Difference between revisions of "Talk:Meeting:March302014"

From Baka-Tsuki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 181: Line 181:
 
== x ==
 
== x ==
 
== x ==
 
== x ==
  +
  +
  +
==Complete Log of the Meeting==
  +
{| class="wikitable collapsible collapsed"
  +
! Complete Log of the Meeting
  +
|-
  +
|
  +
<pre>
  +
<nowiki>
  +
15:00 < stellarroze> ...
  +
15:00 < Lord-Simon> ...
  +
15:00 < Vallor> You didn't found a better version?
  +
15:01 < Misogi> Removed.
  +
15:01 < stellarroze> my lord...
  +
15:01 < Lord-Simon> ?
  +
15:01 < hayashi> hrm
  +
15:01 * DarkoNeko claps hands
  +
15:01 <&DarkoNeko> alright people, it's time
  +
15:01 < hayashi> it's already the appointed time
  +
15:01 < Lord-Simon> So.... where's TLG ?
  +
15:01 < stellarroze> let's wait till 14:15
  +
15:01 < Lord-Simon> lol
  +
15:02 < stellarroze> if he's not here then the meeting will be considered over
  +
15:02 < stellarroze> 13 minutes more
  +
15:02 < Mystes> lol
  +
15:02 < stellarroze> mystes ;_;
  +
15:02 < cloudii> It's 7am in the morning for him… so… xD
  +
15:02 < Mystes> 9AM for me~
  +
15:02 < Lord-Simon> 3pm for me
  +
15:02 < hayashi> it's 9pm
  +
15:02 < Misogi> 3pm
  +
15:02 <&DarkoNeko> whyever did he chose that time, I cannot fathom
  +
15:02 < victorrama> 8pm
  +
15:03 < hayashi> and liverpool-spurs starts in 2 hours
  +
15:03 < Lord-Simon> btw
  +
15:03 < Lord-Simon> don't forget to change the time
  +
15:03 < Lord-Simon> on your clocks
  +
15:03 < Mystes> i did
  +
15:03 < victorrama> I'm restraining myself the best i can
  +
15:03 < Mystes> long ago
  +
15:03 < Vallor> It is so stupid btw...
  +
15:03 < krytyk> obviously, its to pamper us, europeans
  +
15:03 <&DarkoNeko> long ago, like, last month ? :D
  +
15:04 * stellarroze hugs victorrama
  +
15:04 < krytyk> thus this time was chosen
  +
15:04 < Mystes> pretty much
  +
15:04 <&DarkoNeko> eh, i doubt it
  +
15:04 <&DarkoNeko> it ws to including japan/singapoure
  +
15:04 <&DarkoNeko> else it would have been in the evening eruopean time
  +
15:04 * Misogi is tempted to post WTF things.
  +
15:04 <&DarkoNeko> and early afternoon for him
  +
15:04 < hayashi> lol
  +
15:05 <&DarkoNeko> Misogi, we're supposed to start soon , so...
  +
15:05 < hayashi> where are all the singaporeans D:
  +
15:05 < Vallor> Calm down Misogi
  +
15:05 < Lord-Simon> "supposed"
  +
15:05 < cloudii> Teh Ping said he'd be late if at all
  +
15:05 < stellarroze> let's wait 10 more minutes...
  +
15:05 < Misogi> Well, "supposed".
  +
15:05 -!- xenocross [[email protected]] has joined #Baka-Tsuki
  +
15:05 < stellarroze> hi xenocross
  +
15:05 < Vallor> Post them on twitter. :D
  +
15:05 < Mystes> no tlg
  +
15:05 < Misogi> Need to kill some time, after all.
  +
15:05 < Mystes> kick him
  +
15:05 < stellarroze> tweet tweet
  +
15:05 < Mystes> not useful
  +
15:05 < krytyk> well, stella, heroes always come late
  +
15:05 < Lord-Simon> ...
  +
15:05 < Lord-Simon> Well
  +
15:05 < xenocross> hi...
  +
15:05 < krytyk> thats truth of this universe
  +
15:05 <&DarkoNeko> well, we can always chat on topic. I can answer questions relative to what's under the wiki hood
  +
15:05 < Lord-Simon> We could start sending mails
  +
15:05 < Vallor> hi!
  +
15:05 < Mystes> sup xeno
  +
15:05 <&DarkoNeko> krytyk, that's waht she said
  +
15:06 <&DarkoNeko> Lord-Simon, what's this, the 90 ?
  +
15:06 < Mystes> kk, i should make myself more recognizable
  +
15:06 < krytyk> ke
  +
15:06 -!- Mystes is now known as Kira0802
  +
15:06 < Lord-Simon> 90 ?
  +
15:06 <&DarkoNeko> the 90'
  +
15:06 < hayashi> not recognisable enough kira
  +
15:06 < hayashi> can you change your nick to treehugger
  +
15:06 < krytyk> add two mozer zeros
  +
15:06 < Lord-Simon> lol
  +
15:06 < Kira0802> no
  +
15:06 < Kira0802> :<
  +
15:06 < stellarroze> kira ;_;
  +
15:06 < krytyk> more zeros*
  +
15:06 < Lord-Simon> 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
  +
15:06 < Kira0802> my friend has a vid of me spparently fucking a tree
  +
15:06 <&DarkoNeko> we already have Code-Zero
  +
15:06 < Kira0802> not posting it
  +
15:06 < Lord-Simon> kira...
  +
15:07 <&DarkoNeko> ...thanks for telling us that
  +
15:07 < Misogi> You shoudn't.
  +
15:07 < Kira0802> truth or dare, man.
  +
15:07 < krytyk> a riddle, of how much zeros does code-zero consist
  +
15:07 < Lord-Simon> 0
  +
15:07 < Kira0802> 2001 0.
  +
15:07 < Kira0802> :DDD
  +
15:07 <&DarkoNeko> one
  +
15:07 < Kira0802> is zero here?
  +
15:07 < stellarroze> Zero2001 ?
  +
15:07 <&DarkoNeko> rude
  +
15:07 < hayashi> I hope not
  +
15:08 < victorrama> Which zero
  +
15:08 < Kira0802> oh, zzhk is here
  +
15:08 * Kira0802 slaps zzhk around a bit with a large trout
  +
15:08 < krytyk> zzhk was here for hours now
  +
15:08 < victorrama> I think he wont join
  +
15:08 < stellarroze> grrrrrrrrrr
  +
15:08 < victorrama> He will when i snap
  +
15:08 < Kira0802> never seen zz somewhere else than #campione
  +
15:08 < victorrama> To quote ne
  +
15:08 < victorrama> *me
  +
15:08 < krytyk> wron g chan victor
  +
15:08 < krytyk> quotebot on campione
  +
15:08 <&DarkoNeko> 'nyone up for a game of go ?
