Difference between revisions of "Talk:Utsuro no Hako:Volume5 Prologue"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "Let me ask something that its confusing me... the name of the being that give the boxes its zero (0) or O as letter? I'm pretty sure that it name is zero because it identify itse...") |
|||
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Also, why everything is bold? |
Also, why everything is bold? |
||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | I still think it's O (as letter) like OH, it sound like something omnipotent rather than zero, personaly i think that way. But yeah, it's just my assumtion, As for why it's in bold, probably it's the same with the original. As far as i remember, most prolog, or maybe dream where they meet O, written in bold. [[User:Tony Yon|Tony Yon]] 23:09, 30 July 2012 (CDT) |
||
+ | |||
+ | :It's the letter. You'll see why. Also yes, bold is for prologues. [[User:EusthEnoptEron|EusthEnoptEron]] 00:17, 31 July 2012 (CDT) |
||
+ | |||
+ | :: Then, do the previous references to '0' actually refer to 'O'? [[User:LB Kasen|LB_Kasen]] 16:09, 7 August 2012 (CDT) |
||
+ | ::: Yup. I used '0' first, because I mistakenly associated O's name with the title. [[User:EusthEnoptEron|EusthEnoptEron]] 16:18, 7 August 2012 (CDT) |
||
+ | :::: I'm guessing from the exposition in the prologue that 'O' is a letter in his name or something. But I wouldn't put aside the 'O' & '0' relation completely from what I've read so far. It's entirely possible the author intended for this alternate view of his 'name', considering all that talk of vectors. Unless O doesn't mean zero in Japan >.> [[User:MatrixM|MatrixM]] ([[User talk:MatrixM|talk]]) 15:06, 16 July 2013 (CDT) |
Latest revision as of 22:06, 16 July 2013
Let me ask something that its confusing me... the name of the being that give the boxes its zero (0) or O as letter? I'm pretty sure that it name is zero because it identify itself as a coordinate, therefore 0,0 or 0. If I'm wrong, be kind and point me in the right direction.
Also, why everything is bold?
I still think it's O (as letter) like OH, it sound like something omnipotent rather than zero, personaly i think that way. But yeah, it's just my assumtion, As for why it's in bold, probably it's the same with the original. As far as i remember, most prolog, or maybe dream where they meet O, written in bold. Tony Yon 23:09, 30 July 2012 (CDT)
- It's the letter. You'll see why. Also yes, bold is for prologues. EusthEnoptEron 00:17, 31 July 2012 (CDT)
- Then, do the previous references to '0' actually refer to 'O'? LB_Kasen 16:09, 7 August 2012 (CDT)
- Yup. I used '0' first, because I mistakenly associated O's name with the title. EusthEnoptEron 16:18, 7 August 2012 (CDT)
- I'm guessing from the exposition in the prologue that 'O' is a letter in his name or something. But I wouldn't put aside the 'O' & '0' relation completely from what I've read so far. It's entirely possible the author intended for this alternate view of his 'name', considering all that talk of vectors. Unless O doesn't mean zero in Japan >.> MatrixM (talk) 15:06, 16 July 2013 (CDT)
- Yup. I used '0' first, because I mistakenly associated O's name with the title. EusthEnoptEron 16:18, 7 August 2012 (CDT)
- Then, do the previous references to '0' actually refer to 'O'? LB_Kasen 16:09, 7 August 2012 (CDT)