Difference between revisions of "Talk:Konpeki no Kantai"

From Baka-Tsuki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "== What is this? == As an frequent reader of books in the genre 'Alternate History', I found the premise behind this story to be interesting. Don't mistake: the premise is a...")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== What is this? ==
 
== What is this? ==
As an frequent reader of books in the genre 'Alternate History', I found the premise behind this story to be interesting. Don't mistake: the premise is a wish-fulfillment fantasy for such Japanese who still smart from World War II. It takes considerable liberties concerning what Admiral Yamamoto might have known April 18, 1943. The chances he knew much of anything about nuclear bombs, let alone nuclear powered submarines, are next to nil. And I've heard (though not witnessed for myself yet) that the attitudes shown by some of the characters towards the USA are every bit as ugly as those held by the USA towards Japan in the 1940s.
+
As an frequent reader of books in the genre 'Alternate History', I found the premise behind this story to be interesting. Don't mistake: the story is a wish-fulfillment fantasy for such Japanese who still smart from World War II. It takes considerable liberties concerning what Admiral Yamamoto might have known April 18, 1943. The chances he knew much of anything about nuclear bombs, let alone nuclear powered submarines, are next to nil. And I've heard (though not witnessed for myself yet) that the attitudes shown by some of the characters towards the USA are every bit as ugly as those held by the USA towards Japan in the 1940s.
   
 
But the story might be fun anyways. --[[User:Rpapo|Rpapo]] ([[User talk:Rpapo|talk]]) 19:53, 24 January 2017 (CET)
 
But the story might be fun anyways. --[[User:Rpapo|Rpapo]] ([[User talk:Rpapo|talk]]) 19:53, 24 January 2017 (CET)

Revision as of 20:53, 24 January 2017

What is this?

As an frequent reader of books in the genre 'Alternate History', I found the premise behind this story to be interesting. Don't mistake: the story is a wish-fulfillment fantasy for such Japanese who still smart from World War II. It takes considerable liberties concerning what Admiral Yamamoto might have known April 18, 1943. The chances he knew much of anything about nuclear bombs, let alone nuclear powered submarines, are next to nil. And I've heard (though not witnessed for myself yet) that the attitudes shown by some of the characters towards the USA are every bit as ugly as those held by the USA towards Japan in the 1940s.

But the story might be fun anyways. --Rpapo (talk) 19:53, 24 January 2017 (CET)