  +
15:08 <&DarkoNeko> O'm bored
  +
15:09 < krytyk> if quotebot was here he'd zzhk'd overheat
  +
15:09 < victorrama> He transcend chans
  +
15:09 < krytyk> zzhk*
  +
15:09 * Misogi has been traumatized while studying.
  +
15:09 < Lord-Simon> quote bot...
  +
15:09 -!- mib_cfp1sj [[email protected]] has joined #Baka-Tsuki
  +
15:09 < Lord-Simon> tlg ?
  +
15:09 < Kira0802> is this TLG?
  +
15:09 < cloudii> ^^
  +
15:09 < stellarroze> oh yeah
  +
15:09 < stellarroze> tlg has evolved into a mib!
  +
15:09 < Vallor> ^^
  +
15:09 < Lord-Simon> lol
  +
15:09 < hayashi> brb checking up on my fleet
  +
15:09 < krytyk> or devolved?
  +
15:09 < stellarroze> but mibs never last :(
  +
15:09 <&DarkoNeko> jumpping to conclusion much ? lol
  +
15:09 < victorrama> Lul
  +
15:10 * Code-Zero slaps mib_cfp1sj around a bit with a large fishbot
  +
15:10 < Vallor> 5 minutes still or he is here?
  +
15:10 < stellarroze> he might be the mib
  +
15:10 -!- Lery [[email protected]] has joined #Baka-Tsuki
  +
15:10 < hayashi> oooh
  +
15:10 < Kira0802> i can wait longer
  +
15:10 < Kira0802> hi lery
  +
15:10 < stellarroze> Lery!
  +
15:10 * stellarroze hugs Lery
  +
15:10 * Kira0802 hugs Lery
  +
15:10 < Lery> Hello there ^^
  +
15:10 < hayashi> maybe we should wait
  +
15:10 < DefaultMelody> Waiting...
  +
15:10 < Lord-Simon> hi
  +
15:11 < hayashi> more people seem to be popping up
  +
15:11 < victorrama> I'm used to wait
  +
15:11 < Kira0802> tlg is waiting for a large crowd
  +
15:11 < Lord-Simon> That what's she said.
  +
15:11 < Lery> Well, it's 13:11 GMT only...
  +
15:11 < stellarroze> no
  +
15:11 < Vallor> He could have chosen a better nickname...
  +
15:11 < stellarroze> it's 14:11
  +
15:11 < victorrama> ^
  +
15:11 < Lery> She ???
  +
15:11 < victorrama> Who's she
  +
15:11 * DarkoNeko sighs
  +
15:11 < victorrama> I only see stella
  +
15:11 < stellarroze> .g god is a girl
  +
15:11 < Kira0802> It's 1PM GMT for me
  +
15:11 < stellarroze> :(
  +
15:12 < Kira0802> WTF
  +
15:12 < Kira0802> my converter
  +
15:12 < hayashi> no bots here
  +
15:12 < stellarroze> no internet bot
  +
15:12 < xenocross> because it said "general meeting". I thought I have to attend at least
  +
15:12 < Lery> Really ? Didn't know it
  +
15:12 <&DarkoNeko> Lord-Simon, your joke failed hard lol
  +
15:12 < Vallor> Hi lery btw!
  +
15:12 < Lord-Simon> yeah...
  +
15:12 < Lery> Hullo Vallor ^^
  +
15:12 < stellarroze> is oni coming as well?
  +
15:12 < Lery> No idea
  +
15:12 < Misogi> Well, hi Lery (weird to say that, though).
  +
15:12 < Kira0802> idl
  +
15:12 < Kira0802> idk*
  +
15:12 < krytyk> what if
  +
15:12 < cloudii> …he would probably be here by now if he was…
  +
15:13 < krytyk> tlg is already among us
  +
15:13 < Lery> @Misogi, why ?
  +
15:13 < hayashi> hm
  +
15:13 < Misogi> Twitter.
  +
15:13 < hayashi> imma try buzz ping on fb
  +
15:13 < Lery> Is he ?
  +
15:13 <&DarkoNeko> so, what part of http://www.baka-tsuki.org/project/index.php?title=Meeting:March302014 culd we do without him ?
  +
15:13 < Kira0802> WHAT IF GOD WAS ONE OF US
  +
15:13 < cloudii> ping said that he'd be late on fb
  +
15:13 < Vallor> xD
  +
15:13 < hayashi> but it's 9pm+ in sg
  +
15:13 < Lord-Simon> kira.. calm down
  +
15:13 < hayashi> he should be home by now
  +
15:13 < Kira0802> JUST A SLOB LIKE ONE OF US
  +
15:13 < Lery> Any way to magnify text using Mibbit ?
  +
15:13 <&DarkoNeko> we could strart with cloudii's "Modify, simplify and remove outdated rules from the guidelines: "
  +
15:13 <&DarkoNeko> Lery, like any other webpage, ctrl+ +
  +
15:14 < Lord-Simon> do you use chrome ?
  +
15:14 < Misogi> Yep, it requires everyone's help.
  +
15:14 < hayashi> also
  +
15:14 < hayashi> where is KH
  +
15:14 < Vallor> Maybe Big Brother is watching us...
  +
15:14 < hayashi> oh wait
  +
15:14 < hayashi> he's back in camp
  +
15:14 < hayashi> XD
  +
15:14 < victorrama> Kira
  +
15:14 < cloudii> I'm in favor of DarkoNeko's suggestion to get started anyways xD
  +
15:14 <&DarkoNeko> could someone summarize https://www.baka-tsuki.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=8726 it's too long didn't read :D
  +
15:14 < Lery> @DarkoNeko, yeah, but the interface will then be magnified as well
  +
15:14 < victorrama> He'd slap me
  +
15:14 <&DarkoNeko> Lery, aye
  +
15:14 < Kira0802> wtf darko
  +
15:14 < cloudii> I can talk it through
  +
15:14 <&DarkoNeko> Part 2: Migrate all the Wiki rules from the Forums, and archive the old rules. <- YES.
  +
15:14 < Lord-Simon> 15 more minutes and then start ?
  +
15:14 < Kira0802> it's like 3 pages long
  +
15:15 <&DarkoNeko> actually, why the fuck are they on the forum
  +
15:15 < Kira0802> because forums = life
  +
15:15 < hayashi> that's one of the points
  +
15:15 < cloudii> 1). Remove the One Week deadline from the project creation rules
  +
15:15 < hayashi> the wiki and the forums are not meshing
  +
15:15 < cloudii> 2). Change the wording of the {{Warning:ATP}}
  +
15:15 < Lery> Well, actually we could talk about Cloud's points.
  +
15:15 < hayashi> something needs to be done about that
  +
15:15 <&DarkoNeko> meshing ?
