Talk:Seirei Tsukai no Blade Dance:Volume3 Chapter6 - Revision history

Zero2001: /* Translation edits */

2012-08-29T20:53:35Z

Translation edits

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:53, 29 August 2012
Line 55:		Line 55:
	Ideally, all Kamito's point of view and his usage of shikkari are(should be) the same. Proper is incorrect, because a proper ojou-sama would be waited upon. --[[User:KuroiHikari\|KuroiHikari]] ([[User_talk:KuroiHikari\|Talk]] \| ) 10:03, 29 August 2012 (CDT)		Ideally, all Kamito's point of view and his usage of shikkari are(should be) the same. Proper is incorrect, because a proper ojou-sama would be waited upon. --[[User:KuroiHikari\|KuroiHikari]] ([[User_talk:KuroiHikari\|Talk]] \| ) 10:03, 29 August 2012 (CDT)

	Aren't proper ojou-sama close to the ideal yamato nadeshiko? Well ~~annyways~~, like I said, "capable" is also good. [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 15:52, 29 August 2012 (CDT)		Aren't proper ojou-sama close to the ideal yamato nadeshiko? Oh yeah, there are many different types of ojou-sama. I remember now. Well anyways, like I said, "capable" is also good. [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 15:52, 29 August 2012 (CDT)

	== Scarlet? ==		== Scarlet? ==

Zero2001: /* Translation edits */

2012-08-29T20:52:22Z

Translation edits

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:52, 29 August 2012
Line 53:		Line 53:
	Capable is also good. [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 09:57, 29 August 2012 (CDT)		Capable is also good. [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 09:57, 29 August 2012 (CDT)

	Ideally, all Kamito's point of view and his usage of shikkari are(should be) the same. Proper is incorrect, because a proper ojou-sama would be waited upon. --[[User:KuroiHikari\|KuroiHikari]] ([[User_talk:KuroiHikari\|Talk]] \| ) 10:03, 29 August 2012 (CDT)		Ideally, all Kamito's point of view and his usage of shikkari are(should be) the same. Proper is incorrect, because a proper ojou-sama would be waited upon. --[[User:KuroiHikari\|KuroiHikari]] ([[User_talk:KuroiHikari\|Talk]] \| ) 10:03, 29 August 2012 (CDT)

			Aren't proper ojou-sama close to the ideal yamato nadeshiko? Well annyways, like I said, "capable" is also good. [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 15:52, 29 August 2012 (CDT)

	== Scarlet? ==		== Scarlet? ==

KuroiHikari at 15:03, 29 August 2012

2012-08-29T15:03:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:03, 29 August 2012
Line 52:		Line 52:

	Capable is also good. [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 09:57, 29 August 2012 (CDT)		Capable is also good. [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 09:57, 29 August 2012 (CDT)

			Ideally, all Kamito's point of view and his usage of shikkari are(should be) the same. Proper is incorrect, because a proper ojou-sama would be waited upon. --[[User:KuroiHikari\|KuroiHikari]] ([[User_talk:KuroiHikari\|Talk]] \| ) 10:03, 29 August 2012 (CDT)

	== Scarlet? ==		== Scarlet? ==

Zero2001: /* Translation edits */

2012-08-29T14:57:38Z

Translation edits

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:57, 29 August 2012
Line 50:		Line 50:

	I already have. I know that (for this chapter) shikkari doesn't directly translate to "proper" or "prim and proper" but if you take the overall sentence, it is the most fitting, considering the circumstances. Translation is not just about the words but about the whole sentences (and paragraphs) as well. In fact, I think the reason why translation programs aren't so good is because their programmers have thought about words alone. If they paid attention to the sentence structure of the language, classified the words by noun, adjective, etc and programmed the system accordingly it would have been much better. [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 09:56, 29 August 2012 (CDT)		I already have. I know that (for this chapter) shikkari doesn't directly translate to "proper" or "prim and proper" but if you take the overall sentence, it is the most fitting, considering the circumstances. Translation is not just about the words but about the whole sentences (and paragraphs) as well. In fact, I think the reason why translation programs aren't so good is because their programmers have thought about words alone. If they paid attention to the sentence structure of the language, classified the words by noun, adjective, etc and programmed the system accordingly it would have been much better. [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 09:56, 29 August 2012 (CDT)

