Talk:Suzumiya Haruhi:Volume5 Snow Mountain Syndrome - Revision history

Jumpyshoes: Fixed.

2007-09-07T23:02:32Z

Fixed.

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:02, 7 September 2007
Line 62:		Line 62:
	''"If my guess, if correct, this equation would be the key for us to open the door."''		''"If my guess, if correct, this equation would be the key for us to open the door."''
	Should this not be "If my guess is correct"? --[[User:Partymetroid\|Partymetroid]] 15:03, 7 September 2007 (PDT)		Should this not be "If my guess is correct"? --[[User:Partymetroid\|Partymetroid]] 15:03, 7 September 2007 (PDT)

			Fixed.
			--[[User:Jumpyshoes\|Jumpyshoes]] 16:02, 7 September 2007 (PDT)

	==Shade?==		==Shade?==

Partymetroid: /* Translation issues */

2007-09-07T22:03:39Z

Translation issues

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:03, 7 September 2007
Line 58:		Line 58:
	Change to stomp. That should resolve the issue.		Change to stomp. That should resolve the issue.
	--[[User:Shiratoriryuuko\|shiratoriryuuko]] 12:26, 28 November 2006 (PST)		--[[User:Shiratoriryuuko\|shiratoriryuuko]] 12:26, 28 November 2006 (PST)

			===If my guess, if correct===
			''"If my guess, if correct, this equation would be the key for us to open the door."''
			Should this not be "If my guess is correct"? --[[User:Partymetroid\|Partymetroid]] 15:03, 7 September 2007 (PDT)

	==Shade?==		==Shade?==

Smidge204: /* Redundant number block description */

2007-01-21T15:51:02Z

Redundant number block description

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:51, 21 January 2007
Line 92:		Line 92:
	The final sentence in this quote is obviously redundant. Is the duplication in the original or is this construction debris?		The final sentence in this quote is obviously redundant. Is the duplication in the original or is this construction debris?
	Nutcase		Nutcase

			:I do not believe it is the task of the translators to second-guess the original writings. If that's how it is written in the original then I feel that's how it should stay. The ''style'' of writing is just as important as the story it tells. [[User:Smidge204\|Smidge204]] 07:51, 21 January 2007 (PST)

	== Portal, gate and door ==		== Portal, gate and door ==

Nutcase: Portal, gate and door

2007-01-21T14:04:17Z

Portal, gate and door

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:04, 21 January 2007
Line 91:		Line 91:

	The final sentence in this quote is obviously redundant. Is the duplication in the original or is this construction debris?		The final sentence in this quote is obviously redundant. Is the duplication in the original or is this construction debris?
			Nutcase

			== Portal, gate and door ==

			The only picture I can make of the "portal" into the mysterious mansion is as a double door, with the "door" being the active side with a handle and the "gate" being the usually static side, effectively part of the door frame under normal usage.

	Nutcase		Nutcase

Nutcase: Redundant number block description

2007-01-21T02:50:42Z

Redundant number block description

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:50, 21 January 2007
Line 82:		Line 82:
	::: On the bridge question, it is as the author has written.		::: On the bridge question, it is as the author has written.
	::: To comment no.4, thank you for pointing out the omission. It has been rectified. --[[User:Shiratoriryuuko\|shiratoriryuuko]] 12:34, 28 November 2006 (PST)		::: To comment no.4, thank you for pointing out the omission. It has been rectified. --[[User:Shiratoriryuuko\|shiratoriryuuko]] 12:34, 28 November 2006 (PST)

			== Redundant number block description ==

			"Koizumi points to a group of numbered blocks placed inside a wooden frame on the floor. Looking at it closely I see that three rows of digits from 0 to 9 are stored there. I bend down to take one out and have a look at it. The appearance is like a Mahjong tile as is the weight. The only difference is that the pattern carved onto it is that single digit Arabic numeral.

			Ten kinds of digits are divided into three groups, and placed in a flat wooden box."


			The final sentence in this quote is obviously redundant. Is the duplication in the original or is this construction debris?
			Nutcase

83.221.224.178: /* Hamlet and door? */

2006-12-01T18:48:39Z

Hamlet and door?

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:48, 1 December 2006
Line 6:		Line 6:

	=== Hamlet and door? ===		=== Hamlet and door? ===
	Several lines in Hamlet said by the tragic protagonist himself ~~does~~ somehow echo back to the plight of the SOS Brigade.		Several lines in Hamlet said by the tragic protagonist himself do somehow echo back to the plight of the SOS Brigade.

	==== Act III. Scene I. 124 ====		==== Act III. Scene I. 124 ====
Line 17:		Line 17:
	''O villainy! Ho, let the door be locked!''		''O villainy! Ho, let the door be locked!''
	''Treachery! Seek it out.''		''Treachery! Seek it out.''