  +
15:15 < Kira0802> >Part 1: Clarify Ambiguous (outdated) Baka-Tsuki guidelines.
  +
15:15 < Kira0802> >Part 2: Migrate all the Wiki rules from the Forums, and archive the old rules.
  +
15:15 < Kira0802> >Part 3: Create comprehensive Help Pages to improve the experience of brand-new members.
  +
15:15 <&DarkoNeko> hey, let cloud explain lol
  +
15:15 < Lord-Simon> *sigh*
  +
15:15 <&DarkoNeko> don't spam on his parade
  +
15:15 < hayashi> the forums is supposed to function in tandem with the wiki
  +
15:15 < Lord-Simon> Stop here
  +
15:16 < hayashi> at least that's the way I see it
  +
15:16 < Lord-Simon> Choose a person to explain
  +
15:16 < Lord-Simon> wait for explanation
  +
15:16 < hayashi> but currently it's not
  +
15:16 < cloudii> Um, can someone chair the meeting?
  +
15:16 < Lord-Simon> get a mediator
  +
15:16 < Kira0802> TLG
  +
15:16 < Lord-Simon> and do the stuff
  +
15:16 <&DarkoNeko> what does a chair do ?
  +
15:16 < Lord-Simon> I can
  +
15:16 < hayashi> can we just get cloudi to explain everything
  +
15:16 < cloudii> sure, Simon can chair
  +
15:16 <&DarkoNeko> yes, let's do that
  +
15:16 < victorrama> simon be mediator
  +
15:16 < Misogi> Well, I can handle a part of the task too.
  +
15:16 * Kira0802 hugs Cloudii
  +
15:16 < stellarroze> i vote for simon!
  +
15:16 <&DarkoNeko> i can ban the unrelies XD
  +
15:16 * stellarroze hugs cloudii
  +
15:16 <&DarkoNeko> unrulies*
  +
15:17 < victorrama> Don't Kill me
  +
15:17 * Kira0802 hugs stella
  +
15:17 < krytyk> chat discipline~
  +
15:17 < cloudii> Okays, so Part 1 :Clarify Ambiguous (outdated) Baka-Tsuki guidelines.
  +
15:17 * stellarroze hugs victorrama
  +
15:17 <&DarkoNeko> shh
  +
15:17 < hayashi> STOP HUGGING
  +
15:17 < cloudii> The first rule that comes to mind that is outdated
  +
15:17 < Lery> Uh, I think that it's only DarkoNeko who has the rights to moderate the channel currently.
  +
15:17 < cloudii> is the one week requirement to complete a new chapter
  +
15:17 < Kira0802> we can delete that
  +
15:17 < cloudii> for a new project
  +
15:17 < Misogi> Agreed.
  +
15:17 < cloudii> just delete that rule
  +
15:17 < Lery> Agreed
  +
15:17 < Lord-Simon> People
  +
15:17 < victorrama> ^
  +
15:17 < cloudii> Motion to agree?
  +
15:17 < Lord-Simon> Shut up
  +
15:17 <&DarkoNeko> why is that rule a problem ?
  +
15:17 < stellarroze> one month?
  +
15:17 < cloudii> Okay
  +
15:17 < Lord-Simon> Thank you
  +
15:18 < cloudii> so, it's a problem
  +
15:18 < Lord-Simon> Cloidii, once agian please
  +
15:18 < Kira0802> No, if therE's not enough, we can simply not approve
  +
15:18 < cloudii> because most projects don't even follow that guideline
  +
15:18 < Kira0802> instead of going all the way to delete it
  +
15:18 < cloudii> in the first place
  +
15:18 < Lery> Well, it's stressing the translators who would like to begin...
  +
15:18 < stellarroze> hmmm
  +
15:18 < cloudii> theoretically
  +
15:18 < stellarroze> fair enough
  +
15:18 < cloudii> any project
  +
15:18 < victorrama> Listen to simon. Please stay wuite ,:now
  +
15:18 < cloudii> tagged with ATP, is supposed to be deleted within a week
  +
15:18 < cloudii> unless the translator gets permission from a supervisor
  +
15:18 < cloudii> to get it extended
  +
15:19 <&DarkoNeko> okay, so a little pause
  +
15:19 < krytyk> a translator can first translate a chapter, and then start a project, if he is determined he will do that. I believe that rule was made to avoid people pick up new project, and then go MIA
  +
15:19 <&DarkoNeko> choice 1) keep it 2) extend it to a month 3) remove it
  +
15:19 < Kira0802> 3.
  +
15:19 < Vallor> 2/3
  +
15:19 < stellarroze> 2.
  +
15:19 < krytyk> 1
  +
15:19 < Misogi> 3
  +
15:19 < Lery> 3
  +
15:19 < cloudii> 3
  +
15:19 < Vallor> I'd prefer the third though
  +
15:19 < hayashi> 2
  +
15:19 <&DarkoNeko> krytyk, so, having a chapter (or a prologue) ready before the project is actually created, then
  +
15:20 < cloudii> Can I bring up a point?
  +
15:20 < Lord-Simon> 3
  +
15:20 < Kira0802> go ahead
  +
15:20 <&DarkoNeko> sure
  +
15:20 < Lord-Simon> Let me get some paper
  +
15:20 < cloudii> Theoretically, we want all of our project startup guidelines
  +
15:20 < cloudii> to include rules governing teaser creation
  +
15:20 <&DarkoNeko> I'll go create a summary of the discussion on http://www.baka-tsuki.org/project/index.php?title=Talk:Meeting:March302014&action=edit&redlink=1
  +
15:20 < Vallor> But it is a problem fo alternative langages
  +
15:20 < krytyk> moreover, considering that rule, I want to pick up another facet of it, the teasers
  +
15:20 < krytyk> it is really ambigious considering teaser projects
  +
15:20 < cloudii> exactly
  +
15:21 < Kira0802> Teasers do not have any rule concerning them, and it'd ok.
  +
15:21 < cloudii> That is point 2 on my page
  +
15:21 < Misogi> Coudii mentionned that point later in the post.
  +
15:21 -!- DefaultMelody [[email protected]] has quit [Quit: http://www.mibbit.com ajax IRC Client]
  +
15:21 < Misogi> Cloudii*
  +
15:21 < krytyk> yeah, I mean those issues are connected
  +
15:21 < cloudii> There are no rules whatsoever governing the creation of teasers
  +
15:21 < krytyk> so if you discuss one, you should consider the other at the same time.
  +
15:21 < cloudii> sure
  +
15:21 < cloudii> so, here's the issue with the teasers
  +
15:21 < Misogi> Teaser = A translator only does some chapters, nothing more.
