Talk:Seirei Tsukai no Blade Dance:Volume3 Chapter1 - Revision history

Zero2001: /* Zero2001_2 */

2012-07-05T15:02:13Z

Zero2001_2

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:02, 5 July 2012
Line 28:		Line 28:

	It's fine, "that" can be used on its own, but I'll italicize it anyway. --[[User:KuroiHikari\|KuroiHikari]] ([[User_talk:KuroiHikari\|Talk]] \| ) 07:06, 5 July 2012 (CDT)		It's fine, "that" can be used on its own, but I'll italicize it anyway. --[[User:KuroiHikari\|KuroiHikari]] ([[User_talk:KuroiHikari\|Talk]] \| ) 07:06, 5 July 2012 (CDT)

			Thanks. [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 10:02, 5 July 2012 (CDT)

2012-07-05T12:06:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:06, 5 July 2012
Line 26:		Line 26:

	Hmm. No I don't think so. Emphasis on "that" is necessary. It's just that type of sentence. Otherwise it seems like the sentence is incomplete. [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 06:17, 5 July 2012 (CDT)		Hmm. No I don't think so. Emphasis on "that" is necessary. It's just that type of sentence. Otherwise it seems like the sentence is incomplete. [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 06:17, 5 July 2012 (CDT)

			It's fine, "that" can be used on its own, but I'll italicize it anyway. --[[User:KuroiHikari\|KuroiHikari]] ([[User_talk:KuroiHikari\|Talk]] \| ) 07:06, 5 July 2012 (CDT)

2012-07-05T11:17:33Z

Zero2001_2

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:17, 5 July 2012
Line 24:		Line 24:

	Yes, "aren't you?" should have been added, but the emphasis isn't required. --[[User:KuroiHikari\|KuroiHikari]] ([[User_talk:KuroiHikari\|Talk]] \| ) 05:15, 5 July 2012 (CDT)		Yes, "aren't you?" should have been added, but the emphasis isn't required. --[[User:KuroiHikari\|KuroiHikari]] ([[User_talk:KuroiHikari\|Talk]] \| ) 05:15, 5 July 2012 (CDT)

			Hmm. No I don't think so. Emphasis on "that" is necessary. It's just that type of sentence. Otherwise it seems like the sentence is incomplete. [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 06:17, 5 July 2012 (CDT)

2012-07-05T10:15:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:15, 5 July 2012
Line 9:		Line 9:

	I see... the word 悔しい (Kuyashī) has been used. Indeed it can be translated to "vexing" ''in some circumstances''. However, here it would be more prudent to translate it to: "mortifying" or "frustrating". What do you think? [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 03:46, 5 July 2012 (CDT)		I see... the word 悔しい (Kuyashī) has been used. Indeed it can be translated to "vexing" ''in some circumstances''. However, here it would be more prudent to translate it to: "mortifying" or "frustrating". What do you think? [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 03:46, 5 July 2012 (CDT)

			I guess mortifying is better. --[[User:KuroiHikari\|KuroiHikari]] ([[User_talk:KuroiHikari\|Talk]] \| ) 05:15, 5 July 2012 (CDT)

	===Zero2001_2===		===Zero2001_2===
Line 20:		Line 22:

	Or rather. Changing part of it to "you're surprisingly '''that''', aren't you?" is more closer to the original. [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 03:51, 5 July 2012 (CDT)		Or rather. Changing part of it to "you're surprisingly '''that''', aren't you?" is more closer to the original. [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 03:51, 5 July 2012 (CDT)

			Yes, "aren't you?" should have been added, but the emphasis isn't required. --[[User:KuroiHikari\|KuroiHikari]] ([[User_talk:KuroiHikari\|Talk]] \| ) 05:15, 5 July 2012 (CDT)

2012-07-05T08:52:45Z

Zero2001_1

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:52, 5 July 2012
Line 8:		Line 8:
	--[[User:KuroiHikari\|KuroiHikari]] ([[User_talk:KuroiHikari\|Talk]] \| ) 18:18, 4 July 2012 (CDT)		--[[User:KuroiHikari\|KuroiHikari]] ([[User_talk:KuroiHikari\|Talk]] \| ) 18:18, 4 July 2012 (CDT)

