Talk:Seirei Tsukai no Blade Dance:Volume8 Epilogue - Revision history

KuroiHikari: Replaced content with "Mizuho, it's your call, delete or don't delete? --~~~~"

2013-03-10T05:36:20Z

Replaced content with "Mizuho, it's your call, delete or don't delete? --~~~~"

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:36, 10 March 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~Say...since it is an unregistered user, can this epilogue be really posted as I see nothing that proves that this is done by Mizuho? --Chancs~~		Mizuho, it's your call, delete or don't delete? --[[User:KuroiHikari\|KuroiHikari]] ([[User_talk:KuroiHikari\|Talk]] \| ) 23:36, 9 March 2013 (CST)

	Just from looking at the first few lines: "A number of repaired spirit crystals were scattered about next to him." 治癒 got translated as 'repaired'. Only Mizuho could commit a translation error of this level, it's obviously him. [[User:Florza\|Florza]] ([[User talk:Florza\|talk]]) 09:12, 8 March 2013 (CST)

	~~Oye oye, atleast don't make mistakes as his/her tradrmark. :D --[[User:Chancs\|Chancs]] ([[User talk:Chancs\|talk]]) 09:50, 8 March 2013 (CST)~~

	~~How about "unwillingness to improve", then? Or maybe "stoic"? Stoic sounds nice, right?--[[User:Kadi\|Kadi]] ([[User talk:Kadi\|talk]]) 10:12, 8 March 2013 (CST)~~

	~~I do not think this belongs to~~ Mizuho ~~since it not not updated on his/her Blog. --[[User:Navazishmh\|Navazishmh]] ([[User talk:Navazishmh\|talk]]) 10:59, 8 March 2013 (CST)~~

	~~Florza. I hate to say this but your Japanese level is also very poor, so you shouldn't talk ill about others work.~~
	~~I have put down the mistranslation you have made on your translation for "Gekka no Utahime to Magi no Ou" on your user talk page.~~
	~~--[[User:TRUTH\|TRUTH]] ([[User talk:TRUTH\|talk]]) 06:10, 9 March 2013 (CST)~~

	~~Hi TRUTH,~~

	~~Thanks for your corrections. I looked them over and discussed them with florza, and they appear to be mostly valid. I will work with florza and make sure things are corrected on the Gekkahime page.~~

	But please realize that, contrary to what you are claiming, the number of errors in translation is only weakly correlated with the actual ability of the translator; I still find occasional translation mistakes in my own work when I perform routine spot checks of my old translations. Rather, it ~~all comes down to attitude and a drive to produce excellent work. And from what I've seen of florza~~'s work over the past months, he has both. What is much more distressing is when translators fall into a habit of complacent negligence (which sadly happens quite often), but florza is far from that and places great emphasis on the quality of his translations, and is humble enough to admit fault when he is wrong. And that makes him a great translator.

	~~So while I really do appreciate~~ your ~~corrections, you couldn't be drawing a more incorrect conclusion from them.~~

	~~-ND~~

	~~--[[User:NanoDesu\|NanoDesu]] ([[User talk:NanoDesu\|talk]]) 07:07, 9 March 2013 (CST)~~

	~~Then why do I see lots of fingers being pointed to Mizuho? Cant you settle it in a proper way? I only see this is bullying. We really dont need any of that here.~~

	~~--[[User:TRUTH\|TRUTH]] ([[User talk:TRUTH\|talk]]) 19:04~~, ~~9 March 2013 (CST)~~

	~~To make a general statement that has nothing to do with Mizuho~~ or any other specific translator: unfortunately, there is no way of stopping people (readers, editors, and translators alike) from criticizing other translators, even if that criticism is not put in the nicest way (and more often than not it won't be). But for any translator to fall back on the convenient excuse of "it's just bullying so I don't have to listen," as you seem to be suggesting, is the absolute worst way to deal with situations like this. ALL translators should own up to their mistakes and try their best to improve, and that includes learning to take criticism gracefully and seriously, even if such criticism is aggressively made.

