Talk:Kokoro Connect:Volume 1 Chapter 7 - Revision history

Michpig at 18:33, 14 September 2012

2012-09-14T18:33:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:33, 14 September 2012
Line 15:		Line 15:

	Could someone clarify what was meant in the first clause? I'm guessing something along the lines of "being caught trying to lie his way out of the situation".		Could someone clarify what was meant in the first clause? I'm guessing something along the lines of "being caught trying to lie his way out of the situation".
			That said, I'm making a pretty big edit that I'll upload in the next few days, so please bear with me and voice your concerns! I hope I don't come across as being impetuous..
	--[[User:Michpig\|Michpig]] ([[User talk:Michpig\|talk]]) 12:55, 14 September 2012 (CDT)		--[[User:Michpig\|Michpig]] ([[User talk:Michpig\|talk]]) 12:55, 14 September 2012 (CDT)

Michpig at 17:55, 14 September 2012

2012-09-14T17:55:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:55, 14 September 2012
Line 11:		Line 11:
	I don't know about the original text, but currently that's pretty awkward. "Although, if..." or "As long as your..." would sound a bit better. As for "don't get so entangled"... I don't know. Remove so? Does that change the original meaning too much?		I don't know about the original text, but currently that's pretty awkward. "Although, if..." or "As long as your..." would sound a bit better. As for "don't get so entangled"... I don't know. Remove so? Does that change the original meaning too much?
	--[[User:Michpig\|Michpig]] ([[User talk:Michpig\|talk]]) 14:57, 13 September 2012 (CDT)		--[[User:Michpig\|Michpig]] ([[User talk:Michpig\|talk]]) 14:57, 13 September 2012 (CDT)

			Being seen his getting away, Taichi could only defend himself to dispatch her.

			Could someone clarify what was meant in the first clause? I'm guessing something along the lines of "being caught trying to lie his way out of the situation".
			--[[User:Michpig\|Michpig]] ([[User talk:Michpig\|talk]]) 12:55, 14 September 2012 (CDT)

Michpig: /* Editing */

2012-09-13T20:32:05Z

Editing

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:32, 13 September 2012
Line 3:		Line 3:
	"But if you would become a triangular relationship...		"But if you would become a triangular relationship...

	The term "triangular relationship" feels much more awkward than, say, "love triangle". You can still continue the joke with "love square" or, if you so wish, rectangle or quadrilateral. I changed it, but please give your opinions.		The term "triangular relationship" feels much more awkward than, say, "love triangle". You can still continue the joke with "love square" or, if you so wish, rectangle or quadrilateral. I changed it, but please give your opinions. I realise that "triangular relationship" is more of a direct translation, and might fuel the next line.

	As well, the following line:		As well, the following line:

Michpig at 20:31, 13 September 2012

2012-09-13T20:31:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:31, 13 September 2012
Line 3:		Line 3:
	"But if you would become a triangular relationship...		"But if you would become a triangular relationship...

	The term "triangular relationship" feels much more awkward than, say, "love triangle". You can still continue the joke with "love square" or, if you so wish, rectangle or quadrilateral.		The term "triangular relationship" feels much more awkward than, say, "love triangle". You can still continue the joke with "love square" or, if you so wish, rectangle or quadrilateral. I changed it, but please give your opinions.
			As well, the following line:

			...If your relationships don't get so entangled, it's fine with me

			I don't know about the original text, but currently that's pretty awkward. "Although, if..." or "As long as your..." would sound a bit better. As for "don't get so entangled"... I don't know. Remove so? Does that change the original meaning too much?
	--[[User:Michpig\|Michpig]] ([[User talk:Michpig\|talk]]) 14:57, 13 September 2012 (CDT)		--[[User:Michpig\|Michpig]] ([[User talk:Michpig\|talk]]) 14:57, 13 September 2012 (CDT)

Michpig: /* Editing */

2012-09-13T20:17:46Z

Editing

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:17, 13 September 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	=== Editing ===		=== Editing ===

	"But if you would become a triangular relationship...		"But if you would become a triangular relationship...

	The term "triangular relationship" feels much more awkward than, say, "love triangle". You can still continue the joke with "love square" or, if you so wish, rectangle or quadrilateral.		The term "triangular relationship" feels much more awkward than, say, "love triangle". You can still continue the joke with "love square" or, if you so wish, rectangle or quadrilateral.
	--[[User:Michpig\|Michpig]] ([[User talk:Michpig\|talk]]) 14:57, 13 September 2012 (CDT)		--[[User:Michpig\|Michpig]] ([[User talk:Michpig\|talk]]) 14:57, 13 September 2012 (CDT)

Michpig: Created page with "=== Editing === "But if you would become a triangular relationship... The term "triangular relationship" feels much more awkward than, say, "love triangle". You can still co..."

2012-09-13T19:57:40Z

Created page with "=== Editing === "But if you would become a triangular relationship... The term "triangular relationship" feels much more awkward than, say, "love triangle". You can still co..."

New page

=== Editing ===

"But if you would become a triangular relationship...

The term "triangular relationship" feels much more awkward than, say, "love triangle". You can still continue the joke with "love square" or, if you so wish, rectangle or quadrilateral.
--[[User:Michpig|Michpig]] ([[User talk:Michpig|talk]]) 14:57, 13 September 2012 (CDT)