	I see... the word 悔しい (Kuyashī) has been used. Indeed it can be translated to "vexing" ''in some circumstances''. However, here it would be more prudent to translate it to: "mortifying" or "frustrating". What do you think. [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 03:46, 5 July 2012 (CDT)		I see... the word 悔しい (Kuyashī) has been used. Indeed it can be translated to "vexing" ''in some circumstances''. However, here it would be more prudent to translate it to: "mortifying" or "frustrating". What do you think? [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 03:46, 5 July 2012 (CDT)

	===Zero2001_2===		===Zero2001_2===

2012-07-05T08:52:29Z

Zero2001_1

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:52, 5 July 2012
Line 8:		Line 8:
	--[[User:KuroiHikari\|KuroiHikari]] ([[User_talk:KuroiHikari\|Talk]] \| ) 18:18, 4 July 2012 (CDT)		--[[User:KuroiHikari\|KuroiHikari]] ([[User_talk:KuroiHikari\|Talk]] \| ) 18:18, 4 July 2012 (CDT)

	I see... the word 悔しい (Kuyashī) has been used. Indeed it can be translated to "vexing" ''in some circumstances''. However, here it would be more prudent to translate it to: "mortifying" or "frustrating". [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 03:46, 5 July 2012 (CDT)		I see... the word 悔しい (Kuyashī) has been used. Indeed it can be translated to "vexing" ''in some circumstances''. However, here it would be more prudent to translate it to: "mortifying" or "frustrating". What do you think. [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 03:46, 5 July 2012 (CDT)

	===Zero2001_2===		===Zero2001_2===

2012-07-05T08:51:52Z

Zero2001_2

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:51, 5 July 2012
Line 19:		Line 19:
	I see. Then I'll put emphasis on "that". [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 03:48, 5 July 2012 (CDT)		I see. Then I'll put emphasis on "that". [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 03:48, 5 July 2012 (CDT)

	Or rather. ~~Canging~~ part of it to "you're surprisingly '''that''', aren't you?" is more closer to the original. [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 03:51, 5 July 2012 (CDT)		Or rather. Changing part of it to "you're surprisingly '''that''', aren't you?" is more closer to the original. [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 03:51, 5 July 2012 (CDT)

2012-07-05T08:51:32Z

Zero2001_2

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:51, 5 July 2012
Line 18:		Line 18:

	I see. Then I'll put emphasis on "that". [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 03:48, 5 July 2012 (CDT)		I see. Then I'll put emphasis on "that". [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 03:48, 5 July 2012 (CDT)

			Or rather. Canging part of it to "you're surprisingly '''that''', aren't you?" is more closer to the original. [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 03:51, 5 July 2012 (CDT)

2012-07-05T08:48:02Z

Zero2001_2

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:48, 5 July 2012
Line 16:		Line 16:

	There's nothing else. --[[User:KuroiHikari\|KuroiHikari]] ([[User_talk:KuroiHikari\|Talk]] \| ) 18:18, 4 July 2012 (CDT)		There's nothing else. --[[User:KuroiHikari\|KuroiHikari]] ([[User_talk:KuroiHikari\|Talk]] \| ) 18:18, 4 July 2012 (CDT)

			I see. Then I'll put emphasis on "that". [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 03:48, 5 July 2012 (CDT)

2012-07-05T08:46:40Z

Zero2001_1

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:46, 5 July 2012
Line 7:		Line 7:

	--[[User:KuroiHikari\|KuroiHikari]] ([[User_talk:KuroiHikari\|Talk]] \| ) 18:18, 4 July 2012 (CDT)		--[[User:KuroiHikari\|KuroiHikari]] ([[User_talk:KuroiHikari\|Talk]] \| ) 18:18, 4 July 2012 (CDT)

			I see... the word 悔しい (Kuyashī) has been used. Indeed it can be translated to "vexing" ''in some circumstances''. However, here it would be more prudent to translate it to: "mortifying" or "frustrating". [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 03:46, 5 July 2012 (CDT)

	===Zero2001_2===		===Zero2001_2===