  +
15:22 < cloudii> since there are no rules governing the uploading up them
  +
15:22 < cloudii> and also the fact that some people don't consider teasers to be "starting a new project"
  +
15:22 < cloudii> whereas other people do
  +
15:22 < hayashi> i have a question
  +
15:22 < hayashi> can anyone create a teaser
  +
15:22 < cloudii> go ahead
  +
15:22 < cloudii> yes
  +
15:22 < Kira0802> yes
  +
15:22 < Lord-Simon> yes
  +
15:22 < hayashi> ah ok
  +
15:23 <&DarkoNeko> that may be a problem
  +
15:23 < hayashi> should we restrict it to translators only?
  +
15:23 < Kira0802> it's not
  +
15:23 < stellarroze> even a machine translator?
  +
15:23 <&DarkoNeko> teasers seems to be quite the "bastardised" status
  +
15:23 < Lord-Simon> I would vote for no.
  +
15:23 < krytyk> to create a teaser you need a correctly translated part
  +
15:23 < Kira0802> well, a machine TL can touch a teaser as much as a normal translation
  +
15:23 < krytyk> so not just anyone can do it
  +
15:23 < hayashi> like a series that a translator wants to do but has no time so it's just something he's throwing out there?
  +
15:23 < Misogi> ^
  +
15:23 -!- arczyx [[email protected]] has joined #Baka-Tsuki
  +
15:23 < Kira0802> @Hayashi, yeah, something like that
  +
15:23 < cloudii> Well, it's just my observation that the usage of the "teaser tag" no longer represents what we originally intended for it
  +
15:23 < Lord-Simon> One thing about this whole thing.
  +
15:24 <&DarkoNeko> it probably shoiuld be only a translator, but we would keep away potential new translators if only existing ones can do that
  +
15:24 < krytyk> that might be what some people want to do, but it should be treated as something that "teases" and possibly catches some other translators interest
  +
15:24 < cloudii> All new projects on the wiki are tagged with some sort of teaser tag
  +
15:24 < cloudii> in the English projects
  +
15:24 < cloudii> On the other hand, ATP tag is neglected
  +
15:24 < cloudii> that's the main issue here
  +
15:24 < Misogi> Exception of Alt. Languages.
  +
15:24 < Lord-Simon> One person states the problem and explains it. We wait till he/she is done. Discuss it. And at the end we vote.
  +
15:24 < Lery> What was it intended to be at first?
  +
15:24 < cloudii> Imo, all brand new translations on the wiki, should be tagged with ATP
  +
15:25 < cloudii> Oni's original rules didn't not account for the existence of teasers
  +
15:25 <&DarkoNeko> "ATP" ?
  +
15:25 < hayashi> the initial discussion was about the existence of the 1 week deadline
  +
15:25 < cloudii> "Pending Project Tag"
  +
15:25 < Kira0802> I disagree for that
  +
15:25 < cloudii> http://i.imgur.com/JC6zsLM.png
  +
15:25 < hayashi> so far we seem to be mostly in favour of abolishing it/extending it to a month
  +
15:25 < hayashi> with majority for abolishing it totally
  +
15:25 < Kira0802> Why should something that's not intended to be made into a project have a tag on it?
  +
15:25 <&DarkoNeko> cloudii, ... why does that only apply to "alternative lanugages" ?
  +
15:26 < cloudii> No, it's supposed to apply to all languages
  +
15:26 < cloudii> Oni treats it that way
  +
15:26 <&DarkoNeko> ok
  +
15:26 < cloudii> at the very least
  +
15:26 < krytyk> the problem is with existence of ATP imho
  +
15:26 < cloudii> the problem is, is that ATP is not being used
  +
15:26 < cloudii> for english projects
  +
15:26 <&DarkoNeko> bit of pause again : should we use temporary +M with voicing of the speaker during explanation time ?
  +
15:26 < Kira0802> yes
  +
15:26 < krytyk> as teasers are there, people (incl me) prefer to make a teaser, and once it grows to normal volume size convert it to full project
  +
15:26 < stellarroze> +M?
  +
15:26 < Kira0802> don't forget to voice cloudii
  +
15:26 < krytyk> so abolish ATP or teasers
  +
15:26 < Lord-Simon> yes
  +
15:26 < Lord-Simon> I'd like that to do
  +
15:26 <&DarkoNeko> +m, only voice ad above may talk, it's so only the speaker , well, speak, during that time
  +
15:27 <&DarkoNeko> ok, we'll do that starting the next point then
  +
15:27 < cloudii> Observation: Nowadays, all of our new projects go through the Teaser Project pathway. Regardless of whether a new project really should be classified as a teaser, virtually all translators tag their new project pages with the Teaser tag.
  +
15:27 < cloudii> Translators tag the teaser tag regardless of their intent to continue, or not to continue the project
  +
15:27 < cloudii> that's just an observation
  +
15:27 < krytyk> What about abolishing ATP, and making some of its rules cover the teasers
  +
15:28 < Kira0802> True, but why should all projects have ATP?
  +
15:28 < Kira0802> all teasers*
  +
15:28 <&DarkoNeko> should we make "teaser" an intermediary part of creating a project, then ?
  +
15:28 < krytyk> one week to present a prologue
  +
15:28 < krytyk> as a "teaser"
  +
15:28 < krytyk> teasers are very short so a month is not needed
  +
15:28 < Vallor> teasers and new projects are not the same thing...
  +
15:28 < Kira0802> I say you have the content before making the page for a teaser
  +
15:28 < krytyk> teasers often turn into full project, more often than ATP turn into new projects
  +
15:28 < cloudii> krytyk, the one week thing, is that do you really plan to delete a page that has less than prologue?
  +
15:28 < Kira0802> you must have*
  +
15:29 < Lord-Simon> But the teaser and a new project are treated as one
  +
15:29 < cloudii> If someone uploads 25%, do we really want to delete the page?
  +
15:29 < cloudii> just because it fails to fulfil the 1 week requirement?
  +
15:29 < Lord-Simon> That what it might look to the person out there.
  +
15:29 < hayashi> if I may interrupt
  +
15:29 < cloudii> because that's what the rule implies
  +
15:29 < krytyk> 25%, is 4 lines of text very often
  +
15:29 < Lord-Simon> Go on, hayashi.
  +
15:29 < Kira0802> ehhh
  +
15:29 -!- mode/#baka-tsuki [+v Lord-Simon] by DarkoNeko
  +
15:29 < hayashi> teasers are supposed to entice newbie translators into picking up a project
  +
15:30 -!- mode/#baka-tsuki [-vvv cautr`off Gosha Kanzar] by DarkoNeko
  +
15:30 < hayashi> after being 'teased' by a small portion
  +
15:30 < hayashi> krtyk
  +
15:30 < hayashi> what you're proposing isn't a teaser
  +
15:30 < cloudii> that was the original intention of the teaser initiative
  +
15:30 < hayashi> it's a full project you're committing to
  +
15:30 <+Lord-Simon> Yes, that is correct.
