Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sekai no Owari no Encore:Volume 1 Record.5"

From Baka-Tsuki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Re:Proposed edits)
 
Line 22: Line 22:
   
 
--[[User:Code-Zero|Code-Zero]] ([[User talk:Code-Zero|talk]]) 21:09, 14 March 2015 (CDT)
 
--[[User:Code-Zero|Code-Zero]] ([[User talk:Code-Zero|talk]]) 21:09, 14 March 2015 (CDT)
  +
  +
:Ah, okay, "fool" ''would'' be too strong in that case. Maybe "foolish boy", "little boy", or just "boy", then, though I don't know how close you prefer to stick to the literal words used.
  +
  +
:I'll try to point it out if I see anything else that could be fixed up. I'm not too dedicated, unfortunately (which is why I never applied for an editor position...). -[[User:AKAAkira|Akira]] ([[User talk:AKAAkira|talk]]) 13:20, 22 March 2015 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 20:20, 22 March 2015

Proposed Edits[edit]

  • "Dummy"

Kind of a mild insult to use in this case. I usually see this being used between friends as light chastisement, not between enemies facing off each other like in this case. Much better to go with "fool".

  • "reflective index"

Pretty sure this is what you mean.

-99.235.235.81 13:36, 14 March 2015 (CDT) (AKAAkira too lazy to login)


Oops. Yup. "Refractive index" is definitely the corrrect term. I thought it was "reflective index" all this time lol... I'll change it right away. Thanks.

Yeah. Definitely the word "dummy" would be mild for dialogues between enemies. Though Achendia's manner of speech towards Ren was spoken in a way how a an adult would talk to a really small child (and also because she hasnt been taking him seriously). So the the word "fool" was too strong for translation.

It will be great if you can find more errors which needs fixing. Especially in grammars since I want it to be smooth.

--Code-Zero (talk) 21:09, 14 March 2015 (CDT)

Ah, okay, "fool" would be too strong in that case. Maybe "foolish boy", "little boy", or just "boy", then, though I don't know how close you prefer to stick to the literal words used.
I'll try to point it out if I see anything else that could be fixed up. I'm not too dedicated, unfortunately (which is why I never applied for an editor position...). -Akira (talk) 13:20, 22 March 2015 (CDT)