			Capable is also good. [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 09:57, 29 August 2012 (CDT)

	== Scarlet? ==		== Scarlet? ==

Zero2001: /* Translation edits */

2012-08-29T14:56:04Z

Translation edits

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:56, 29 August 2012
Line 48:		Line 48:

	Yea, let's redo that, strange, capable bothered me for a while but I now think it's alright Anyway, do offer your suggest, thanks --[[User:KuroiHikari\|KuroiHikari]] ([[User_talk:KuroiHikari\|Talk]] \| ) 07:44, 29 August 2012 (CDT)		Yea, let's redo that, strange, capable bothered me for a while but I now think it's alright Anyway, do offer your suggest, thanks --[[User:KuroiHikari\|KuroiHikari]] ([[User_talk:KuroiHikari\|Talk]] \| ) 07:44, 29 August 2012 (CDT)

			I already have. I know that (for this chapter) shikkari doesn't directly translate to "proper" or "prim and proper" but if you take the overall sentence, it is the most fitting, considering the circumstances. Translation is not just about the words but about the whole sentences (and paragraphs) as well. In fact, I think the reason why translation programs aren't so good is because their programmers have thought about words alone. If they paid attention to the sentence structure of the language, classified the words by noun, adjective, etc and programmed the system accordingly it would have been much better. [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 09:56, 29 August 2012 (CDT)

	== Scarlet? ==		== Scarlet? ==

KuroiHikari: /* Translation edits */

2012-08-29T12:48:21Z

Translation edits

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:48, 29 August 2012
Line 47:		Line 47:
	Sorry but hardworking doesn't fit, neither here nor on chapter 4. [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 07:32, 29 August 2012 (CDT)		Sorry but hardworking doesn't fit, neither here nor on chapter 4. [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 07:32, 29 August 2012 (CDT)

	Yea, let's redo that, strange, capable bothered me for a while but I now think it's alright --[[User:KuroiHikari\|KuroiHikari]] ([[User_talk:KuroiHikari\|Talk]] \| ) 07:44, 29 August 2012 (CDT)		Yea, let's redo that, strange, capable bothered me for a while but I now think it's alright Anyway, do offer your suggest, thanks --[[User:KuroiHikari\|KuroiHikari]] ([[User_talk:KuroiHikari\|Talk]] \| ) 07:44, 29 August 2012 (CDT)

	== Scarlet? ==		== Scarlet? ==

KuroiHikari at 12:44, 29 August 2012

2012-08-29T12:44:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:44, 29 August 2012
Line 46:		Line 46:

	Sorry but hardworking doesn't fit, neither here nor on chapter 4. [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 07:32, 29 August 2012 (CDT)		Sorry but hardworking doesn't fit, neither here nor on chapter 4. [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 07:32, 29 August 2012 (CDT)

			Yea, let's redo that, strange, capable bothered me for a while but I now think it's alright --[[User:KuroiHikari\|KuroiHikari]] ([[User_talk:KuroiHikari\|Talk]] \| ) 07:44, 29 August 2012 (CDT)

	== Scarlet? ==		== Scarlet? ==

Zero2001 at 12:32, 29 August 2012

2012-08-29T12:32:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:32, 29 August 2012
Line 44:		Line 44:

	Well, hmm, something better just came to mind --[[User:KuroiHikari\|KuroiHikari]] ([[User_talk:KuroiHikari\|Talk]] \| ) 20:56, 27 August 2012 (CDT)		Well, hmm, something better just came to mind --[[User:KuroiHikari\|KuroiHikari]] ([[User_talk:KuroiHikari\|Talk]] \| ) 20:56, 27 August 2012 (CDT)

