Talk:Seirei Tsukai no Blade Dance:Volume2 Chapter9 - Revision history

KuroiHikari: /* Sentence's meaning */

2013-08-24T11:21:57Z

Sentence's meaning

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:21, 24 August 2013
Line 46:		Line 46:
	"Besides, no matter how powerful Est's elemental waffe was, it was strange that a sword spirit, famous for being the toughest in its endurance, was broken that easily."		"Besides, no matter how powerful Est's elemental waffe was, it was strange that a sword spirit, famous for being the toughest in its endurance, was broken that easily."
	From this sentence, it looks like it was Est who was broken, but that's not the case and I don't actually remember any famous swords breaking in this or previous chapter. Could someone specify exactly what blade the author is talking about.[[User:asiorx22\|asiorx22]]([[User talk:asiorx22\|talk]]) 18 august 2013		From this sentence, it looks like it was Est who was broken, but that's not the case and I don't actually remember any famous swords breaking in this or previous chapter. Could someone specify exactly what blade the author is talking about.[[User:asiorx22\|asiorx22]]([[User talk:asiorx22\|talk]]) 18 august 2013

			It's generalizing sword spirits. Maybe famous is not the best word choice. Basically, sword spirits are well-known for being tough and shouldn't break easily. --[[User:KuroiHikari\|KuroiHikari]] ([[User_talk:KuroiHikari\|Talk]] \| ) 06:21, 24 August 2013 (CDT)

Asiorx22: /* Sentence's meaning */

2013-08-18T15:38:09Z

Sentence's meaning

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:38, 18 August 2013
Line 45:		Line 45:
	In part 2		In part 2
	"Besides, no matter how powerful Est's elemental waffe was, it was strange that a sword spirit, famous for being the toughest in its endurance, was broken that easily."		"Besides, no matter how powerful Est's elemental waffe was, it was strange that a sword spirit, famous for being the toughest in its endurance, was broken that easily."
	From this sentence, it looks like it was Est who was broken, but that's not the case and I don't actually remember any famous swords breaking in this or previous chapter. Could someone specify exactly what blade the author is talking about.[[User:asiorx22\|asiorx22]]([[User talk:asiorx22\|talk]])		From this sentence, it looks like it was Est who was broken, but that's not the case and I don't actually remember any famous swords breaking in this or previous chapter. Could someone specify exactly what blade the author is talking about.[[User:asiorx22\|asiorx22]]([[User talk:asiorx22\|talk]]) 18 august 2013

Asiorx22: /* Sentence's meaning */

2013-08-18T15:35:58Z

Sentence's meaning

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:35, 18 August 2013
Line 45:		Line 45:
	In part 2		In part 2
	"Besides, no matter how powerful Est's elemental waffe was, it was strange that a sword spirit, famous for being the toughest in its endurance, was broken that easily."		"Besides, no matter how powerful Est's elemental waffe was, it was strange that a sword spirit, famous for being the toughest in its endurance, was broken that easily."
	From this sentence, it looks like it was Est who was broken, but that's not the case and I don't actually remember any famous swords breaking in this or previous chapter. Could someone specify exactly what blade the ~~autor~~ is ~~talkong~~ about.([[User talk:asiorx22\|talk]])		From this sentence, it looks like it was Est who was broken, but that's not the case and I don't actually remember any famous swords breaking in this or previous chapter. Could someone specify exactly what blade the author is talking about.[[User:asiorx22\|asiorx22]]([[User talk:asiorx22\|talk]])

Asiorx22: /* Sentence's meaning */

2013-08-18T15:34:01Z

Sentence's meaning

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:34, 18 August 2013
Line 41:		Line 41:

	I was thinking along the lines of using "inadequate, inappropriate or inaccurate". Simplifying it to "it's just 'wrong'" seems great too. I'll leave it to you to decide the best way to phrase it. :p. [[User:Zakashi\|Zakashi]] ([[User talk:Zakashi\|talk]]) 06:22, 31 March 2013 (CDT)		I was thinking along the lines of using "inadequate, inappropriate or inaccurate". Simplifying it to "it's just 'wrong'" seems great too. I'll leave it to you to decide the best way to phrase it. :p. [[User:Zakashi\|Zakashi]] ([[User talk:Zakashi\|talk]]) 06:22, 31 March 2013 (CDT)


