Editing User talk:Javiersansano

Javiersansano, I think you misunderstood the discussion on the IS Main Talk Page. It was not to change all "eh"s back but only "ehh*~"s (ie: those which have more than one "h"s and a "~" at the end. Furthermore, I think you don't know this but [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stuttering#Primary_behaviors stuttering is denoted by hyphens(-) for short pauses and three dots(...) for long pauses]. This is a common mistake here that I was correcting and you overturned '''hours''' of hard work on my part. Not only that but we put SFX in *asterisks* and you undid that as well. Please keep these points in mind next time. I will undo your changes on [[IS:Volume3 Chapter2]] if you have made any similar changes elsewhere then correct them immediately. [[User:Zero2001|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001|Talk]] -  15:05, 9 September 2011 (CDT)

To add to the above, the reason why the use of comma in stuttering is wrong is because it causes confusion as to whether it is indeed stuttering. For example: "I-It" when written using commas is "I, It" where "I" can be confused with self-reference (me) instead of stuttering. There are many other instances. I-Ichika, You-Yourself, In-Instead, etc. Please be careful next time. Thank you. [[User:Zero2001|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001|Talk]] -  15:20, 9 September 2011 (CDT)

Again. You did it again. Now I'll have a headache fixing '''while''' making sure your edits '''aren't''' affected. [[User:Zero2001|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001|Talk]] -  11:48, 3 October 2011 (CDT)

Perhaps you didn't do it on purpose. Were you going through the history when you accidentally clicked the edit link, not knowing that it would edit the revision being viewed and not the current revision? If so then I beg your pardon. It's not your fault. [[User:Zero2001|Zero2001]] - [[User_talk:Zero2001|Talk]] -  12:10, 3 October 2011 (CDT)