Talk:IS:Volume6 Chapter1 - Revision history

80.58.205.105: /* --LINE 1-- */

2011-10-04T21:15:19Z

--LINE 1--

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:15, 4 October 2011
Line 16:		Line 16:

	I would also say "Erased" is ok, but I think a TL'note regarding the information that it is a Base that not exists on a map would be nice. --[[User:Darklor\|Darklor]] 10:14, 16 February 2011 (UTC)		I would also say "Erased" is ok, but I think a TL'note regarding the information that it is a Base that not exists on a map would be nice. --[[User:Darklor\|Darklor]] 10:14, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

			The translation note about the name of this base is wrong. It's not a Harry Potter reference since, among other things, that mirror you say is called "Mirror of Erised" ("desire" written backwards), not "erased". BTW, the words that mirror has engraved were also backwards ("erised stra ehru oyt ube cafru oyt on wohsi", flip it).

	==Minor errors==		==Minor errors==

Wildcards: /* Laura's military rank */ new section

2011-09-27T19:39:39Z

Laura's military rank: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:39, 27 September 2011
Line 114:		Line 114:

	OK, so I'll edit with the past. [[User:Kira0802\|Kira0802]] 16:19, 2 March 2011 (UTC)		OK, so I'll edit with the past. [[User:Kira0802\|Kira0802]] 16:19, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

			== Laura's military rank ==

			Thanks for the awesome translation. I think we finally established Laura's military rank here. However, Lt.Commander is actually a navy rank, which I doubt Laura would actually use. The more common Army/Air Force equivalent would be major. Also, since she's a German officer, I wonder if ''Frau Major'' would be better then Major-dono... Just my thought.--[[User:Wildcards\|Wildcards]] 14:39, 27 September 2011 (CDT)

Kira0802: /* Tense */

2011-03-02T16:19:15Z

Tense

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:19, 2 March 2011
Line 112:		Line 112:

	Checking the original work again, it seems even in Japanese they use past tense in the narration. So unless English has different rule for first-person narration, I guess using past tense will be better ^_^ --[[User:Kuroi shinigami\|Kuroi shinigami]] 11:51, 2 March 2011 (UTC)		Checking the original work again, it seems even in Japanese they use past tense in the narration. So unless English has different rule for first-person narration, I guess using past tense will be better ^_^ --[[User:Kuroi shinigami\|Kuroi shinigami]] 11:51, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

			OK, so I'll edit with the past. [[User:Kira0802\|Kira0802]] 16:19, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Kuroi shinigami: /* Tense */

2011-03-02T11:51:14Z

Tense

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:51, 2 March 2011
Line 109:		Line 109:

	Uhhh, which one do you think is better for a first person narration? XD I keep the tenses in the conversation part just like the original work(past tense when they use "datta" in the original work, present tense otherwise) but I'm not sure whether first person narration have the same rules in Japanese and English or not so, I'll leave it to the editors. Most of the narration beside the 1st part is done in 1st person view. Sorry to put more work in the editors XD --[[User:Kuroi shinigami\|Kuroi shinigami]] 09:01, 2 March 2011 (UTC)		Uhhh, which one do you think is better for a first person narration? XD I keep the tenses in the conversation part just like the original work(past tense when they use "datta" in the original work, present tense otherwise) but I'm not sure whether first person narration have the same rules in Japanese and English or not so, I'll leave it to the editors. Most of the narration beside the 1st part is done in 1st person view. Sorry to put more work in the editors XD --[[User:Kuroi shinigami\|Kuroi shinigami]] 09:01, 2 March 2011 (UTC)


			Checking the original work again, it seems even in Japanese they use past tense in the narration. So unless English has different rule for first-person narration, I guess using past tense will be better ^_^ --[[User:Kuroi shinigami\|Kuroi shinigami]] 11:51, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Kuroi shinigami: /* Tense */

2011-03-02T09:01:09Z

Tense

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:01, 2 March 2011
Line 107:		Line 107:

	Do you use present or past tense^ It<ll make my editing faster. Thx [[User:Kira0802\|Kira0802]] 16:11, 1 March 2011 (UTC)		Do you use present or past tense^ It<ll make my editing faster. Thx [[User:Kira0802\|Kira0802]] 16:11, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

			Uhhh, which one do you think is better for a first person narration? XD I keep the tenses in the conversation part just like the original work(past tense when they use "datta" in the original work, present tense otherwise) but I'm not sure whether first person narration have the same rules in Japanese and English or not so, I'll leave it to the editors. Most of the narration beside the 1st part is done in 1st person view. Sorry to put more work in the editors XD --[[User:Kuroi shinigami\|Kuroi shinigami]] 09:01, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Kira0802 at 16:11, 1 March 2011

2011-03-01T16:11:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:11, 1 March 2011
Line 103:		Line 103:

	Sorry bout that XD. My English is not that good to find a better word for that XD.--[[User:Kuroi shinigami\|Kuroi shinigami]] 10:47, 21 February 2011 (UTC)		Sorry bout that XD. My English is not that good to find a better word for that XD.--[[User:Kuroi shinigami\|Kuroi shinigami]] 10:47, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

			==Tense==

			Do you use present or past tense^ It<ll make my editing faster. Thx [[User:Kira0802\|Kira0802]] 16:11, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Larethian at 15:59, 1 March 2011

