translate.google.com/#auto\|en\|%E6%81%8B%E6%84%9B]
	[http://japanese.about.com/od/japanesecultur1/a/The-Japanese-Words-For-Love.htm]		[http://japanese.about.com/od/japanesecultur1/a/The-Japanese-Words-For-Love.htm]
	(I wanted to give a drama wiki link too but it got blocked ~~bythe~~ spam filter)		(I wanted to give a drama wiki link too but it got blocked by the spam filter)
	The current one is okay too. Actually I find it funny. But can you consider these. It's fine if you reject them but please at least go through them first. I only wish to help after all. [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 01:34, 10 July 2011 (UCT)		The current one is okay too. Actually I find it funny. But can you consider these. It's fine if you reject them but please at least go through them first. I only wish to help after all. [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 01:34, 10 July 2011 (UCT)

	Doesn't carry the same intensity. It's Riko talking and the way the word is used in most situations...romance seems a bit too mild --[[User:Cosmic Eagle\|Cosmic Eagle]] 03:22, 10 July 2011 (UCT)		Doesn't carry the same intensity. It's Riko talking and the way the word is used in most situations...romance seems a bit too mild --[[User:Cosmic Eagle\|Cosmic Eagle]] 03:22, 10 July 2011 (UCT)

	To Cosmic: Okay I can understand if you put Riko'as personality in the equation. Just wished to understand. Thanks for explaining to me. [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 03:41, 10 July 2011 (UCT)		To Cosmic: Okay I can understand if you put Riko's personality in the equation. Just wished to understand. Thanks for explaining to me. [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 03:41, 10 July 2011 (UCT)

	Regarding the last paragraph currently translated - "<small>I found that Virgo began on the 23rd of September. In other words, today. If Aria's birthday was before this date, I should be blown full of holes by now. As such, I can guess that today is her birthday.</small>" -- that seems odd to me, considering the logic of it. If she was a virgo and it started Sept 23rd, it'd only mean that would be the ''first'' possible day that it could be her birthday (and the exclusion logic is unwarranted). However, if it were Sept 23rd being the ''last'' day for virgo, then you could reasonably conclude that it must be her birthday simply because it hasn't happened yet already.		Regarding the last paragraph currently translated - "<small>I found that Virgo began on the 23rd of September. In other words, today. If Aria's birthday was before this date, I should be blown full of holes by now. As such, I can guess that today is her birthday.</small>" -- that seems odd to me, considering the logic of it. If she was a virgo and it started Sept 23rd, it'd only mean that would be the ''first'' possible day that it could be her birthday (and the exclusion logic is unwarranted). However, if it were Sept 23rd being the ''last'' day for virgo, then you could reasonably conclude that it must be her birthday simply because it hasn't happened yet already.
	Am I understanding this wrong here, or is this a mistranslation or perhaps a logical reasoning failure on the part of the author?		Am I understanding this wrong here, or is this a mistranslation or perhaps a logical reasoning failure on the part of the author?

Line 40:		Line 40:
	"You'd thought I'd ignored it then?"		"You'd thought I'd ignored it then?"
	Nod...tremble, tremble		Nod...tremble, tremble
	I believe that the word "tremble" has been used in the part written above to denote the shaking of the head in order to convey the word "no". If so then this is an incorrect choice of words. "Tremble" means to ''shake involuntarily, typically as a result of anxiety, excitement, or frailty''. The word "shake" would be more appropriate as it is used to denote the shaking of the head and is considered the opposite of "nod". If my initial assumption is incorrect, then kindly inform me. [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 05:50, 20 July 2011 (UCT)		I believe that the word "tremble" has been used in the part written above to denote the shaking of the head in order to convey the word "no". If so then this is an incorrect choice of words. "Tremble" means to ''shake involuntarily, typically as a result of anxiety, excitement, or frailty''. The word "shake" would be more appropriate as it is used to denote the shaking of the head and is considered the opposite of "nod". If my initial assumption is incorrect, then kindly inform me. [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 05:50, 20 July 2011 (UCT)

	That is correct --[[User:Cosmic Eagle\|Cosmic Eagle]] 00:05, 23 July 2011 (UCT)		That is correct --[[User:Cosmic Eagle\|Cosmic Eagle]] 00:05, 23 July 2011 (UCT)

			What's wrong? Translation stopped, there is only 9% left. Did something happen? [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 12:11, 30 August 2011 (CDT)