	~~--[[User:NanoDesu\|NanoDesu]] ([[User talk:NanoDesu\|talk]]) 20:20, 9 March 2013 (CST)\~~

	But not all people follow your philosophy dude. And ofcourse the translator will be pissed when hordes of people smear mud over the translations in general. Then it is obvious the response will be to irk off the general public. --[[User:Chancs\|Chancs]] ([[User talk:Chancs\|talk]]) 21:48, 9 March 2013 (CST)

	~~And the epilogue is NOT DONE by Mizuho. Just confirmed it. So chill out. It's summer and its hot~~--[[User:~~Chancs~~\|~~Chancs~~]] ([[~~User talk~~:~~Chancs~~\|~~talk~~]]~~) 22:44, 9 March 2013 (CST)~~

	Whoa, I wasn't aware that "try to make translations good" was my own radical personal philosophy. I apologize deeply. I also know how to do well in math now. "Yeah, the answer is wrong by YOUR philosophy, but it's right by mine! More points please." --[[User:NanoDesu\|~~NanoDesu]] ([[User talk:NanoDesu\|talk]]) 23:14, 9 March 2013 (CST)~~

	And yes, the sarcasm was necessary. I found the idea of this being "my philosophy" so ridiculous that I just couldn't dignify it with a more serious response. I do usually try to take opposing arguments seriously, but this one was just -_-. Come on people. Seriously. --[[User:NanoDesu\|NanoDesu]] ([[User talk:NanoDesu\|talk]]) 23:29, 9 March 2013 (CST)

NanoDesu at 05:29, 10 March 2013

2013-03-10T05:29:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:29, 10 March 2013
Line 37:		Line 37:
	And the epilogue is NOT DONE by Mizuho. Just confirmed it. So chill out. It's summer and its hot--[[User:Chancs\|Chancs]] ([[User talk:Chancs\|talk]]) 22:44, 9 March 2013 (CST)		And the epilogue is NOT DONE by Mizuho. Just confirmed it. So chill out. It's summer and its hot--[[User:Chancs\|Chancs]] ([[User talk:Chancs\|talk]]) 22:44, 9 March 2013 (CST)

	Whoa, I wasn't aware that "try to make translations good" was my own radical personal philosophy. I apologize deeply. I also know how to do well in math now. "Yeah, the answer is wrong by YOUR philosophy, but it's right in mine! More points please." --[[User:NanoDesu\|NanoDesu]] ([[User talk:NanoDesu\|talk]]) 23:14, 9 March 2013 (CST)		Whoa, I wasn't aware that "try to make translations good" was my own radical personal philosophy. I apologize deeply. I also know how to do well in math now. "Yeah, the answer is wrong by YOUR philosophy, but it's right by mine! More points please." --[[User:NanoDesu\|NanoDesu]] ([[User talk:NanoDesu\|talk]]) 23:14, 9 March 2013 (CST)

			And yes, the sarcasm was necessary. I found the idea of this being "my philosophy" so ridiculous that I just couldn't dignify it with a more serious response. I do usually try to take opposing arguments seriously, but this one was just -_-. Come on people. Seriously. --[[User:NanoDesu\|NanoDesu]] ([[User talk:NanoDesu\|talk]]) 23:29, 9 March 2013 (CST)

NanoDesu at 05:14, 10 March 2013

2013-03-10T05:14:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:14, 10 March 2013
Line 36:		Line 36:

	And the epilogue is NOT DONE by Mizuho. Just confirmed it. So chill out. It's summer and its hot--[[User:Chancs\|Chancs]] ([[User talk:Chancs\|talk]]) 22:44, 9 March 2013 (CST)		And the epilogue is NOT DONE by Mizuho. Just confirmed it. So chill out. It's summer and its hot--[[User:Chancs\|Chancs]] ([[User talk:Chancs\|talk]]) 22:44, 9 March 2013 (CST)

			Whoa, I wasn't aware that "try to make translations good" was my own radical personal philosophy. I apologize deeply. I also know how to do well in math now. "Yeah, the answer is wrong by YOUR philosophy, but it's right in mine! More points please." --[[User:NanoDesu\|NanoDesu]] ([[User talk:NanoDesu\|talk]]) 23:14, 9 March 2013 (CST)

Chancs at 04:57, 10 March 2013

2013-03-10T04:57:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:57, 10 March 2013
Line 35:		Line 35:
	But not all people follow your philosophy dude. And ofcourse the translator will be pissed when hordes of people smear mud over the translations in general. Then it is obvious the response will be to irk off the general public. --[[User:Chancs\|Chancs]] ([[User talk:Chancs\|talk]]) 21:48, 9 March 2013 (CST)		But not all people follow your philosophy dude. And ofcourse the translator will be pissed when hordes of people smear mud over the translations in general. Then it is obvious the response will be to irk off the general public. --[[User:Chancs\|Chancs]] ([[User talk:Chancs\|talk]]) 21:48, 9 March 2013 (CST)