2011-03-01T15:59:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:59, 1 March 2011
Line 103:		Line 103:

	Sorry bout that XD. My English is not that good to find a better word for that XD.--[[User:Kuroi shinigami\|Kuroi shinigami]] 10:47, 21 February 2011 (UTC)		Sorry bout that XD. My English is not that good to find a better word for that XD.--[[User:Kuroi shinigami\|Kuroi shinigami]] 10:47, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

	~~== Cough, 5 more lines ==~~

	~~ermm, you left off with 5 more lines on intent, or did you miss them? (^_^)"~~

Larethian: /* Cough, 5 more lines */ new section

2011-03-01T15:43:58Z

Cough, 5 more lines: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:43, 1 March 2011
Line 103:		Line 103:

	Sorry bout that XD. My English is not that good to find a better word for that XD.--[[User:Kuroi shinigami\|Kuroi shinigami]] 10:47, 21 February 2011 (UTC)		Sorry bout that XD. My English is not that good to find a better word for that XD.--[[User:Kuroi shinigami\|Kuroi shinigami]] 10:47, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

			== Cough, 5 more lines ==

			ermm, you left off with 5 more lines on intent, or did you miss them? (^_^)"

Kuroi shinigami: /* --Standard Format-- */

2011-02-21T10:47:36Z

--Standard Format--

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:47, 21 February 2011
Line 97:		Line 97:
	==--Standard Format--==		==--Standard Format--==

	I have a problem about the IS form naming format. When Personal IS is unused, they are stored in an accessory form. Zephyr from Animesuki Forum gave a good name to that form called closed form(and open form for the battle mode), while the literal translation is specialized mechanism form(得機形態) which one do you think is better to be used? I'll use the literal translation for now, but I'd like an opinion from the other translator too(especially the one translating this series) since this naming format are going to be used in other volume too. Thanks ^^--[[User:Kuroi shinigami\|User:Kuroi shinigami]] 11:26, 20 February 2011 (UTC)		I have a problem about the IS form naming format. When Personal IS is unused, they are stored in an accessory form. Zephyr from Animesuki Forum gave a good name to that form called closed form(and open form for the battle mode), while the literal translation is specialized mechanism form(得機形態) which one do you think is better to be used? I'll use the literal translation for now, but I'd like an opinion from all the other translator too(especially the one translating this series) since this naming format are going to be used in other volume too. Thanks ^^--[[User:Kuroi shinigami\|User:Kuroi shinigami]] 11:26, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

	"The other translator translating this series" sounds a bit rude. LOL, just joking.		"The other translator translating this series" sounds a bit rude. LOL, just joking.
	Well, you see, I think it's better to stick with the litteral term until the series is finished (which will take a bit of time) since the author could use the terms in the story for a pun or something like that. There could be also a term the author will create in the next novels (V7, V8, etc.) which will have a link with the litteral name. For now I would recommend creating a term list and its translation so that the translations look alike. Well, after all, I won't need to translate some IS terms for now, so do as you wish.[[User:Kira0802\|Kira0802]] 19:54, 20 February 2011 (UTC)		Well, you see, I think it's better to stick with the litteral term until the series is finished (which will take a bit of time) since the author could use the terms in the story for a pun or something like that. There could be also a term the author will create in the next novels (V7, V8, etc.) which will have a link with the litteral name. For now I would recommend creating a term list and its translation so that the translations look alike. Well, after all, I won't need to translate some IS terms for now, so do as you wish.[[User:Kira0802\|Kira0802]] 19:54, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

			Sorry bout that XD. My English is not that good to find a better word for that XD.--[[User:Kuroi shinigami\|Kuroi shinigami]] 10:47, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Kira0802: /* --Standard Format-- */

2011-02-20T19:54:15Z

--Standard Format--

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:54, 20 February 2011
Line 98:		Line 98:

	I have a problem about the IS form naming format. When Personal IS is unused, they are stored in an accessory form. Zephyr from Animesuki Forum gave a good name to that form called closed form(and open form for the battle mode), while the literal translation is specialized mechanism form(得機形態) which one do you think is better to be used? I'll use the literal translation for now, but I'd like an opinion from the other translator too(especially the one translating this series) since this naming format are going to be used in other volume too. Thanks ^^--[[User:Kuroi shinigami\|User:Kuroi shinigami]] 11:26, 20 February 2011 (UTC)		I have a problem about the IS form naming format. When Personal IS is unused, they are stored in an accessory form. Zephyr from Animesuki Forum gave a good name to that form called closed form(and open form for the battle mode), while the literal translation is specialized mechanism form(得機形態) which one do you think is better to be used? I'll use the literal translation for now, but I'd like an opinion from the other translator too(especially the one translating this series) since this naming format are going to be used in other volume too. Thanks ^^--[[User:Kuroi shinigami\|User:Kuroi shinigami]] 11:26, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

			"The other translator translating this series" sounds a bit rude. LOL, just joking.
			Well, you see, I think it's better to stick with the litteral term until the series is finished (which will take a bit of time) since the author could use the terms in the story for a pun or something like that. There could be also a term the author will create in the next novels (V7, V8, etc.) which will have a link with the litteral name. For now I would recommend creating a term list and its translation so that the translations look alike. Well, after all, I won't need to translate some IS terms for now, so do as you wish.[[User:Kira0802\|Kira0802]] 19:54, 20 February 2011 (UTC)