Talk:Tate no Yuusha no Nariagari:Web Chapter 4 - Revision history

SonodaYuki: SonodaYuki moved page Talk:Tate no Yuusha:Web Chapter 4 to Talk:Tate no Yuusha no Nariagari:Web Chapter 4

2014-11-15T06:39:38Z

SonodaYuki moved page Talk:Tate no Yuusha:Web Chapter 4 to Talk:Tate no Yuusha no Nariagari:Web Chapter 4

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:39, 15 November 2014
(No difference)

Cruxador at 10:33, 18 September 2014

2014-09-18T10:33:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:33, 18 September 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Suggested revision for the line "There was also those dressed in knight-like garb."		Suggested revision for the line "There was also those dressed in knight-like garb."
	I already swapped "garbs" for "garb" since that's purely a grammatical error. But using it at all is a bit odd - you would normally think of nights as wearing armor, rather than something made of cloth, so "garb" would be inappropriate. At least, unless it's referring to tabards, in which case you should just say that.		I already swapped "garbs" for "garb" since that's purely a grammatical error. But using it at all is a bit odd - you would normally think of nights as wearing armor, rather than something made of cloth, so "garb" would be inappropriate. At least, unless it's referring to tabards (which they don't have in the manga), in which case you should just say that.
	While I'm at it, "There was also those" is shit grammar, but that's not different from the sort that pervades most of these translations and doesn't confuse meaning.		While I'm at it, "There was also those" is shit grammar, but that's not different from the sort that pervades most of these translations and doesn't confuse meaning.

	~~I could fix this myself but I'm not really a regular here and I don't know the procedures for editing other people's work.~~

Cruxador: Created page with "Suggested revision for the line "There was also those dressed in knight-like garb." I already swapped "garbs" for "garb" since that's purely a grammatical error. But using it ..."

2014-09-18T10:09:41Z

Created page with "Suggested revision for the line "There was also those dressed in knight-like garb." I already swapped "garbs" for "garb" since that's purely a grammatical error. But using it ..."

New page

Suggested revision for the line "There was also those dressed in knight-like garb."
I already swapped "garbs" for "garb" since that's purely a grammatical error. But using it at all is a bit odd - you would normally think of nights as wearing armor, rather than something made of cloth, so "garb" would be inappropriate. At least, unless it's referring to tabards, in which case you should just say that.
While I'm at it, "There was also those" is shit grammar, but that's not different from the sort that pervades most of these translations and doesn't confuse meaning.

I could fix this myself but I'm not really a regular here and I don't know the procedures for editing other people's work.