  +
15:30 < hayashi> because you intend to continue
  +
15:30 < krytyk> yeah, I know that. The case is that its mainly teasers that turn into normal projects
  +
15:30 < krytyk> ATP isn't used very often
  +
15:30 < hayashi> so far
  +
15:30 < krytyk> making those rules a problem
  +
15:30 < hayashi> not a lot of teasers have made the leap into full projects
  +
15:31 < Kira0802> Teasers turn into projects because without the tag, they don't get visibility.
  +
15:31 < cloudii> the observation is that everyone uses the teaser tag is an intermediate to full project nowadays
  +
15:31 < cloudii> Here's how I see it:
  +
15:31 < krytyk> thus my point is to merge ATP with teasers and create a separate set of rules.
  +
15:31 < cloudii> add Teaser as an official intermediate in the workflow
  +
15:31 -!- rock96 [[email protected]] has joined #Baka-Tsuki
  +
15:31 < cloudii> or merge/delete ATP tag with teasers
  +
15:31 < Kira0802> long time no see, rock
  +
15:31 < hayashi> I think
  +
15:31 < hayashi> teasers should remain as so
  +
15:31 < rock96> Hi to all, yeah
  +
15:32 < hayashi> but the ATP tag should be moderated/enforced more
  +
15:32 < cloudii> The issue is that, there's no way for the ATP tag to be moderated
  +
15:32 < krytyk> if ATP is moderated, people will just continue as teasers until they qualify to full projects
  +
15:32 < hayashi> if you integrate teasers into the project flow
  +
15:32 < krytyk> thus making ATP oboslete
  +
15:32 < cloudii> because the assumption, currently
  +
15:32 < cloudii> is that all translators claim their uploaded translation is a teaser
  +
15:32 < hayashi> it makes people assume every teaser will become a full project eventually
  +
15:32 < cloudii> rendering ATP unnecessary
  +
15:32 <&DarkoNeko> hayashi, that seems to be the goal of the teasers, tho
  +
15:33 < hayashi> hm
  +
15:33 < cloudii> that's why 2/67 projects in the teaser section have ATP tags
  +
15:33 < Misogi> If I may say a word, I saw some English projects with the ATP tag, to make sure that they end in the sidebar.
  +
15:33 < krytyk> translators try to avoid the regulations
  +
15:33 < Kira0802> I think teasers can stay the way they are. ATP tag should be put only when a project meets requirements to become a full project (Basically, just for the mods to approve the project), and the one-week thing should be deleted
  +
15:33 < hayashi> maybe I didn't phrase myself properly
  +
15:33 < krytyk> you dont fight it with more regulations
  +
15:33 < hayashi> like
  +
15:33 < hayashi> teaser projects should only be tagged as teasers
  +
15:33 < cloudii> So, at the very least, it looks like we're in favor of redefining the ATP tag
  +
15:33 < Lery> Kira0802 +1
  +
15:34 < hayashi> if the translator has no intention of continuing
  +
15:34 < hayashi> because if he does intend to
  +
15:34 < cloudii> I disagree with you hayashi
  +
15:34 <&DarkoNeko> ah, that differentiation
  +
15:34 < hayashi> then it's not really a teaser anymore
  +
15:34 < krytyk> sounds good, so a translator tags the series with ATP, and a mod checks if it qualifies
  +
15:34 < zzhk> the deletion warning is kind of misleading, because projects are sometimes tagged ATP for lacking a registration page
  +
15:34 < cloudii> because the teasers tag is the only way to bring visibility to teasers
  +
15:34 < krytyk> thus teaser + tag = full project (if fulfills the reqs)
  +
15:34 < cloudii> ^that works too
  +
15:35 < Misogi> ^ Yeah, it's not a bad idea.
  +
15:35 < Kira0802> hayashi, the problem is that if you don't tage your series a teaser, you have no visibility in the sidebar
  +
15:35 < cloudii> there are many solutions to this that I think works well
  +
15:35 < cloudii> Kira +1
  +
15:35 < hayashi> aren't we getting rid of the sidebar?
  +
15:35 <+Lord-Simon> That is for later
  +
15:35 <&DarkoNeko> yes.
  +
15:35 <+Lord-Simon> wait
  +
15:35 < cloudii> We're replacing it with links to categories
  +
15:35 <&DarkoNeko> well, changing it
  +
15:35 < cloudii> The only way for any new project to get visibility
  +
15:35 < cloudii> is to either be in the English category
  +
15:35 < cloudii> *English Teaser
  +
15:35 < cloudii> or Light Novel Category
  +
15:36 < cloudii> That's the rationale for most translators to tag teasers
  +
15:36 < cloudii> when their project has not been approved yet
  +
15:36 < hayashi> ok
  +
15:36 < hayashi> but if
  +
15:36 < Kira0802> So a pending project without a teaser tag becomes something like Moku-something Alice
  +
15:36 < hayashi> we are getting rid of the deadline
  +
15:36 < hayashi> translators won't have the need to tag their work as a teaser anymore, right?
  +
15:36 < cloudii> No, they do
  +
15:36 < hayashi> since they won't be under any deadline
  +
15:36 < krytyk> aren't we changing the purpose of atp?
  +
15:36 <+Lord-Simon> Vote yes or no to remove the deadline in the teaser.
  +
15:37 < cloudii> there is no deadline for teaser...
  +
15:37 < cloudii> there's a deadline for ATP
  +
15:37 < krytyk> one sec simon, we discussed more so let's make a more complete conclusion for a vote
  +
15:37 < rock96> ^what he said
  +
15:37 <+Lord-Simon> ATP, sorry.
  +
15:37 < Kira0802> Yea for ATP
  +
15:37 < hayashi> ok
  +
15:37 < hayashi> uh
  +
15:37 <&DarkoNeko> people, it doesn't look like we will arrive to an agreement for the teaser and ATP thing today. I think it would be better for a small group to work on it on the side and then propose it on the forum/another meeting once it's ready
  +
15:37 < hayashi> I'm gonna type out what I think
  +
15:37 < krytyk> no. Cloudii, formulate a statement
  +
15:37 <&DarkoNeko> we're having a good discussion and all, but at this rate we won't have time for any of the other subjects
  +
15:37 < victorrama> True
  +
15:37 < cloudii> um
  +
15:38 < hayashi> teasers should be kept as teasers, but the atp deadline should be removed so that future translators have more flexibility
  +
15:38 < hayashi> does that make sense?
  +
15:38 < cloudii> We should remove the 1 week deadline for ATP
  +
15:38 < Kira0802> yes, hayashi
  +
15:38 < cloudii> require ATP to be tagged with all new project pages
  +
15:38 < Vallor> Are you saying that teasers and new projects are the same thing? New projects should be in the LN category and teasers in a teaser category, that's all.
