Talk:Seirei Tsukai no Blade Dance:Volume2 Chapter7 - Revision history

KuroiHikari: /* Part 3 */

2012-10-13T03:28:38Z

Part 3

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:28, 13 October 2012
Line 33:		Line 33:

	This wasn't an opponent whom he could decide the victory with one blow, like the rampaging giant spirit at Mine Town. -- I think this should be Academy Town? They haven't fought a giant at mine town only the skeletons and Rinslet took them down.		This wasn't an opponent whom he could decide the victory with one blow, like the rampaging giant spirit at Mine Town. -- I think this should be Academy Town? They haven't fought a giant at mine town only the skeletons and Rinslet took them down.

			Yes, this one is my mistake, although, it's weird that it's left undetected for so long. --[[User:KuroiHikari\|KuroiHikari]] ([[User_talk:KuroiHikari\|Talk]] \| ) 22:28, 12 October 2012 (CDT)

Drowzycow: want to change Mine Town to Academy Town in one of the lines

2012-10-12T21:05:02Z

want to change Mine Town to Academy Town in one of the lines

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:05, 12 October 2012
Line 29:		Line 29:

	Zero2001: Needs revising. I can't understand what the spirits were enjoying.		Zero2001: Needs revising. I can't understand what the spirits were enjoying.

			==Part 3==

			This wasn't an opponent whom he could decide the victory with one blow, like the rampaging giant spirit at Mine Town. -- I think this should be Academy Town? They haven't fought a giant at mine town only the skeletons and Rinslet took them down.

Drowzycow: moved a note for translators to discussion. A line of text needs revising, it doesn't make any sense.

2012-10-12T20:08:24Z

moved a note for translators to discussion. A line of text needs revising, it doesn't make any sense.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:08, 12 October 2012
Line 24:		Line 24:

	In that line I guess 'him' isn't required, as it isn't in the original text as well. --[[User:KuroiHikari\|KuroiHikari]] ([[User_talk:KuroiHikari\|Talk]] \| ) 21:35, 18 June 2012 (CDT)		In that line I guess 'him' isn't required, as it isn't in the original text as well. --[[User:KuroiHikari\|KuroiHikari]] ([[User_talk:KuroiHikari\|Talk]] \| ) 21:35, 18 June 2012 (CDT)

			==Part 1==
			The grand shrine, which had its sculptures destroyed, had the spirit ores inlayed in its stone pillar robbed and had let spirits enjoy themselves, had transformed into a ruin that was even tragic to look at.

			Zero2001: Needs revising. I can't understand what the spirits were enjoying.

Zakashi: forgot to put my name =P

2012-06-19T02:43:21Z

forgot to put my name =P

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:43, 19 June 2012
Line 21:		Line 21:
	I checked it again. Use 'mowed down with'. Using simply 'mowed down Est' will mean that the attack was on Est and not on Jio. See this [http://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/mow+down example]. You were correct. --[[User:Chancs\|Chancs]] 00:24, 5 June 2012 (CDT)		I checked it again. Use 'mowed down with'. Using simply 'mowed down Est' will mean that the attack was on Est and not on Jio. See this [http://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/mow+down example]. You were correct. --[[User:Chancs\|Chancs]] 00:24, 5 June 2012 (CDT)

	Hi, regarding the use of "mow down" in part 3, is "him" needed in the action of mowing down? I have removed "him" for now but if we put it as "mowed down him", it would suggest that Jio has been cut by Est but it is not so. By removing "him", it would more of describe the action of Kamito cutting down on Jio with Est.		Hi, regarding the use of "mow down" in part 3, is "him" needed in the action of mowing down? I have removed "him" for now but if we put it as "mowed down him", it would suggest that Jio has been cut by Est but it is not so. By removing "him", it would more of describe the action of Kamito cutting down on Jio with Est. [[User:Zakashi\|Zakashi]] 21:43, 18 June 2012 (CDT)

	In that line I guess 'him' isn't required, as it isn't in the original text as well. --[[User:KuroiHikari\|KuroiHikari]] ([[User_talk:KuroiHikari\|Talk]] \| ) 21:35, 18 June 2012 (CDT)		In that line I guess 'him' isn't required, as it isn't in the original text as well. --[[User:KuroiHikari\|KuroiHikari]] ([[User_talk:KuroiHikari\|Talk]] \| ) 21:35, 18 June 2012 (CDT)

KuroiHikari at 02:35, 19 June 2012

2012-06-19T02:35:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:35, 19 June 2012
Line 22:		Line 22:

	Hi, regarding the use of "mow down" in part 3, is "him" needed in the action of mowing down? I have removed "him" for now but if we put it as "mowed down him", it would suggest that Jio has been cut by Est but it is not so. By removing "him", it would more of describe the action of Kamito cutting down on Jio with Est.		Hi, regarding the use of "mow down" in part 3, is "him" needed in the action of mowing down? I have removed "him" for now but if we put it as "mowed down him", it would suggest that Jio has been cut by Est but it is not so. By removing "him", it would more of describe the action of Kamito cutting down on Jio with Est.