	And the epilogue is NOT DONE by Mizuho. Just confirmed it. --[[User:Chancs\|Chancs]] ([[User talk:Chancs\|talk]]) 22:44, 9 March 2013 (CST)		And the epilogue is NOT DONE by Mizuho. Just confirmed it. So chill out. It's summer and its hot--[[User:Chancs\|Chancs]] ([[User talk:Chancs\|talk]]) 22:44, 9 March 2013 (CST)

Chancs at 04:44, 10 March 2013

2013-03-10T04:44:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:44, 10 March 2013
Line 34:		Line 34:

	But not all people follow your philosophy dude. And ofcourse the translator will be pissed when hordes of people smear mud over the translations in general. Then it is obvious the response will be to irk off the general public. --[[User:Chancs\|Chancs]] ([[User talk:Chancs\|talk]]) 21:48, 9 March 2013 (CST)		But not all people follow your philosophy dude. And ofcourse the translator will be pissed when hordes of people smear mud over the translations in general. Then it is obvious the response will be to irk off the general public. --[[User:Chancs\|Chancs]] ([[User talk:Chancs\|talk]]) 21:48, 9 March 2013 (CST)

			And the epilogue is NOT DONE by Mizuho. Just confirmed it. --[[User:Chancs\|Chancs]] ([[User talk:Chancs\|talk]]) 22:44, 9 March 2013 (CST)

Chancs at 03:48, 10 March 2013

2013-03-10T03:48:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:48, 10 March 2013
Line 31:		Line 31:
	To make a general statement that has nothing to do with Mizuho or any other specific translator: unfortunately, there is no way of stopping people (readers, editors, and translators alike) from criticizing other translators, even if that criticism is not put in the nicest way (and more often than not it won't be). But for any translator to fall back on the convenient excuse of "it's just bullying so I don't have to listen," as you seem to be suggesting, is the absolute worst way to deal with situations like this. ALL translators should own up to their mistakes and try their best to improve, and that includes learning to take criticism gracefully and seriously, even if such criticism is aggressively made.		To make a general statement that has nothing to do with Mizuho or any other specific translator: unfortunately, there is no way of stopping people (readers, editors, and translators alike) from criticizing other translators, even if that criticism is not put in the nicest way (and more often than not it won't be). But for any translator to fall back on the convenient excuse of "it's just bullying so I don't have to listen," as you seem to be suggesting, is the absolute worst way to deal with situations like this. ALL translators should own up to their mistakes and try their best to improve, and that includes learning to take criticism gracefully and seriously, even if such criticism is aggressively made.

	--[[User:NanoDesu\|NanoDesu]] ([[User talk:NanoDesu\|talk]]) 20:20, 9 March 2013 (CST)		--[[User:NanoDesu\|NanoDesu]] ([[User talk:NanoDesu\|talk]]) 20:20, 9 March 2013 (CST)\

			But not all people follow your philosophy dude. And ofcourse the translator will be pissed when hordes of people smear mud over the translations in general. Then it is obvious the response will be to irk off the general public. --[[User:Chancs\|Chancs]] ([[User talk:Chancs\|talk]]) 21:48, 9 March 2013 (CST)

NanoDesu at 02:24, 10 March 2013

2013-03-10T02:24:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:24, 10 March 2013
Line 29:		Line 29:
	--[[User:TRUTH\|TRUTH]] ([[User talk:TRUTH\|talk]]) 19:04, 9 March 2013 (CST)		--[[User:TRUTH\|TRUTH]] ([[User talk:TRUTH\|talk]]) 19:04, 9 March 2013 (CST)

	To make a general statement that has nothing to do with Mizuho or any other specific translator: unfortunately, there is no way of stopping people (readers, editors, and translators alike) from criticizing other translators, even if that criticism is not put in the nicest way (and more often than not it won't be). But for any translator to fall back on the convenient excuse of "it's just bullying so I don't have to listen" is the absolute worst way to deal with situations like this. ALL translators should own up to their mistakes and try their best to improve, and that includes learning to take criticism gracefully and seriously, even if such criticism is aggressively made.		To make a general statement that has nothing to do with Mizuho or any other specific translator: unfortunately, there is no way of stopping people (readers, editors, and translators alike) from criticizing other translators, even if that criticism is not put in the nicest way (and more often than not it won't be). But for any translator to fall back on the convenient excuse of "it's just bullying so I don't have to listen," as you seem to be suggesting, is the absolute worst way to deal with situations like this. ALL translators should own up to their mistakes and try their best to improve, and that includes learning to take criticism gracefully and seriously, even if such criticism is aggressively made.

