User talk:Thinklife - Revision history

Atemlos: /* So, */ new section

2014-02-02T23:57:10Z

So,: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:57, 2 February 2014
Line 15:		Line 15:

	Thanks.		Thanks.

			== So, ==

			I noticed you did some of the volumes of Sword Art Online, but haven't uploaded them. May I know why?

Thinklife: /* SAO Volume 2 chapter 4 */

2011-04-12T23:41:28Z

SAO Volume 2 chapter 4

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:41, 12 April 2011
Line 9:		Line 9:
	Hi, I am part of BCFM. I did part of this chapter for self study and have stopped to help with the main story. If you want I can send you the few pages I got done. --[[User:Xplorer30\|Xplorer30]] 20:38, 11 April 2011 (UCT)		Hi, I am part of BCFM. I did part of this chapter for self study and have stopped to help with the main story. If you want I can send you the few pages I got done. --[[User:Xplorer30\|Xplorer30]] 20:38, 11 April 2011 (UCT)

	Sure. You can just upload what you have onto BT~~, or if you prefer, you can email it to me at bill [at] billzhou [dot] net~~.		Sure. You can just upload what you have onto BT.


	I put it in BT as a comment. You can do whatever you want with it. --[[User:Xplorer30\|Xplorer30]] 22:11, 12 April 2011 (UCT)		I put it in BT as a comment. You can do whatever you want with it. --[[User:Xplorer30\|Xplorer30]] 22:11, 12 April 2011 (UCT)

			Thanks.

Xplorer30 at 22:11, 12 April 2011

2011-04-12T22:11:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:11, 12 April 2011
Line 10:		Line 10:

	Sure. You can just upload what you have onto BT, or if you prefer, you can email it to me at bill [at] billzhou [dot] net.		Sure. You can just upload what you have onto BT, or if you prefer, you can email it to me at bill [at] billzhou [dot] net.


			I put it in BT as a comment. You can do whatever you want with it. --[[User:Xplorer30\|Xplorer30]] 22:11, 12 April 2011 (UCT)

Thinklife: /* SAO Volume 2 chapter 4 */

2011-04-11T22:04:06Z

SAO Volume 2 chapter 4

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:04, 11 April 2011
Line 8:		Line 8:

	Hi, I am part of BCFM. I did part of this chapter for self study and have stopped to help with the main story. If you want I can send you the few pages I got done. --[[User:Xplorer30\|Xplorer30]] 20:38, 11 April 2011 (UCT)		Hi, I am part of BCFM. I did part of this chapter for self study and have stopped to help with the main story. If you want I can send you the few pages I got done. --[[User:Xplorer30\|Xplorer30]] 20:38, 11 April 2011 (UCT)

			Sure. You can just upload what you have onto BT, or if you prefer, you can email it to me at bill [at] billzhou [dot] net.

Xplorer30: /* SAO Volume 2 chapter 4 */ new section

2011-04-11T20:38:48Z

SAO Volume 2 chapter 4: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:38, 11 April 2011
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Ah, I didn't notice that, I was assuming that the ambiguity was merely that of not stating the answer to the first line, but stating that it was obvious. Nested ambiguities: that's tricky. --[[User:Saganatsu\|Saganatsu]] 06:24, 26 November 2010 (UTC)		Ah, I didn't notice that, I was assuming that the ambiguity was merely that of not stating the answer to the first line, but stating that it was obvious. Nested ambiguities: that's tricky. --[[User:Saganatsu\|Saganatsu]] 06:24, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

			== SAO Volume 2 chapter 4 ==

			Hi, I am part of BCFM. I did part of this chapter for self study and have stopped to help with the main story. If you want I can send you the few pages I got done. --[[User:Xplorer30\|Xplorer30]] 20:38, 11 April 2011 (UCT)

Saganatsu: +1: nice.

2010-11-26T06:24:41Z

+1: nice.

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:24, 26 November 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:

	You are right about that, but I was referring to the grammatical ambiguity. You could interpret the phrase to mean that "rather obvious" is the actual answer, or that the answer is rather obvious. In any case, it certainly is true that the answer becomes self-evident. [[User:Thinklife\|ThinkLife]] 02:34, 26 November 2010 (UTC)		You are right about that, but I was referring to the grammatical ambiguity. You could interpret the phrase to mean that "rather obvious" is the actual answer, or that the answer is rather obvious. In any case, it certainly is true that the answer becomes self-evident. [[User:Thinklife\|ThinkLife]] 02:34, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

			Ah, I didn't notice that, I was assuming that the ambiguity was merely that of not stating the answer to the first line, but stating that it was obvious. Nested ambiguities: that's tricky. --[[User:Saganatsu\|Saganatsu]] 06:24, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Thinklife at 02:34, 26 November 2010

2010-11-26T02:34:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:34, 26 November 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	But, given that analyzing the supposed ambitiousness of said second line requires thought, it could be said to not be ambiguous, as the mere fact of said ambiguity's existence resolves the ambiguity. Thus, the second line is completely, if not trivially, true.--[[User:Saganatsu\|Saganatsu]] 02:07, 26 November 2010 (UTC)		But, given that analyzing the supposed ambitiousness of said second line requires thought, it could be said to not be ambiguous, as the mere fact of said ambiguity's existence resolves the ambiguity. Thus, the second line is completely, if not trivially, true.--[[User:Saganatsu\|Saganatsu]] 02:07, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

			You are right about that, but I was referring to the grammatical ambiguity. You could interpret the phrase to mean that "rather obvious" is the actual answer, or that the answer is rather obvious. In any case, it certainly is true that the answer becomes self-evident. [[User:Thinklife\|ThinkLife]] 02:34, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Saganatsu: counterpoint

2010-11-26T02:07:53Z

counterpoint

New page

But, given that analyzing the supposed ambitiousness of said second line requires thought, it could be said to not be ambiguous, as the mere fact of said ambiguity's existence resolves the ambiguity. Thus, the second line is completely, if not trivially, true.--[[User:Saganatsu|Saganatsu]] 02:07, 26 November 2010 (UTC)