			In that line I guess 'him' isn't required, as it isn't in the original text as well. --[[User:KuroiHikari\|KuroiHikari]] ([[User_talk:KuroiHikari\|Talk]] \| ) 21:35, 18 June 2012 (CDT)

Zakashi at 02:16, 19 June 2012

2012-06-19T02:16:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:16, 19 June 2012
Line 20:		Line 20:

	I checked it again. Use 'mowed down with'. Using simply 'mowed down Est' will mean that the attack was on Est and not on Jio. See this [http://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/mow+down example]. You were correct. --[[User:Chancs\|Chancs]] 00:24, 5 June 2012 (CDT)		I checked it again. Use 'mowed down with'. Using simply 'mowed down Est' will mean that the attack was on Est and not on Jio. See this [http://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/mow+down example]. You were correct. --[[User:Chancs\|Chancs]] 00:24, 5 June 2012 (CDT)

			Hi, regarding the use of "mow down" in part 3, is "him" needed in the action of mowing down? I have removed "him" for now but if we put it as "mowed down him", it would suggest that Jio has been cut by Est but it is not so. By removing "him", it would more of describe the action of Kamito cutting down on Jio with Est.

Chancs at 05:24, 5 June 2012

2012-06-05T05:24:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:24, 5 June 2012
Line 18:		Line 18:

	The issue I have is more of the way that phrase in English will be perceived or interpreted. --[[User:KuroiHikari\|KuroiHikari]] 18:35, 4 June 2012 (CDT)		The issue I have is more of the way that phrase in English will be perceived or interpreted. --[[User:KuroiHikari\|KuroiHikari]] 18:35, 4 June 2012 (CDT)

			I checked it again. Use 'mowed down with'. Using simply 'mowed down Est' will mean that the attack was on Est and not on Jio. See this [http://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/mow+down example]. You were correct. --[[User:Chancs\|Chancs]] 00:24, 5 June 2012 (CDT)

KuroiHikari at 23:35, 4 June 2012

2012-06-04T23:35:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:35, 4 June 2012
Line 12:		Line 12:

	First and foremost, can you please provide the original Japanese text here so that we can understand what is being said? Romaji would be nice but if it's the Japanese characters I can convert them to romaji and then understand what is being said. [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 11:06, 4 June 2012 (CDT)		First and foremost, can you please provide the original Japanese text here so that we can understand what is being said? Romaji would be nice but if it's the Japanese characters I can convert them to romaji and then understand what is being said. [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 11:06, 4 June 2012 (CDT)

			Here you go: 踏み込んだカミトが、両手でテルミヌス・エストを薙いだ。

			fumikonda Kamito ga, ryoute de Terminus Est wo naida.

			The issue I have is more of the way that phrase in English will be perceived or interpreted. --[[User:KuroiHikari\|KuroiHikari]] 18:35, 4 June 2012 (CDT)

Zero2001 at 16:06, 4 June 2012

2012-06-04T16:06:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:06, 4 June 2012
Line 10:		Line 10:

	Use the latter since it is Kamito who is attacking and pressuring Jio with Est. --[[User:Chancs\|Chancs]] 08:05, 4 June 2012 (CDT)		Use the latter since it is Kamito who is attacking and pressuring Jio with Est. --[[User:Chancs\|Chancs]] 08:05, 4 June 2012 (CDT)

			First and foremost, can you please provide the original Japanese text here so that we can understand what is being said? Romaji would be nice but if it's the Japanese characters I can convert them to romaji and then understand what is being said. [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 11:06, 4 June 2012 (CDT)

Chancs at 13:05, 4 June 2012

2012-06-04T13:05:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:05, 4 June 2012
Line 8:		Line 8:

	The issue is whether it should be 'mowed down with Terminus Est' or 'mowed down Terminus Est'. The latter implies that the action 'moved down' is done on 'Terminus Est', no? --[[User:KuroiHikari\|KuroiHikari]] 03:15, 4 June 2012 (CDT)		The issue is whether it should be 'mowed down with Terminus Est' or 'mowed down Terminus Est'. The latter implies that the action 'moved down' is done on 'Terminus Est', no? --[[User:KuroiHikari\|KuroiHikari]] 03:15, 4 June 2012 (CDT)

			Use the latter since it is Kamito who is attacking and pressuring Jio with Est. --[[User:Chancs\|Chancs]] 08:05, 4 June 2012 (CDT)