	=== State of ''Mary Celeste'' when found ===		=== State of ''Mary Celeste'' when found ===

Shiratoriryuuko: /* Discrete Mathematics */

2006-11-28T20:52:56Z

Discrete Mathematics

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:52, 28 November 2006
Line 82:		Line 82:
	::: To the description on 2, notice that the shapes in question within the chapter are all convex polyhedra. Non-convex polyhedra are not discussed within the scope of this chapter.		::: To the description on 2, notice that the shapes in question within the chapter are all convex polyhedra. Non-convex polyhedra are not discussed within the scope of this chapter.
	::: On the bridge question, it is as the author has written.		::: On the bridge question, it is as the author has written.
	::: To comment no.4, thank you for pointing out the omission. It has been rectified.		::: To comment no.4, thank you for pointing out the omission. It has been rectified. --[[User:Shiratoriryuuko\|shiratoriryuuko]] 12:34, 28 November 2006 (PST)
	--[[User:Shiratoriryuuko\|shiratoriryuuko]] 12:34, 28 November 2006 (PST)

Shiratoriryuuko: /* Discrete Mathematics */

2006-11-28T20:52:38Z

Discrete Mathematics

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:52, 28 November 2006
Line 79:		Line 79:
	::Koizumi only considers the cases D=2 or D=3 in x - y + z = D - 1. In these cases the formula is correct since he doesn't count the outer region in the planar case, but it is not correct for higher dimensions D. I think that an end note is sufficient for this point. -- [[User:89.58.149.4\|89.58.149.4]] 13:00, 27 November 2006 (PST)		::Koizumi only considers the cases D=2 or D=3 in x - y + z = D - 1. In these cases the formula is correct since he doesn't count the outer region in the planar case, but it is not correct for higher dimensions D. I think that an end note is sufficient for this point. -- [[User:89.58.149.4\|89.58.149.4]] 13:00, 27 November 2006 (PST)

	:: To the generalization for other dimensions, please note that the equation only stands for the bound of D = 2 or D = 3.		::: To the generalization for other dimensions, please note that the equation only stands for the bound of D = 2 or D = 3, as said above by 89.58.149.4
	:: To the description on 2, notice that the shapes in question within the chapter are all convex polyhedra. Non-convex polyhedra are not discussed within the scope of this chapter.		::: To the description on 2, notice that the shapes in question within the chapter are all convex polyhedra. Non-convex polyhedra are not discussed within the scope of this chapter.
	:: On the bridge question, it is as the author has written.		::: On the bridge question, it is as the author has written.
	:: To comment no.4, thank you for pointing out the omission. It has been rectified. --[[User:Shiratoriryuuko\|shiratoriryuuko]] 12:34, 28 November 2006 (PST)		::: To comment no.4, thank you for pointing out the omission. It has been rectified.
			--[[User:Shiratoriryuuko\|shiratoriryuuko]] 12:34, 28 November 2006 (PST)

Shiratoriryuuko: /* Discrete Mathematics */

2006-11-28T20:50:02Z

Discrete Mathematics

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:50, 28 November 2006
Line 79:		Line 79:
	::Koizumi only considers the cases D=2 or D=3 in x - y + z = D - 1. In these cases the formula is correct since he doesn't count the outer region in the planar case, but it is not correct for higher dimensions D. I think that an end note is sufficient for this point. -- [[User:89.58.149.4\|89.58.149.4]] 13:00, 27 November 2006 (PST)		::Koizumi only considers the cases D=2 or D=3 in x - y + z = D - 1. In these cases the formula is correct since he doesn't count the outer region in the planar case, but it is not correct for higher dimensions D. I think that an end note is sufficient for this point. -- [[User:89.58.149.4\|89.58.149.4]] 13:00, 27 November 2006 (PST)

	:: ~~(Go send a letter to~~ the ~~author?)~~		:: To the generalization for other dimensions, please note that the equation only stands for the bound of D = 2 or D = 3.
	:: To the description on 2, notice that the shapes in question within the chapter are all convex polyhedra. Non-convex polyhedra are not discussed within the scope of this chapter.		:: To the description on 2, notice that the shapes in question within the chapter are all convex polyhedra. Non-convex polyhedra are not discussed within the scope of this chapter.
	:: On the bridge question, it is as the author has written.		:: On the bridge question, it is as the author has written.
	:: To comment no.4, thank you for pointing out the omission. It has been rectified. --[[User:Shiratoriryuuko\|shiratoriryuuko]] 12:34, 28 November 2006 (PST)		:: To comment no.4, thank you for pointing out the omission. It has been rectified. --[[User:Shiratoriryuuko\|shiratoriryuuko]] 12:34, 28 November 2006 (PST)

Shiratoriryuuko: /* Discrete Mathematics */

2006-11-28T20:48:48Z

Discrete Mathematics

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:48, 28 November 2006
Line 80:		Line 80:

	:: (Go send a letter to the author?)		:: (Go send a letter to the author?)
	:: To the description on 2, notice that the shapes in question ~~here~~ are all convex polyhedra. Non-~~conxed~~ polyhedra are discussed within the scope of this chapter.		:: To the description on 2, notice that the shapes in question within the chapter are all convex polyhedra. Non-convex polyhedra are not discussed within the scope of this chapter.
	:: On the bridge question, it is as the author has written.		:: On the bridge question, it is as the author has written.
	:: To comment no.4, thank you for pointing out the omission. It has been rectified. --[[User:Shiratoriryuuko\|shiratoriryuuko]] 12:34, 28 November 2006 (PST)		:: To comment no.4, thank you for pointing out the omission. It has been rectified. --[[User:Shiratoriryuuko\|shiratoriryuuko]] 12:34, 28 November 2006 (PST)