	--[[User:NanoDesu\|NanoDesu]] ([[User talk:NanoDesu\|talk]]) 20:20, 9 March 2013 (CST)		--[[User:NanoDesu\|NanoDesu]] ([[User talk:NanoDesu\|talk]]) 20:20, 9 March 2013 (CST)

NanoDesu at 02:20, 10 March 2013

2013-03-10T02:20:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:20, 10 March 2013
Line 28:		Line 28:

	--[[User:TRUTH\|TRUTH]] ([[User talk:TRUTH\|talk]]) 19:04, 9 March 2013 (CST)		--[[User:TRUTH\|TRUTH]] ([[User talk:TRUTH\|talk]]) 19:04, 9 March 2013 (CST)

			To make a general statement that has nothing to do with Mizuho or any other specific translator: unfortunately, there is no way of stopping people (readers, editors, and translators alike) from criticizing other translators, even if that criticism is not put in the nicest way (and more often than not it won't be). But for any translator to fall back on the convenient excuse of "it's just bullying so I don't have to listen" is the absolute worst way to deal with situations like this. ALL translators should own up to their mistakes and try their best to improve, and that includes learning to take criticism gracefully and seriously, even if such criticism is aggressively made.

			--[[User:NanoDesu\|NanoDesu]] ([[User talk:NanoDesu\|talk]]) 20:20, 9 March 2013 (CST)

TRUTH at 01:04, 10 March 2013

2013-03-10T01:04:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:04, 10 March 2013
Line 24:		Line 24:

	--[[User:NanoDesu\|NanoDesu]] ([[User talk:NanoDesu\|talk]]) 07:07, 9 March 2013 (CST)		--[[User:NanoDesu\|NanoDesu]] ([[User talk:NanoDesu\|talk]]) 07:07, 9 March 2013 (CST)

			Then why do I see lots of fingers being pointed to Mizuho? Cant you settle it in a proper way? I only see this is bullying. We really dont need any of that here.

			--[[User:TRUTH\|TRUTH]] ([[User talk:TRUTH\|talk]]) 19:04, 9 March 2013 (CST)

NanoDesu at 13:07, 9 March 2013

2013-03-09T13:07:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:07, 9 March 2013
Line 22:		Line 22:

	-ND		-ND

			--[[User:NanoDesu\|NanoDesu]] ([[User talk:NanoDesu\|talk]]) 07:07, 9 March 2013 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:29, 10 March 2013
Line 37:		Line 37:
	And the epilogue is NOT DONE by Mizuho. Just confirmed it. So chill out. It's summer and its hot--[[User:Chancs\|Chancs]] ([[User talk:Chancs\|talk]]) 22:44, 9 March 2013 (CST)		And the epilogue is NOT DONE by Mizuho. Just confirmed it. So chill out. It's summer and its hot--[[User:Chancs\|Chancs]] ([[User talk:Chancs\|talk]]) 22:44, 9 March 2013 (CST)

	Whoa, I wasn't aware that "try to make translations good" was my own radical personal philosophy. I apologize deeply. I also know how to do well in math now. "Yeah, the answer is wrong by YOUR philosophy, but it's right in mine! More points please." --[[User:NanoDesu\|NanoDesu]] ([[User talk:NanoDesu\|talk]]) 23:14, 9 March 2013 (CST)		Whoa, I wasn't aware that "try to make translations good" was my own radical personal philosophy. I apologize deeply. I also know how to do well in math now. "Yeah, the answer is wrong by YOUR philosophy, but it's right by mine! More points please." --[[User:NanoDesu\|NanoDesu]] ([[User talk:NanoDesu\|talk]]) 23:14, 9 March 2013 (CST)

			And yes, the sarcasm was necessary. I found the idea of this being "my philosophy" so ridiculous that I just couldn't dignify it with a more serious response. I do usually try to take opposing arguments seriously, but this one was just -_-. Come on people. Seriously. --[[User:NanoDesu\|NanoDesu]] ([[User talk:NanoDesu\|talk]]) 23:29, 9 March 2013 (CST)