Talk:Mahouka Koukou no Rettousei:Volume 5 Summer break: Difference between revisions
Lighthalzen (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Stylistic Preference == | |||
...... | ...... | ||
| Line 8: | Line 10: | ||
Are you referring to the edits by Koakuma? I read through it once and then took a look at the edits made. I'm not an English major but some of those edits feel awkward.--[[User:Lighthalzen|Lighthalzen]] ([[User talk:Lighthalzen|talk]]) 14:50, 1 November 2012 (CDT) | Are you referring to the edits by Koakuma? I read through it once and then took a look at the edits made. I'm not an English major but some of those edits feel awkward.--[[User:Lighthalzen|Lighthalzen]] ([[User talk:Lighthalzen|talk]]) 14:50, 1 November 2012 (CDT) | ||
Certainly, it is in your right as a translator to undo any changes you see unfit. It is clear that there is a stylistic preference rather than errors or mistakes that should not have been changed by [[User:Koakuma]]. Surely those edits were made in good faith, but not everyone can recognize stylistic preferences. I, for one, made similar mistakes when I first started editing. Just for clarification, the stylist preference I recognized was with honorifics for names - leaving out the "-" between them. -[[User:Milki|milki]] ([[User talk:Milki|talk]]) 15:36, 1 November 2012 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 20:36, 1 November 2012
Stylistic Preference
......
Alright, now I'm just a little bit.. mad.
Editors are supposed to read around before jumping in and changing shit right? Something as minor as respecting stylistic preference would be a pretty trivial reason to lose a translator over right?
...right?
Are you referring to the edits by Koakuma? I read through it once and then took a look at the edits made. I'm not an English major but some of those edits feel awkward.--Lighthalzen (talk) 14:50, 1 November 2012 (CDT)
Certainly, it is in your right as a translator to undo any changes you see unfit. It is clear that there is a stylistic preference rather than errors or mistakes that should not have been changed by User:Koakuma. Surely those edits were made in good faith, but not everyone can recognize stylistic preferences. I, for one, made similar mistakes when I first started editing. Just for clarification, the stylist preference I recognized was with honorifics for names - leaving out the "-" between them. -milki (talk) 15:36, 1 November 2012 (CDT)