  +
15:38 < cloudii> including Teaser pages
  +
15:38 < cloudii> so the purpose of ATP
  +
15:38 < cloudii> is for a mod to check the page
  +
15:38 < hayashi> oh I'm saying teasers are seperate from new projects
  +
15:38 < hayashi> any new project will have to be to tagged with ATP
  +
15:38 < cloudii> but if the page is satisfactory, ATP can be removed
  +
15:38 < hayashi> ^
  +
15:38 < cloudii> the teaser tag is kept
  +
15:38 < cloudii> that's my proposal
  +
15:38 < krytyk> mm, ATP for all projects that have at least 1 chapter not including prologue. And then the ATP pages are to be judged by a mod.
  +
15:39 < krytyk> isnt that better cloudi
  +
15:39 < Kira0802> @Vallor Pending approval are reffered as New projects here, vallor
  +
15:39 < Lery> Actually the teaser tag should mean that it was translated just for fun and it's there to be discovered but that nobody is currently working further on it, isn't it ?
  +
15:39 < cloudii> krytyk's suggestion is also satisfactory
  +
15:39 < Vallor> ATP should be removed, or be added on new projects only. Teaser shouldn't have to be tagged as pending approval...
  +
15:39 < cloudii> @Lery, that was the original definition, but practically that isn't the case anymore
  +
15:39 < Kira0802> @Vallor or rather, those that are created but don't meet the requirements
  +
15:39 < krytyk> thus teasers be teasers and can have just prologue, and ATP is a sign for mod to judge a series.
  +
15:39 < krytyk> that wants to become a full project.
  +
15:39 < cloudii> krytyk's proposal I'm in favor with as well
  +
15:40 < Lery> @cloudii Well, isn't it because of that time limit we're wanting to remove ?
  +
15:40 < hayashi> I'm ok with that
  +
15:40 < cloudii> I would like to remove the time limit as well
  +
15:40 < krytyk> the time limit is unneccesary then
  +
15:40 < cloudii> Someone with supervisor access needs to rewrite the entire tag
  +
15:40 < krytyk> as it already has 1 chapter when the tag is put on.
  +
15:40 < Misogi> May someone clarify the changes and launch the vote?
  +
15:40 < cloudii> http://i.imgur.com/JC6zsLM.png
  +
15:40 < Kira0802> OK, so remove time limit, use tag just for upgrade.
  +
15:40 < Kira0802> Teasers stay teasers.
  +
15:40 < hayashi> sounds good
  +
15:40 < cloudii> 1). Teaser tag is the default tag to be put on new project
  +
15:40 < krytyk> yup
  +
15:41 < cloudii> 2). When the teaser reaches the requirements for full project, translator tags Pending
  +
15:41 < cloudii> 3). Oni/DarkoNeko/Vaelis approve
  +
15:41 < cloudii> that's it
  +
15:41 <+Lord-Simon> yes
  +
15:41 <+Lord-Simon> Or any other Supervisor
  +
15:41 < krytyk> simplifies a ton, and no hanging pending projects in a separate category.
  +
15:41 < cloudii> Can we vote to agree?
  +
15:41 < Kira0802> OK
  +
15:41 < hayashi> simon call for a vote?
  +
15:41 < Misogi> May I add something?
  +
15:42 <+Lord-Simon> We are now voting for cloudii's summary
  +
15:42 < Vallor> By full project, you mean a series completely translated?
  +
15:42 <&DarkoNeko> no
  +
15:42 <+Lord-Simon> Vote yes if you agree, no if you disagree
  +
15:42 < cloudii> full project, meaning like "sidebar project"
  +
15:42 < Kira0802> No, a full project=project in the sidebar
  +
15:42 <&DarkoNeko> okay, please repeat exact what we are voting for, cloudii
  +
15:42 < Vallor> Okay, so I'm agree
  +
15:42 < cloudii> : 1). Teaser tag is the default tag to be put on new project
  +
15:42 <&DarkoNeko> then everyone vote
  +
15:42 < cloudii> : 2). When the teaser reaches the requirements for full project, translator tags Pending
  +
15:42 < cloudii> 3). Oni/DarkoNeko/Vaelis approve
  +
15:42 < cloudii> (or some supervisor)
  +
15:43 <+Lord-Simon> Vote yes or no
  +
15:43 < Kira0802> Yea
  +
15:43 < cloudii> Yes
  +
15:43 < Cthaeh> yes
  +
15:43 < krytyk> yes
  +
15:43 < rock96> Yep
  +
15:43 < hayashi> yes
  +
15:43 < stellarroze> yes
  +
15:43 <+Lord-Simon> if you vote no, explain yourself after the vote
  +
15:43 < Code-Zero> yes
  +
15:43 < Vallor> Yes but what's happened to the deadline?
  +
15:43 < Misogi> Yes (although the Alt. Languages situation should be clarified).
  +
15:43 < hayashi> it will be gone
  +
15:43 < cloudii> We'll discuss that next
  +
15:43 <&DarkoNeko> removed
  +
15:43 <+Lord-Simon> Deadlinewill beremoved
  +
15:43 < cloudii> Okay
  +
15:43 < cloudii> that works too
  +
15:43 < cloudii> <3
  +
15:43 <&DarkoNeko> yes
  +
15:43 -!- Nurin [[email protected]] has joined #Baka-Tsuki
  +
15:43 <&DarkoNeko> well, the point 3 is a bit of pickle, but it seems glboally good
  +
15:43 < Lery> yes
  +
15:43 < krytyk> deadline is removed, as the tag is only to be put after 1 chapter (prologue aside) is to be already finished.
  +
15:44 < Lery> Any supervisor can handle point 3 I thinl
  +
15:44 < cloudii> Onto next point?
  +
15:44 < Lery> Any supervisor can handle point 3 I think*
  +
15:44 <+Lord-Simon> yes
  +
15:44 < Vallor> thAgree with Lery
  +
15:44 < cloudii> Point 3 is like this now, because only those individuals ahve sidebar access
  +
15:44 < Vallor> Agree*
  +
15:44 < Kira0802> ^
  +
15:44 < cloudii> but if we lose the sidebar, I'm in favor for any supervisor approval
  +
15:44 < Lery> @Cloudii, let's go. Shouldn't we talk about sidebar modification ?
  +
15:44 < Kira0802> it's not anyone who can put projects on the sidebar atm
  +
15:44 < zzhk> so for substandard projects (e.g. no translated content), the deletion template (http://www.baka-tsuki.org/project/index.php?title=Category:Speedy_Deletion) will be slapped on instead of ATP﹖
  +
15:45 < cloudii> Thank you zzhk, I agree with that too
  +
15:45 < Misogi> There's the exception of Alt. Lang., where supervisors handle that.
