User talk:Thinklife: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m counterpoint |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 02:07, 26 November 2010
But, given that analyzing the supposed ambitiousness of said second line requires thought, it could be said to not be ambiguous, as the mere fact of said ambiguity's existence resolves the ambiguity. Thus, the second line is completely, if not trivially, true.--Saganatsu 02:07, 26 November 2010 (UTC)