User talk:Bnns - Revision history

Bnns: /* Infinite Stratos: Editing Updates */

2012-08-15T06:20:54Z

Infinite Stratos: Editing Updates

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:20, 15 August 2012
Line 78:		Line 78:
	====Infinite Stratos: Editing Updates====		====Infinite Stratos: Editing Updates====
	'''Volume 1: Chapter 1 (Complete)''' [[User:Bnns\|bnns]] - [[User_talk:Bnns\|Talk]] 01:57, 24 July 2012 (CDT)		'''Volume 1: Chapter 1 (Complete)''' [[User:Bnns\|bnns]] - [[User_talk:Bnns\|Talk]] 01:57, 24 July 2012 (CDT)

	'''Volume 1: Chapter 2'''		'''Volume 1: Chapter 2'''
	'''Volume 2: Chapter 1'''
	line 140 - [[User:Bnns\|bnns]] - [[User_talk:Bnns\|Talk]] 01:19, 15 August 2012 (CDT)		'''Volume 2: Chapter 1''' (Oops i think i skipped.)
			:line 140 - [[User:Bnns\|bnns]] - [[User_talk:Bnns\|Talk]] 01:19, 15 August 2012 (CDT)

Bnns: /* Infinte Stratos */

2012-08-15T06:19:06Z

Infinte Stratos

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:19, 15 August 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	===~~Infinte~~ Stratos===		===Infinite Stratos===

	Have done some work editing the first chapter of IS even though it hasn't been active for quite a while when i was reading the structure of a lot of the different sentences just didn't sit well with me. Either because the content was made too vague by redundancy of words or it was unclear either what was going on or who was the subject so i started making changes to make it clearer to the casual reader. If you have any questions or issues with edits please feel free to contact me.		Have done some work editing the first chapter of IS even though it hasn't been active for quite a while when i was reading the structure of a lot of the different sentences just didn't sit well with me. Either because the content was made too vague by redundancy of words or it was unclear either what was going on or who was the subject so i started making changes to make it clearer to the casual reader. If you have any questions or issues with edits please feel free to contact me.
Line 77:		Line 77:

	====Infinite Stratos: Editing Updates====		====Infinite Stratos: Editing Updates====
	'''Chapter 1 (Complete)''' [[User:Bnns\|bnns]] - [[User_talk:Bnns\|Talk]] 01:57, 24 July 2012 (CDT)		'''Volume 1: Chapter 1 (Complete)''' [[User:Bnns\|bnns]] - [[User_talk:Bnns\|Talk]] 01:57, 24 July 2012 (CDT)
			'''Volume 1: Chapter 2'''
			'''Volume 2: Chapter 1'''
			line 140 - [[User:Bnns\|bnns]] - [[User_talk:Bnns\|Talk]] 01:19, 15 August 2012 (CDT)

Bnns: Updates

2012-07-24T06:57:08Z

Updates

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-===Updates===
+===Infinte Stratos===
 Have done some work editing the first chapter of IS even though it hasn't been active for quite a while when i was reading the structure of a lot of the different sentences just didn't sit well with me. Either because the content was made too vague by redundancy of words or it was unclear either what was going on or who was the subject so i started making changes to make it clearer to the casual reader. If you have any questions or issues with edits please feel free to contact me.
@@ Line 91: / Line 75: @@
 Haha, there isn't really a need for a scheldule if you are editting. You should just do it as you like in your free time. I'll be glad to help anytime when you resume editting. Regarding making the edits clearer, I'll leave it up to you. [[User:Zakashi|Zakashi]] 07:02, 13 July 2012 (CDT)

Bnns: updates

2012-07-20T03:36:25Z

updates

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:36, 20 July 2012
Line 12:		Line 12:
	up to line 928 [[User:Bnns\|bnns]] - [[User_talk:Bnns\|Talk]] 02:23, 10 July 2012 (CDT)		up to line 928 [[User:Bnns\|bnns]] - [[User_talk:Bnns\|Talk]] 02:23, 10 July 2012 (CDT)

	up to line 1184 [[User:Bnns\|bnns]] - [[User_talk:Bnns\|Talk]] 14:39, 10 July 2012 (CDT) (Still needs to be proofread.)		up to line 1184 [[User:Bnns\|bnns]] - [[User_talk:Bnns\|Talk]] 14:39, 10 July 2012 (CDT)

			up to line 1245 [[User:Bnns\|bnns]] - [[User_talk:Bnns\|Talk]] 22:36, 19 July 2012 (CDT) (Still needs to be proofread.)