			Sorry but hardworking doesn't fit, neither here nor on chapter 4. [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 07:32, 29 August 2012 (CDT)

	== Scarlet? ==		== Scarlet? ==

KuroiHikari: /* Translation edits */

2012-08-28T07:17:07Z

Translation edits

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:17, 28 August 2012
Line 29:		Line 29:
	"If I don't しっかり, I can't be an example" Hmm. I have an idea of what goes there. But I'd need the j-text for the whole line as well as your translation of it. Then I can compare both our knowledge and tell for sure. [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 07:05, 26 August 2012 (CDT)		"If I don't しっかり, I can't be an example" Hmm. I have an idea of what goes there. But I'd need the j-text for the whole line as well as your translation of it. Then I can compare both our knowledge and tell for sure. [[User:Zero2001\|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001\|Talk]] - 07:05, 26 August 2012 (CDT)

	「よく片付いてるな。しっかり者のエリスらしい」 -chp4<br/>		「よく片付いてるな。しっかり者のエリスらしい」 -chp4: You have nicely tidied up. That's just like hardworker Ellis.<br/>
	大貴族のお嬢様なのに、こういうところはすごくしっかりしている。-chp4<br/>		大貴族のお嬢様なのに、こういうところはすごくしっかりしている。-chp4: Despite being an ojou-sama of a great noble, she was very hardworking at such an area.<br/>
	「わ、私は騎士団長だぞ! 私がしっかりしなくてはみなに示しがつかん!」 -chp4		「わ、私は騎士団長だぞ! 私がしっかりしなくてはみなに示しがつかん!」 -chp4:"I-I'm the Captain! If I'm not firm, I can't be an example to everyone!"

	自分でお弁当を作るなんて、本当にしっかりしたお嬢様だ。<br/>		自分でお弁当を作るなんて、本当にしっかりしたお嬢様だ。:To even make a bento herself, she was truly a hardworking ojou-sama. <br/>
	「いや、もっと堅いっていうか、しっかりしてるというか―」		「いや、もっと堅いっていうか、しっかりしてるというか―」: "Err, more strict, or rather, hardworking or something—"

	--[[User:KuroiHikari\|KuroiHikari]] ([[User_talk:KuroiHikari\|Talk]] \| ) 19:49, 26 August 2012 (CDT)		--[[User:KuroiHikari\|KuroiHikari]] ([[User_talk:KuroiHikari\|Talk]] \| ) 19:49, 26 August 2012 (CDT)

			How's it if I change them to hardworking? The part where Ellis says しっかり is ignorable, as the context is different. The rest seems to portray Kamito's point of view. --[[User:KuroiHikari\|KuroiHikari]] ([[User_talk:KuroiHikari\|Talk]] \| ) 02:17, 28 August 2012 (CDT)

	Hi, asking about a small part in part 3,<br>		Hi, asking about a small part in part 3,<br>

KuroiHikari: /* Translation edits */

2012-08-28T01:56:56Z

Translation edits

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:56, 28 August 2012
Line 40:		Line 40:
	Hi, asking about a small part in part 3,<br>		Hi, asking about a small part in part 3,<br>
	"The topics that came to be were about the endless lectures and the books they read recently.", is there something missing after "came to be" or have I misinterpreted it? I can't seem to think of a word to put in though. Thanks for the translation :D. [[User:Zakashi\|Zakashi]] ([[User talk:Zakashi\|talk]]) 20:42, 27 August 2012 (CDT)		"The topics that came to be were about the endless lectures and the books they read recently.", is there something missing after "came to be" or have I misinterpreted it? I can't seem to think of a word to put in though. Thanks for the translation :D. [[User:Zakashi\|Zakashi]] ([[User talk:Zakashi\|talk]]) 20:42, 27 August 2012 (CDT)

			Well, hmm, something better just came to mind --[[User:KuroiHikari\|KuroiHikari]] ([[User_talk:KuroiHikari\|Talk]] \| ) 20:56, 27 August 2012 (CDT)

	== Scarlet? ==		== Scarlet? ==