Difference between revisions of "Talk:Log Horizon Specific Guidelines"
KuroiHikari (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
I think artisan is fine, unless you prefer craftsman. Anyway, goldsmith is too specific. --[[User:KuroiHikari|KuroiHikari]] ([[User_talk:KuroiHikari|Talk]] | ) 05:29, 11 November 2013 (CST) |
I think artisan is fine, unless you prefer craftsman. Anyway, goldsmith is too specific. --[[User:KuroiHikari|KuroiHikari]] ([[User_talk:KuroiHikari|Talk]] | ) 05:29, 11 November 2013 (CST) |
||
+ | |||
+ | If goldsmith is to specific could [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bench_jeweler Jeweler] fit? It's cover a wider range of skills (goldsmith, stonesetting, engraving,..), match with the description of a class working with gem and precious metal and is quite common on MMORPG--[[Special:Contributions/90.60.178.76|90.60.178.76]] 19:36, 11 November 2013 (CST) |
Revision as of 03:36, 12 November 2013
In the sub class "細工師 = Artisan" don't match, artisan is a generic term and Google translate "細工師 = Goldsmith"--90.45.134.134 00:59, 11 November 2013 (CST)
I was going for craftsman but I looked around and people were using artisan. --KuroiHikari (Talk | ) 01:12, 11 November 2013 (CST)
Herethey describe the sub class as working with precious metal and gem.--90.45.134.134 01:28, 11 November 2013 (CST)
I think artisan is fine, unless you prefer craftsman. Anyway, goldsmith is too specific. --KuroiHikari (Talk | ) 05:29, 11 November 2013 (CST)
If goldsmith is to specific could Jeweler fit? It's cover a wider range of skills (goldsmith, stonesetting, engraving,..), match with the description of a class working with gem and precious metal and is quite common on MMORPG--90.60.178.76 19:36, 11 November 2013 (CST)