	===Infinte Stratos===		===Infinte Stratos===

Zakashi at 12:02, 13 July 2012

2012-07-13T12:02:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:02, 13 July 2012
Line 87:		Line 87:

	Also i won't be able to make edits until the end of the weekend, just wanted to let you know because you've been a big help so far and didn't want you to think i'm MIA. Just very busy and stuff for the next couple days but i'm really looking forward to finishing this chapter so i can get started on the next one. :) [[User:Bnns\|bnns]] - [[User_talk:Bnns\|Talk]] 01:41, 13 July 2012 (CDT)		Also i won't be able to make edits until the end of the weekend, just wanted to let you know because you've been a big help so far and didn't want you to think i'm MIA. Just very busy and stuff for the next couple days but i'm really looking forward to finishing this chapter so i can get started on the next one. :) [[User:Bnns\|bnns]] - [[User_talk:Bnns\|Talk]] 01:41, 13 July 2012 (CDT)

			Haha, there isn't really a need for a scheldule if you are editting. You should just do it as you like in your free time. I'll be glad to help anytime when you resume editting. Regarding making the edits clearer, I'll leave it up to you. [[User:Zakashi\|Zakashi]] 07:02, 13 July 2012 (CDT)

Bnns at 06:41, 13 July 2012

2012-07-13T06:41:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:41, 13 July 2012
Line 85:		Line 85:

	In regards to the edits i've tried to make it clearer by adding current edits to the part of the line as well as refer to the word that was changed if there is confusion as to what should be put. It makes it harder to read and for that i apologize, but as far as i can tell it might make easier to understand why it was change to what it is. If you think there is a better way to doing it please feel free to suggest it. It's just that i've noticed somethings occasionally getting changed improperly and with documentation as to why it is the way it is it tends to lead to less confusion and better judgments on changes. [[User:Bnns\|bnns]] - [[User_talk:Bnns\|Talk]] 01:37, 13 July 2012 (CDT)		In regards to the edits i've tried to make it clearer by adding current edits to the part of the line as well as refer to the word that was changed if there is confusion as to what should be put. It makes it harder to read and for that i apologize, but as far as i can tell it might make easier to understand why it was change to what it is. If you think there is a better way to doing it please feel free to suggest it. It's just that i've noticed somethings occasionally getting changed improperly and with documentation as to why it is the way it is it tends to lead to less confusion and better judgments on changes. [[User:Bnns\|bnns]] - [[User_talk:Bnns\|Talk]] 01:37, 13 July 2012 (CDT)

			Also i won't be able to make edits until the end of the weekend, just wanted to let you know because you've been a big help so far and didn't want you to think i'm MIA. Just very busy and stuff for the next couple days but i'm really looking forward to finishing this chapter so i can get started on the next one. :) [[User:Bnns\|bnns]] - [[User_talk:Bnns\|Talk]] 01:41, 13 July 2012 (CDT)

Bnns at 06:37, 13 July 2012

2012-07-13T06:37:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:37, 13 July 2012
Line 83:		Line 83:

	In that regard from my understanding the proper way to word it is "... a school that '''was an''' average standard in ..." though to be honest i don't think it's in the common vernacular anymore, so it may seem a little odd. If you think that 'was of' fits better then you can feel free to change it to that as far as i'm concerned they both work, the current way of saying it is proper but uncommon. [[User:Bnns\|bnns]] - [[User_talk:Bnns\|Talk]] 01:29, 13 July 2012 (CDT)		In that regard from my understanding the proper way to word it is "... a school that '''was an''' average standard in ..." though to be honest i don't think it's in the common vernacular anymore, so it may seem a little odd. If you think that 'was of' fits better then you can feel free to change it to that as far as i'm concerned they both work, the current way of saying it is proper but uncommon. [[User:Bnns\|bnns]] - [[User_talk:Bnns\|Talk]] 01:29, 13 July 2012 (CDT)