  +
15:45 <&DarkoNeko> should't it be normal deletion, ratehr than speedy ? actually, do we have a normal deletion process ?
  +
15:45 < hayashi> I'm good with that
  +
15:45 <&DarkoNeko> http://www.baka-tsuki.org/project/index.php?title=Talk:Meeting:March302014#teaser_status_.2F_ATP alright, it's written down
  +
15:45 < cloudii> Also, can we assign someone
  +
15:45 <+Lord-Simon> No we don'T
  +
15:45 < hayashi> deleting without warning
  +
15:45 < cloudii> to rewrite this:
  +
15:45 < cloudii> http://i.imgur.com/JC6zsLM.png
  +
15:45 < cloudii> It's protected
  +
15:45 < hayashi> might be vandalism
  +
15:45 <+Lord-Simon> we should discuss the deletion process
  +
15:45 < Kira0802> Darko can
  +
15:45 < hayashi> or not give the guy a fair chance to upload stuff
  +
15:45 <+Lord-Simon> but that is later for the forum
  +
15:46 <&DarkoNeko> we'll do the deed later
  +
15:46 < Kira0802> nxt point?
  +
15:46 < victorrama> Yes
  +
15:46 < cloudii> Okay
  +
15:46 <&DarkoNeko> alright. What is the next point, then ?
  +
15:46 < cloudii> Point 3
  +
15:46 < cloudii> There are number of instances int he rules
  +
15:46 < cloudii> that require members to "email" supervisors
  +
15:46 < cloudii> .......
  +
15:46 < hayashi> this is a related point
  +
15:46 < cloudii> Remove all references thereof
  +
15:46 < hayashi> but a lot of the supervisors listed are no longer active
  +
15:46 <+Lord-Simon> yes, looks like it
  +
15:46 < cloudii> of that form of contact
  +
15:47 < Misogi> I agree on making a single page for contact.
  +
15:47 <+Lord-Simon> but if we look at the discussion before
  +
15:47 < krytyk> either forums, direct (irc) contact, or PM
  +
15:47 <+Lord-Simon> we can remove that part
  +
15:47 < Kira0802> Darko
  +
15:47 < zzhk> speaking of "supervisors", we should prioritize the issue of wiki supervisor protection rights
  +
15:47 <&DarkoNeko> let's do it properly people
  +
15:47 <+Lord-Simon> as any supervisor will go through newly created project
  +
15:47 <+Lord-Simon> if they have the tags
  +
15:47 <&DarkoNeko> Lord-Simon, starting the vote ? there's not much to discuss here XD
  +
15:47 < cloudii> Actually, I really want to echo zzhk here (if DarkoNeko is capable of doing anything abou tit)
  +
15:47 <+Lord-Simon> Wait
  +
15:48 < Vallor> Misogi is right. A single page of contact is good enough.
  +
15:48 <+Lord-Simon> We are talking about a mail-list creating
  +
15:48 <+Lord-Simon> *creation.
  +
15:48 < cloudii> Um, acutally yeah
  +
15:48 <&DarkoNeko> argh, what
  +
15:48 <+Lord-Simon> mailing list
  +
15:48 < cloudii> DarkoNeko I neglected to explain half of my thing
  +
15:48 <&DarkoNeko> I don't want that, i hate mails
  +
15:48 < Lery> @zzhk, we're waiting for TLG before talking about those administrative problems ;)
  +
15:48 < cloudii> so, the issue is
  +
15:48 <&DarkoNeko> no way i'm getting on another mailing list
  +
15:48 < cloudii> currently members are told to contact "A supervisor"
  +
15:48 < cloudii> preferably all of them
  +
15:48 < cloudii> but we all know that they usually only contact one
  +
15:49 < cloudii> but if a translator looking for project approval
  +
15:49 <+Lord-Simon> That's why a mailing list
  +
15:49 < cloudii> posts on TLG's talk page
  +
15:49 < cloudii> clearly it's not going to get lookd at
  +
15:49 <+Lord-Simon> or one mail, that sens to many
  +
15:49 < Misogi> "Create a single location on the Wiki where administrative requests can be made.", as Cloudii wrote in his topic.
  +
15:49 < Kira0802> Can we just create a page on the Wiki for "Requests" or something?
  +
15:49 < Lery> Yeah, that's a major problem.
  +
15:49 <&DarkoNeko> no no no
  +
15:49 <&DarkoNeko> not a mailing list.
  +
15:49 <+Lord-Simon> What else ?
  +
15:49 < cloudii> If we have no mailing list, it's okay too
  +
15:50 < Lery> We could either use a topic on the forum for that purpose, or a dedicated Wiki page, couldn't we ?
  +
15:50 < Kira0802> So a wiki page?
  +
15:50 <&DarkoNeko> especially when we can just have a maintenance page dedicated to that on the wiki
  +
15:50 < cloudii> "Create a single location on the Wiki where administrative requests can be made."
  +
15:50 < Lery> Or even both
  +
15:50 < cloudii> That's the proposal
  +
15:50 <&DarkoNeko> yes, like a wikipedia's request for deletion, for maintenance, for adminship etc
  +
15:50 < Kira0802> Then...we settle for a wiki page?
  +
15:50 < rock96> um, what about simply forwarding people to the forum directly to make a thread?
  +
15:50 < cloudii> Registration issues with forums
  +
15:50 < cloudii> captcha
  +
15:50 < hayashi> forum wiki integration is a seprate issue
  +
15:50 <&DarkoNeko> the more things directly on the wiki the better
  +
15:50 < cloudii> "Create a single location on the Wiki where administrative requests can be made."
  +
15:50 < Lery> I think that we could go with both : one wiki page for wiki addicts and one forum page for forum addicts...
  +
15:50 < cloudii> Anyone against this?
  +
15:50 <+Lord-Simon> no
  +
15:50 < Kira0802> No
  +
15:50 <&DarkoNeko> no
  +
15:51 <+Lord-Simon> two instances is bad
  +
15:51 < Vallor> A 'Link here the project you would like to be approved' wiki page
  +
15:51 < rock96> guests are allowed to make posts. And we're lurking around approving posts...
  +
15:51 < Misogi> May I add something?
  +
15:51 <+Lord-Simon> really bad
  +
15:51 <+Lord-Simon> yes
  +
15:51 < Kira0802> misogi, just say something lol, don't ask
  +
15:51 < krytyk> Vallor, we already have decided ATP tag for that
  +
15:51 < cloudii> ^^
  +
15:51 < Lery> @Lord-Simon, I don't think so : there are as much supervisor on the forum as on the wiki...
  +
15:51 < Misogi> We should divide it into sections (languages, approval...), and delete regularly the things once they're done.
