Difference between revisions of "User talk:Mane"
(Good editing, applause.) |
(→Appreciatoin: new section) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Gj editing. Double checked most of it, seems good. |
Gj editing. Double checked most of it, seems good. |
||
Nice work. - --[[Special:Contributions/83.227.250.155|83.227.250.155]] 20:30, 2 April 2012 (CDT) aka novium (when using a real terminal) |
Nice work. - --[[Special:Contributions/83.227.250.155|83.227.250.155]] 20:30, 2 April 2012 (CDT) aka novium (when using a real terminal) |
||
| + | |||
| + | Hi, regarding the latest edits for Campione volume 3 prologue, though I find the flow of the sentence awkward, I shall refrain from continuing to edit that part from now on. Given that a third party has verified that the wording is correct and stated that the usage is just a bit old fashioned, which fits Lucretia's character, and has thus reverted my edit. I have no intention of starting an editing war here, so I shall leave it as it is. Thanks for your efforts at editing. :D [[User:Zakashi|Zakashi]] 08:57, 8 August 2012 (CDT) |
||
| + | |||
| + | Please do not perform such extensive edits, especially large scale modification of tenses, before consulting the original translator. In this case, [[User:Kadi]]. --[[User:Zzhk|Zzhk]] ([[User talk:Zzhk|talk]]) 10:31, 8 September 2012 (CDT) |
||
| + | |||
| + | It wasn't translated by me, but w/e. We decided to translate Campione into past tense. Don't change it. If sentence fragmentation was done on purpose, think about that purpose and change it accordingly. Tenses aside, I like some of the edits.--[[User:Kadi|Kadi]] ([[User talk:Kadi|talk]]) 11:18, 8 September 2012 (CDT) |
||
| + | |||
| + | Oops, right, my mistake, Kadi just posts the chapters done by a mysterious anonymous contributor. Anyway, just out of curiosity, is there any particular reason you feel compelled to prefer <nowiki><b></nowiki> tags over triple apostrophes when the output is identical? --[[User:Zzhk|Zzhk]] ([[User talk:Zzhk|talk]]) 04:33, 10 September 2012 (CDT) |
||
| + | |||
| + | == Appreciatoin == |
||
| + | |||
| + | Thank you Mane for those edits. The texts are now very much with a flow to it. --[[User:Chancs|Chancs]] ([[User talk:Chancs|talk]]) 01:02, 18 September 2012 (CDT) |
||
Latest revision as of 08:02, 18 September 2012
Gj editing. Double checked most of it, seems good. Nice work. - --83.227.250.155 20:30, 2 April 2012 (CDT) aka novium (when using a real terminal)
Hi, regarding the latest edits for Campione volume 3 prologue, though I find the flow of the sentence awkward, I shall refrain from continuing to edit that part from now on. Given that a third party has verified that the wording is correct and stated that the usage is just a bit old fashioned, which fits Lucretia's character, and has thus reverted my edit. I have no intention of starting an editing war here, so I shall leave it as it is. Thanks for your efforts at editing. :D Zakashi 08:57, 8 August 2012 (CDT)
Please do not perform such extensive edits, especially large scale modification of tenses, before consulting the original translator. In this case, User:Kadi. --Zzhk (talk) 10:31, 8 September 2012 (CDT)
It wasn't translated by me, but w/e. We decided to translate Campione into past tense. Don't change it. If sentence fragmentation was done on purpose, think about that purpose and change it accordingly. Tenses aside, I like some of the edits.--Kadi (talk) 11:18, 8 September 2012 (CDT)
Oops, right, my mistake, Kadi just posts the chapters done by a mysterious anonymous contributor. Anyway, just out of curiosity, is there any particular reason you feel compelled to prefer <b> tags over triple apostrophes when the output is identical? --Zzhk (talk) 04:33, 10 September 2012 (CDT)
Appreciatoin[edit]
Thank you Mane for those edits. The texts are now very much with a flow to it. --Chancs (talk) 01:02, 18 September 2012 (CDT)