			In part 2
			"Besides, no matter how powerful Est's elemental waffe was, it was strange that a sword spirit, famous for being the toughest in its endurance, was broken that easily."
			From this sentence, it looks like it was Est who was broken, but that's not the case and I don't actually remember any famous swords breaking in this or previous chapter. Could someone specify exactly what blade the autor is talkong about.([[User talk:asiorx22\|talk]])

Zakashi: /* Sentence's meaning */

2013-03-31T11:22:19Z

Sentence's meaning

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:22, 31 March 2013
Line 39:		Line 39:

	Yes, that would be correct.--[[User:KuroiHikari\|KuroiHikari]] ([[User_talk:KuroiHikari\|Talk]] \| ) 02:42, 30 March 2013 (CDT)		Yes, that would be correct.--[[User:KuroiHikari\|KuroiHikari]] ([[User_talk:KuroiHikari\|Talk]] \| ) 02:42, 30 March 2013 (CDT)

			I was thinking along the lines of using "inadequate, inappropriate or inaccurate". Simplifying it to "it's just 'wrong'" seems great too. I'll leave it to you to decide the best way to phrase it. :p. [[User:Zakashi\|Zakashi]] ([[User talk:Zakashi\|talk]]) 06:22, 31 March 2013 (CDT)

KuroiHikari: /* Sentence's meaning */

2013-03-30T07:42:32Z

Sentence's meaning

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:42, 30 March 2013
Line 37:		Line 37:

	Oops, I didn't read the whole context since I read it in the edit differences, sorry about that. Just to clarify, would the word here in a sense express that there are flaws to Jio's claim to be the Demon King given the limitations of his ability? Thanks. [[User:Zakashi\|Zakashi]] ([[User talk:Zakashi\|talk]]) 02:22, 30 March 2013 (CDT)		Oops, I didn't read the whole context since I read it in the edit differences, sorry about that. Just to clarify, would the word here in a sense express that there are flaws to Jio's claim to be the Demon King given the limitations of his ability? Thanks. [[User:Zakashi\|Zakashi]] ([[User talk:Zakashi\|talk]]) 02:22, 30 March 2013 (CDT)

			Yes, that would be correct.--[[User:KuroiHikari\|KuroiHikari]] ([[User_talk:KuroiHikari\|Talk]] \| ) 02:42, 30 March 2013 (CDT)

Zakashi at 07:23, 30 March 2013

2013-03-30T07:23:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:23, 30 March 2013
Line 36:		Line 36:
	Actually, that line is referring to Jio. "It's just 'wrong' to call him an elementalist." is how I'll simplify it. I've to admit 'imperfect' is not that of a good choice of wrong. Could you suggest a word along the lines of faulty? --[[User:KuroiHikari\|KuroiHikari]] ([[User_talk:KuroiHikari\|Talk]] \| ) 08:37, 28 March 2013 (CDT)		Actually, that line is referring to Jio. "It's just 'wrong' to call him an elementalist." is how I'll simplify it. I've to admit 'imperfect' is not that of a good choice of wrong. Could you suggest a word along the lines of faulty? --[[User:KuroiHikari\|KuroiHikari]] ([[User_talk:KuroiHikari\|Talk]] \| ) 08:37, 28 March 2013 (CDT)

	Oops, I didn't read the whole context since I read it in the edit differences, sorry about that. Just to clarify, would the word here in a sense ~~imply~~ that there are flaws to Jio's claim to be the Demon King? Thanks. [[User:Zakashi\|Zakashi]] ([[User talk:Zakashi\|talk]]) 02:22, 30 March 2013 (CDT)		Oops, I didn't read the whole context since I read it in the edit differences, sorry about that. Just to clarify, would the word here in a sense express that there are flaws to Jio's claim to be the Demon King given the limitations of his ability? Thanks. [[User:Zakashi\|Zakashi]] ([[User talk:Zakashi\|talk]]) 02:22, 30 March 2013 (CDT)

