User talk:Sage - Revision history

Sage at 10:16, 1 June 2006

2006-06-01T10:16:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:16, 1 June 2006
Line 47:		Line 47:

	Now you're hurting the Sneaker Magazine editors' feelings ( ;ω;) hehe just kidding ( ﾟωﾟ)		Now you're hurting the Sneaker Magazine editors' feelings ( ;ω;) hehe just kidding ( ﾟωﾟ)

			<HR>

			OMG! You work for a sneaker magazine!? You must really like shoes! :) ~Sage

GDsMDDLFNGR at 08:01, 1 June 2006

2006-06-01T08:01:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:01, 1 June 2006
Line 43:		Line 43:

	In the anime, at least, they make a clear vocal distinction between him talking and him thinking. As I said earlier I found it hard to tell who was talking and about what at times when he had a lot of inner monologue going on. When I highlighted then passages everything clearly fell in to place. Mind you this is just how I think. I won't change any more of his internal monologue so don't worry. Though, I can't imagine that if the book came out in the US, after landing on the desk of a professional editor, that his internal monologue would remain unhighlighted in any way. ~Sage		In the anime, at least, they make a clear vocal distinction between him talking and him thinking. As I said earlier I found it hard to tell who was talking and about what at times when he had a lot of inner monologue going on. When I highlighted then passages everything clearly fell in to place. Mind you this is just how I think. I won't change any more of his internal monologue so don't worry. Though, I can't imagine that if the book came out in the US, after landing on the desk of a professional editor, that his internal monologue would remain unhighlighted in any way. ~Sage

			<HR>

			Now you're hurting the Sneaker Magazine editors' feelings ( ;ω;) hehe just kidding ( ﾟωﾟ)

Sage at 07:45, 1 June 2006

2006-06-01T07:45:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:45, 1 June 2006
Line 21:		Line 21:
	No problem. I'm no book editor. ;) I was reading the first chapter and thought a few things seemed out of place and could use a bit of touch-up. And of course with Wiki, if you don't want your work to be edited, don't edit.		No problem. I'm no book editor. ;) I was reading the first chapter and thought a few things seemed out of place and could use a bit of touch-up. And of course with Wiki, if you don't want your work to be edited, don't edit.

	Thanks for your post though it's always kind of someone to say why they did things and not flame you for trying to help.		Thanks for your post though it's always kind of someone to say why they did things and not flame you for trying to help. ~Sage

Sage at 07:44, 1 June 2006

2006-06-01T07:44:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:44, 1 June 2006
Line 16:		Line 16:

	--[[User:BlckKnght\|BlckKnght]] 13:23, 30 May 2006 (PDT)		--[[User:BlckKnght\|BlckKnght]] 13:23, 30 May 2006 (PDT)

			<HR>

	No problem. I'm no book editor. ;) I was reading the first chapter and thought a few things seemed out of place and could use a bit of touch-up. And of course with Wiki, if you don't want your work to be edited, don't edit.		No problem. I'm no book editor. ;) I was reading the first chapter and thought a few things seemed out of place and could use a bit of touch-up. And of course with Wiki, if you don't want your work to be edited, don't edit.

Sage: /* Re: Took out the ( and ) as to the guidelines. But used italics to represent some of K's dialog. It needs to stand out somehow... */

2006-06-01T07:44:00Z

Re: Took out the ( and ) as to the guidelines. But used italics to represent some of K's dialog. It needs to stand out somehow...

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:44, 1 June 2006
Line 24:		Line 24:

	== Re: Took out the ( and ) as to the guidelines. But used italics to represent some of K's dialog. It needs to stand out somehow... ==		== Re: Took out the ( and ) as to the guidelines. But used italics to represent some of K's dialog. It needs to stand out somehow... ==

	~~<HR>~~

	In my opinion, they don't need to stand out, since they didn't stand out in the original. You can tell in the context whether he says them out loud or not... especially when others respond. But that's just my opinion...		In my opinion, they don't need to stand out, since they didn't stand out in the original. You can tell in the context whether he says them out loud or not... especially when others respond. But that's just my opinion...

Sage: /* Re: Took out the ( and ) as to the guidelines. But used italics to represent some of K's dialog. It needs to stand out somehow... */

2006-06-01T07:43:38Z

Re: Took out the ( and ) as to the guidelines. But used italics to represent some of K's dialog. It needs to stand out somehow...

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:43, 1 June 2006
Line 24:		Line 24:

	== Re: Took out the ( and ) as to the guidelines. But used italics to represent some of K's dialog. It needs to stand out somehow... ==		== Re: Took out the ( and ) as to the guidelines. But used italics to represent some of K's dialog. It needs to stand out somehow... ==

			<HR>

	In my opinion, they don't need to stand out, since they didn't stand out in the original. You can tell in the context whether he says them out loud or not... especially when others respond. But that's just my opinion...		In my opinion, they don't need to stand out, since they didn't stand out in the original. You can tell in the context whether he says them out loud or not... especially when others respond. But that's just my opinion...
Line 33:		Line 35:
	Even if they didn't stand out in the Japanese there is no reason they shouldn't stand out in the English version. of course that's just my ¥2. ^_^ ~Sage		Even if they didn't stand out in the Japanese there is no reason they shouldn't stand out in the English version. of course that's just my ¥2. ^_^ ~Sage

			<HR>

	I think the fact that they are not distinguished in the Japanese (original) version is the biggest reason the same should be done for the English (translated) one. Think of it as respecting the author's style. Anyway, there's a little discussion about this [http://www.baka-tsuki.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=28 here]. ( ﾟωﾟ)		I think the fact that they are not distinguished in the Japanese (original) version is the biggest reason the same should be done for the English (translated) one. Think of it as respecting the author's style. Anyway, there's a little discussion about this [http://www.baka-tsuki.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=28 here]. ( ﾟωﾟ)

Sage: /* Re: Took out the ( and ) as to the guidelines. But used italics to represent some of K's dialog. It needs to stand out somehow... */

2006-06-01T07:42:48Z

Re: Took out the ( and ) as to the guidelines. But used italics to represent some of K's dialog. It needs to stand out somehow...