			In regards to the edits i've tried to make it clearer by adding current edits to the part of the line as well as refer to the word that was changed if there is confusion as to what should be put. It makes it harder to read and for that i apologize, but as far as i can tell it might make easier to understand why it was change to what it is. If you think there is a better way to doing it please feel free to suggest it. It's just that i've noticed somethings occasionally getting changed improperly and with documentation as to why it is the way it is it tends to lead to less confusion and better judgments on changes. [[User:Bnns\|bnns]] - [[User_talk:Bnns\|Talk]] 01:37, 13 July 2012 (CDT)

Bnns: /* Infinte Stratos */

2012-07-13T06:29:55Z

Infinte Stratos

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:29, 13 July 2012
Line 81:		Line 81:

	By the way, regarding the edit about "average standard in education", maybe we can put "was of average standard ..." ? Well, I'm not sure if I was the one who changed it to "had" in the first place, I just realised it didn't really fit.		By the way, regarding the edit about "average standard in education", maybe we can put "was of average standard ..." ? Well, I'm not sure if I was the one who changed it to "had" in the first place, I just realised it didn't really fit.

			In that regard from my understanding the proper way to word it is "... a school that '''was an''' average standard in ..." though to be honest i don't think it's in the common vernacular anymore, so it may seem a little odd. If you think that 'was of' fits better then you can feel free to change it to that as far as i'm concerned they both work, the current way of saying it is proper but uncommon. [[User:Bnns\|bnns]] - [[User_talk:Bnns\|Talk]] 01:29, 13 July 2012 (CDT)

Zakashi at 10:38, 12 July 2012

2012-07-12T10:38:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:38, 12 July 2012
Line 79:		Line 79:

	Well, since you are the one making the edits, I have no problems with you deciding what to do with them :). I'll leave it up to you to decide which to remove when you run a final check. If you think that the particular edit would be generally accepted by all, then maybe we can remove it. I understand that the reasons for the edits are needed but if people do not check previous versions then they may miss out what is changed so maybe you can try to make it clearer in that sense. Well, everything is up to you since you are taking the time to make the edits. Thanks :) [[User:Zakashi\|Zakashi]] 05:08, 12 July 2012 (CDT)		Well, since you are the one making the edits, I have no problems with you deciding what to do with them :). I'll leave it up to you to decide which to remove when you run a final check. If you think that the particular edit would be generally accepted by all, then maybe we can remove it. I understand that the reasons for the edits are needed but if people do not check previous versions then they may miss out what is changed so maybe you can try to make it clearer in that sense. Well, everything is up to you since you are taking the time to make the edits. Thanks :) [[User:Zakashi\|Zakashi]] 05:08, 12 July 2012 (CDT)

			By the way, regarding the edit about "average standard in education", maybe we can put "was of average standard ..." ? Well, I'm not sure if I was the one who changed it to "had" in the first place, I just realised it didn't really fit.

Zakashi at 10:08, 12 July 2012

2012-07-12T10:08:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:08, 12 July 2012
Line 77:		Line 77:

	Just one more thing though it might be better if we leave them in because it'll make editing the docs either harder or new individuals who edit it may miss out on the reasons completely if they neglect to look at the reference doc, as it's particularly hard to figure out the line numbers when the chapter is being edited. [[User:Bnns\|bnns]] - [[User_talk:Bnns\|Talk]] 19:58, 11 July 2012 (CDT)		Just one more thing though it might be better if we leave them in because it'll make editing the docs either harder or new individuals who edit it may miss out on the reasons completely if they neglect to look at the reference doc, as it's particularly hard to figure out the line numbers when the chapter is being edited. [[User:Bnns\|bnns]] - [[User_talk:Bnns\|Talk]] 19:58, 11 July 2012 (CDT)

			Well, since you are the one making the edits, I have no problems with you deciding what to do with them :). I'll leave it up to you to decide which to remove when you run a final check. If you think that the particular edit would be generally accepted by all, then maybe we can remove it. I understand that the reasons for the edits are needed but if people do not check previous versions then they may miss out what is changed so maybe you can try to make it clearer in that sense. Well, everything is up to you since you are taking the time to make the edits. Thanks :) [[User:Zakashi\|Zakashi]] 05:08, 12 July 2012 (CDT)