Zakashi at 07:22, 30 March 2013

2013-03-30T07:22:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:22, 30 March 2013
Line 35:		Line 35:

	Actually, that line is referring to Jio. "It's just 'wrong' to call him an elementalist." is how I'll simplify it. I've to admit 'imperfect' is not that of a good choice of wrong. Could you suggest a word along the lines of faulty? --[[User:KuroiHikari\|KuroiHikari]] ([[User_talk:KuroiHikari\|Talk]] \| ) 08:37, 28 March 2013 (CDT)		Actually, that line is referring to Jio. "It's just 'wrong' to call him an elementalist." is how I'll simplify it. I've to admit 'imperfect' is not that of a good choice of wrong. Could you suggest a word along the lines of faulty? --[[User:KuroiHikari\|KuroiHikari]] ([[User_talk:KuroiHikari\|Talk]] \| ) 08:37, 28 March 2013 (CDT)

			Oops, I didn't read the whole context since I read it in the edit differences, sorry about that. Just to clarify, would the word here in a sense imply that there are flaws to Jio's claim to be the Demon King? Thanks. [[User:Zakashi\|Zakashi]] ([[User talk:Zakashi\|talk]]) 02:22, 30 March 2013 (CDT)

KuroiHikari: /* Sentence's meaning */

2013-03-28T13:37:56Z

Sentence's meaning

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:37, 28 March 2013
Line 33:		Line 33:
	==Sentence's meaning==		==Sentence's meaning==
	Hi, in part 2, "However, it was greatly imperfect for him to call himself the Demon King— an elementalist.", "imperfect" has been replaced by "incomplete" in an edit. The sentence sounds a bit awkward here. May I know if the sentence here means that Kamito's strength is still not yet on par with the Demon King's? If it is so, would it be better to rephrase it? Thanks. [[User:Zakashi\|Zakashi]] ([[User talk:Zakashi\|talk]]) 08:16, 28 March 2013 (CDT)		Hi, in part 2, "However, it was greatly imperfect for him to call himself the Demon King— an elementalist.", "imperfect" has been replaced by "incomplete" in an edit. The sentence sounds a bit awkward here. May I know if the sentence here means that Kamito's strength is still not yet on par with the Demon King's? If it is so, would it be better to rephrase it? Thanks. [[User:Zakashi\|Zakashi]] ([[User talk:Zakashi\|talk]]) 08:16, 28 March 2013 (CDT)

			Actually, that line is referring to Jio. "It's just 'wrong' to call him an elementalist." is how I'll simplify it. I've to admit 'imperfect' is not that of a good choice of wrong. Could you suggest a word along the lines of faulty? --[[User:KuroiHikari\|KuroiHikari]] ([[User_talk:KuroiHikari\|Talk]] \| ) 08:37, 28 March 2013 (CDT)

Zakashi at 13:16, 28 March 2013

2013-03-28T13:16:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:16, 28 March 2013
Line 30:		Line 30:

	The first lightning attack had '''countless black lightning''' attacks/strikes. The second was a '''single''' lightning strike with many times the power of the previous attack (possibly because there was only one lightning strike so the power was also concentrated). This is what I understood. [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 01:20, 21 June 2012 (CDT)		The first lightning attack had '''countless black lightning''' attacks/strikes. The second was a '''single''' lightning strike with many times the power of the previous attack (possibly because there was only one lightning strike so the power was also concentrated). This is what I understood. [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 01:20, 21 June 2012 (CDT)

			==Sentence's meaning==
			Hi, in part 2, "However, it was greatly imperfect for him to call himself the Demon King— an elementalist.", "imperfect" has been replaced by "incomplete" in an edit. The sentence sounds a bit awkward here. May I know if the sentence here means that Kamito's strength is still not yet on par with the Demon King's? If it is so, would it be better to rephrase it? Thanks. [[User:Zakashi\|Zakashi]] ([[User talk:Zakashi\|talk]]) 08:16, 28 March 2013 (CDT)