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:42, 1 June 2006
Line 35:		Line 35:

	I think the fact that they are not distinguished in the Japanese (original) version is the biggest reason the same should be done for the English (translated) one. Think of it as respecting the author's style. Anyway, there's a little discussion about this [http://www.baka-tsuki.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=28 here]. ( ﾟωﾟ)		I think the fact that they are not distinguished in the Japanese (original) version is the biggest reason the same should be done for the English (translated) one. Think of it as respecting the author's style. Anyway, there's a little discussion about this [http://www.baka-tsuki.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=28 here]. ( ﾟωﾟ)

			<HR>

	In the anime, at least, they make a clear vocal distinction between him talking and him thinking. As I said earlier I found it hard to tell who was talking and about what at times when he had a lot of inner monologue going on. When I highlighted then passages everything clearly fell in to place. Mind you this is just how I think. I won't change any more of his internal monologue so don't worry. Though, I can't imagine that if the book came out in the US, after landing on the desk of a professional editor, that his internal monologue would remain unhighlighted in any way. ~Sage		In the anime, at least, they make a clear vocal distinction between him talking and him thinking. As I said earlier I found it hard to tell who was talking and about what at times when he had a lot of inner monologue going on. When I highlighted then passages everything clearly fell in to place. Mind you this is just how I think. I won't change any more of his internal monologue so don't worry. Though, I can't imagine that if the book came out in the US, after landing on the desk of a professional editor, that his internal monologue would remain unhighlighted in any way. ~Sage

Sage: /* Re: Took out the ( and ) as to the guidelines. But used italics to represent some of K's dialog. It needs to stand out somehow... */

2006-06-01T07:42:18Z

Re: Took out the ( and ) as to the guidelines. But used italics to represent some of K's dialog. It needs to stand out somehow...

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:42, 1 June 2006
Line 31:		Line 31:
	There are a few times where I was reading and the context of what he was saying didn't make sense till I realized that instead he was thinking the words internally.		There are a few times where I was reading and the context of what he was saying didn't make sense till I realized that instead he was thinking the words internally.

	Even if they didn't stand out in the Japanese there is no reason they shouldn't stand out in the English version. of course that's just my ¥2. ^_^		Even if they didn't stand out in the Japanese there is no reason they shouldn't stand out in the English version. of course that's just my ¥2. ^_^ ~Sage


	I think the fact that they are not distinguished in the Japanese (original) version is the biggest reason the same should be done for the English (translated) one. Think of it as respecting the author's style. Anyway, there's a ~~litle~~ discussion about this [http://www.baka-tsuki.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=28 here]. ( ﾟωﾟ)		I think the fact that they are not distinguished in the Japanese (original) version is the biggest reason the same should be done for the English (translated) one. Think of it as respecting the author's style. Anyway, there's a little discussion about this [http://www.baka-tsuki.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=28 here]. ( ﾟωﾟ)

			In the anime, at least, they make a clear vocal distinction between him talking and him thinking. As I said earlier I found it hard to tell who was talking and about what at times when he had a lot of inner monologue going on. When I highlighted then passages everything clearly fell in to place. Mind you this is just how I think. I won't change any more of his internal monologue so don't worry. Though, I can't imagine that if the book came out in the US, after landing on the desk of a professional editor, that his internal monologue would remain unhighlighted in any way. ~Sage

GDsMDDLFNGR at 07:36, 1 June 2006

2006-06-01T07:36:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:36, 1 June 2006
Line 32:		Line 32:

	Even if they didn't stand out in the Japanese there is no reason they shouldn't stand out in the English version. of course that's just my ¥2. ^_^		Even if they didn't stand out in the Japanese there is no reason they shouldn't stand out in the English version. of course that's just my ¥2. ^_^


			I think the fact that they are not distinguished in the Japanese (original) version is the biggest reason the same should be done for the English (translated) one. Think of it as respecting the author's style. Anyway, there's a litle discussion about this [http://www.baka-tsuki.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=28 here]. ( ﾟωﾟ)

Sage at 06:42, 1 June 2006

2006-06-01T06:42:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:42, 1 June 2006
Line 28:		Line 28:

	--[[User:GDsMDDLFNGR\|GDsMDDLFNGR]] 11:25, 31 May 2006 (PDT)		--[[User:GDsMDDLFNGR\|GDsMDDLFNGR]] 11:25, 31 May 2006 (PDT)

			There are a few times where I was reading and the context of what he was saying didn't make sense till I realized that instead he was thinking the words internally.

			Even if they didn't stand out in the Japanese there is no reason they shouldn't stand out in the English version. of course that's just my ¥2. ^_^