User talk:Shift

OreImo Editing

Hi shift, I saw your questions on Chaos' talk page. As for editing, you can just go ahead and post the changes you deem necessary. If there are incomplete/mistaken translations that you aren't sure of, use the talk page and I'm sure Chaos can clear up any issues. Editing in batches is perfectly fine. I usually go through quickly first to make changes to punctuation i.e. multiple hyphens into an em dash, curly quotes into straight ones, ellipses consitency, et cetera. After then I usually will go back and make changes to the text. Unfortunately I can't assist with the questions you posted on the Oreimo V11C4 discussion page; I don't have the originals nor could I read them if I did.

It's good to have another editor working on this, if you have any other questions I'll be happy to assist as best I can. Kory 15:06, 6 June 2013 (CDT)

Great. Thanks for your response! Especially with what seems to be such a small active team, it's good to know whether something like that would put me at odds with anyone on the project, or otherwise cause any trouble/problems. Just a note (and I may have said this already), but I may be a bit slow to start, as I'm still trying to get comfortable with the idea of editing, as well as trying to figure out what I should or shouldn't be focusing on/changing. I've edited plenty of my own papers throughout the course of my education, but rarely have I ever worked on anyone else's work, never mind trying to keep the final product consistent with the original from which it is TLed.

As far as the actual editing of OreImo v11 goes, while I don't mind a bit of redundancy on my end (esp. since I might take a bit of time before actually committing anything to the wiki), does it make any difference to you whether I begin from v11c04 or work my way back from the v12 prologue? Logically it makes sense to get v11c04 polished off first, but assuming I am able to make any non-trivial headway it might be faster to work from multiple directions. For the moment, I mostly intend to go through and tweak any obvious offenders while I try to figure out some of the finer points that are bugging me, or parts that might merit more substantial editing and thus require feedback from you, Chaos, or anyone else who might be active on the project.

Ah, right! Since I'm just starting I should probably point out that by no means am I implying my work will necessarily be sufficient for any particular section. Personally I consider input from multiple individuals generally superior to a singular viewpoint, anyway.

-shift (talk) 16:58, 6 June 2013 (CDT)