User talk:Hiiragi Kagami - Revision history

RasqualTwilight: SR editproofing

2008-02-19T18:49:14Z

SR editproofing

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:49, 19 February 2008
Line 4:		Line 4:
	*I think that while translating you get the past-tense effect which screws up the timing since the original lines weren't present tense in the first place. That is also why you get some screwy English, despite having enough accuracy to get the idea. Even if you do a pure present tense conversion, it's still screwed up. The largest oddity is the segments that display current or just happenings that have slight ambiguity since they are both current and just happening, making either present or past tense plausible. [[User:Amoirsp\|Amoirsp]]		*I think that while translating you get the past-tense effect which screws up the timing since the original lines weren't present tense in the first place. That is also why you get some screwy English, despite having enough accuracy to get the idea. Even if you do a pure present tense conversion, it's still screwed up. The largest oddity is the segments that display current or just happenings that have slight ambiguity since they are both current and just happening, making either present or past tense plausible. [[User:Amoirsp\|Amoirsp]]
	*Likely due to the fact that it's current. I wonder how many of those English books are in first person. I gather it is not a high percentage. Shrug, past tensing a current happening. -Amoirsp		*Likely due to the fact that it's current. I wonder how many of those English books are in first person. I gather it is not a high percentage. Shrug, past tensing a current happening. -Amoirsp

			== SR editproofing ==

			Hello,

			If you are the one willing to [http://tsukuru.info/tlwiki/index.php?title=Talk:Symphonic_Rain#Editor.2FProofreader_Available edit and/or proofread] scripts for the Symphonic Rain translation project on TLWiki, I'm afraid there won't be much to do at this point. We're in lack for TLers and TL checkers, with Phar being the most active contributor. If you want to participate, feel free to do so, but leave comments as to why you feel a change is needed, using the appropriate template (such as "''changed from xxx to yyy because [[User:Velocity7\|Velocity7]] is naughty''"). There are examples in the first script on how to do that.

			[[User:RasqualTwilight\|Seven Eleven]] 10:49, 19 February 2008 (PST)

Amoirsp: /* Tenses is hard */

2007-11-26T06:46:06Z

Tenses is hard

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:46, 26 November 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	The original Japanese has everything past-tense though... :S --[[User:Velocity7\|velocity7]]		The original Japanese has everything past-tense though... :S --[[User:Velocity7\|velocity7]]
	*I think that while translating you get the past-tense effect which screws up the timing since the original lines weren't present tense in the first place. That is also why you get some screwy English, despite having enough accuracy to get the idea. Even if you do a pure present tense conversion, it's still screwed up. The largest oddity is the segments that display current or just happenings that have slight ambiguity since they are both current and just happening, making either present or past tense plausible. [[User:Amoirsp\|Amoirsp]]		*I think that while translating you get the past-tense effect which screws up the timing since the original lines weren't present tense in the first place. That is also why you get some screwy English, despite having enough accuracy to get the idea. Even if you do a pure present tense conversion, it's still screwed up. The largest oddity is the segments that display current or just happenings that have slight ambiguity since they are both current and just happening, making either present or past tense plausible. [[User:Amoirsp\|Amoirsp]]
			*Likely due to the fact that it's current. I wonder how many of those English books are in first person. I gather it is not a high percentage. Shrug, past tensing a current happening. -Amoirsp

Amoirsp: /* Tenses is hard */

2007-11-26T04:19:36Z

Tenses is hard

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:19, 26 November 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:

	The original Japanese has everything past-tense though... :S --[[User:Velocity7\|velocity7]]		The original Japanese has everything past-tense though... :S --[[User:Velocity7\|velocity7]]
			*I think that while translating you get the past-tense effect which screws up the timing since the original lines weren't present tense in the first place. That is also why you get some screwy English, despite having enough accuracy to get the idea. Even if you do a pure present tense conversion, it's still screwed up. The largest oddity is the segments that display current or just happenings that have slight ambiguity since they are both current and just happening, making either present or past tense plausible. [[User:Amoirsp\|Amoirsp]]

Velocity7: Tenses is hard

2007-11-25T03:10:59Z

Tenses is hard

New page

== Tenses is hard ==

The original Japanese has everything past-tense though... :S --[[User:Velocity7|velocity7]]