Editing Talk:Campione!:Volume 9 Chapter1 (section)

== Excaliber ==

As in the legends, isn't it said that "Excaliber" is a sword with great brilliance, cutting through everything with no effect on the blade? Here it is mentioned that it is corroded and lost its brilliance while embedded in earth. --[[User:Chancs|Chancs]] ([[User talk:Chancs|talk]]) 00:24, 23 September 2012 (CDT)

It's this author's take on the King Arthur legend -- with the hero gone, the sword has lost its power. I'm not sure what you're questioning exactly. -[[User:Zzhk|Zzhk]] ([[User talk:Zzhk|talk]]) 03:45, 23 September 2012 (CDT)

No no, what I am asking is, how "Excaliber" being the most powerful sword with no mark of its battles on the edges and great brilliance have gone down to being corroded and lusterless? The reference is the past and not the present (as quoted "with the hero gone, the sword has lost its power" ) --[[User:Chancs|Chancs]] ([[User talk:Chancs|talk]]) 02:19, 24 September 2012 (CDT)

I think he's asking for spoilers. [[User:Florza|Florza]] ([[User talk:Florza|talk]]) 02:32, 24 September 2012 (CDT)

Offfooo...not spoilers. Wherever you read about "Excaliber", it describes it as above -- "cutting through steel like butter(?), ever shining, a majestic sword" and what not. Here in the chapter, it says "corroded and lusterless" which I feel contradictory.  --[[User:Chancs|Chancs]] ([[User talk:Chancs|talk]]) 02:51, 24 September 2012 (CDT)

'with the hero gone, the sword has lost its power' = without King Arthur around, the sword has lost its power. Exactly what the words mean. This is how Campione's author has chosen to portray the sword, so that's why your question isn't really a question, it's already been answered. There is no mistake in the translation. [[User:Florza|Florza]] ([[User talk:Florza|talk]]) 03:02, 24 September 2012 (CDT)