Difference between revisions of "User talk:Thinklife"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (counterpoint) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
But, given that analyzing the supposed ambitiousness of said second line requires thought, it could be said to not be ambiguous, as the mere fact of said ambiguity's existence resolves the ambiguity. Thus, the second line is completely, if not trivially, true.--[[User:Saganatsu|Saganatsu]] 02:07, 26 November 2010 (UTC) |
But, given that analyzing the supposed ambitiousness of said second line requires thought, it could be said to not be ambiguous, as the mere fact of said ambiguity's existence resolves the ambiguity. Thus, the second line is completely, if not trivially, true.--[[User:Saganatsu|Saganatsu]] 02:07, 26 November 2010 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | You are right about that, but I was referring to the grammatical ambiguity. You could interpret the phrase to mean that "rather obvious" is the actual answer, or that the answer is rather obvious. In any case, it certainly is true that the answer becomes self-evident. [[User:Thinklife|ThinkLife]] 02:34, 26 November 2010 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 04:34, 26 November 2010
But, given that analyzing the supposed ambitiousness of said second line requires thought, it could be said to not be ambiguous, as the mere fact of said ambiguity's existence resolves the ambiguity. Thus, the second line is completely, if not trivially, true.--Saganatsu 02:07, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
You are right about that, but I was referring to the grammatical ambiguity. You could interpret the phrase to mean that "rather obvious" is the actual answer, or that the answer is rather obvious. In any case, it certainly is true that the answer becomes self-evident. ThinkLife 02:34, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