  +
15:51 < Vallor> krytyk: Isn't it exactly the same issue? I'm lost...
  +
15:51 < krytyk> its not
  +
15:52 < victorrama> Most suoervisors do nothing
  +
15:52 < cloudii> "Assign an individual to clean that page of off-topic and resolved material. "
  +
15:52 <&DarkoNeko> Lery, can't be, I mean, i don't have a forum account
  +
15:52 < krytyk> we're speaking about sueprvisors-only things to do
  +
15:52 -!- mib_cfp1sj [[email protected]] has quit [Quit: http://www.mibbit.com ajax IRC Client]
  +
15:52 < cloudii> Yes Misogi <3
  +
15:52 < Misogi> Then I'm on the idea. Summary?
  +
15:52 < krytyk> Protecting pages a prime example.
  +
15:52 < cloudii> Yup
  +
15:52 < cloudii> 1). Create a single location on the Wiki where administrative requests can be made. This should be at location that all sysops/supervisors monitor.
  +
15:52 < Misogi> Protection -> Yes.
  +
15:52 < cloudii> 2). Assign an individual to clean that page of off-topic and resolved material. (I'll even volunteer myself if no one wants to do it).
  +
15:52 < cloudii> That's it
  +
15:52 < Kira0802> Yea
  +
15:53 <&DarkoNeko> the point 2 is a problem
  +
15:53 < Lery> @DarkoNeko : it's not a problem, you'll handle the wiki request and the supervisors with forum account will handle the forum's ones...
  +
15:53 < krytyk> the same person who grants the requests should delete it
  +
15:53 < Misogi> ^
  +
15:53 <+Lord-Simon> ^
  +
15:53 < cloudii> That's fair too <3
  +
15:53 <&DarkoNeko> krytyk, that, yes
  +
15:53 <+Lord-Simon> 1). Create a single location on the Wiki where administrative requests can be made. This should be at location that all sysops/supervisors monitor.
  +
15:53 <&DarkoNeko> but for other stuff, having a pool of people rather than "an individual" is better
  +
15:53 < Vallor> I'm agree with krytyk
  +
15:54 < cloudii> Sure, my wording was bad. My intent was just to say that the page needs to get cleaned
  +
15:54 -!- BrokenTree [[email protected]] has joined #Baka-Tsuki
  +
15:54 < Misogi> "I agree", Vallor.
  +
15:54 < Lery> Having only one individual is always bad, we never know what may happen.
  +
15:54 <+Lord-Simon> 2). Any supervisor that grants the ok to a request will delete the request.
  +
15:54 <+Lord-Simon> *an ok
  +
15:54 < cloudii> Motion for Simon's proposal?
  +
15:54 < Vallor> Misogi: Sorry, I always make this mistake...
  +
15:54 <&DarkoNeko> Lord-Simon, that's pretty much a given
  +
15:54 <+Lord-Simon> yes
  +
15:54 < Misogi> Yes.
  +
15:54 < cloudii> yes
  +
15:54 < Kira0802> Yea
  +
15:54 < rock96> Yes.
  +
15:54 <&DarkoNeko> agreed
  +
15:54 < krytyk> y
  +
15:55 < Lery> yes
  +
15:55 < cloudii> Motion accepted… apparently?
  +
15:55 <+Lord-Simon> YEs
  +
15:55 <+Lord-Simon> it is accepted
  +
15:55 < hayashi> yes
  +
15:55 < Kira0802> Indeed...next point?
  +
15:55 <+Lord-Simon> ^
  +
15:55 < cloudii> Okay, I'm going to skip Point 4 on my outline
  +
15:55 <+Lord-Simon> wait
  +
15:55 -!- victorrama [[email protected]] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
  +
15:55 < cloudii> that'll take too much time
  +
15:55 <+Lord-Simon> just tell about point 4
  +
15:55 <+Lord-Simon> for information
  +
15:55 < Kira0802> ^
  +
15:56 < cloudii> It's a bunch of topics that I suggested that we create rules for
  +
15:56 < Kira0802> err
  +
15:56 < Misogi> Since you gave the things to add...
  +
15:56 < cloudii> for example, the Wiki lacks general behavior rules
  +
15:56 -!- masoatwork [[email protected]] has joined #Baka-Tsuki
  +
15:56 -!- masoatwork is now known as victorrama
  +
15:56 < cloudii> Or well,
  +
15:56 < Kira0802> let's move that to the forums then?
  +
15:56 <&DarkoNeko> "don't be a dick or we'll ban you"
  +
15:56 < cloudii> Well, do people want to discuss this?
  +
15:56 < hayashi> no
  +
15:56 < Misogi> No need.
  +
15:56 < Kira0802> no
  +
15:56 <&DarkoNeko> nah, let's skip
  +
15:56 <+Lord-Simon> not here
  +
15:56 < cloudii> Fair
  +
15:56 <+Lord-Simon> not now
  +
15:56 < cloudii> Part 2: Migrate all the Wiki rules from the Forums, and archive the old rules.
  +
15:57 < Misogi> Er, you forgot #5
  +
15:57 <+Lord-Simon> Hmmm....
  +
15:57 < Lery> We can discuss it later on the forum, Cloudii
  +
15:57 <+Lord-Simon> I would disagree.
  +
15:57 < cloudii> Oh. Actually, imo, it's unecessary if sidebar gets scrapped
  +
15:57 < cloudii> (point 5 thatis)
  +
15:57 <&DarkoNeko> I never was fond of having anything like that on the forum
  +
15:57 <&DarkoNeko> a wiki reader won't go there to look for rules
  +
15:57 < cloudii> Simon, can you explain why you disagree?
  +
15:57 < Kira0802> Forums rule to the Wiki or Wiki Rules in the forum to the WIki?
  +
15:57 <+Lord-Simon> We can have two identical versions on forums and on the wiki
  +
15:57 < Kira0802> there's a difference here
  +
15:57 -!- BrokenTree [[email protected]] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
  +
15:58 < cloudii> Forum rules on forums, Wiki rules on Wiki
  +
15:58 < cloudii> remove Wiki rules on forums
  +
15:58 < Lery> Yeah that should be so.
  +
15:58 <+Lord-Simon> Ah
  +
15:58 <+Lord-Simon> yes
  +
15:58 < Kira0802> Yea
  +
15:58 <&DarkoNeko> hmm, then putting a link to the wiki page on the forum
  +
15:58 < Vallor> agreed
  +
15:58 <+Lord-Simon> That explains it.
  +
15:58 < cloudii> Yes, DarkoNeko
  +
15:58 < Misogi> ^
  +
15:58 < Cthaeh> yes
  +
15:58 < krytyk> I suggest we discuss mechanics first, behavioural rules other day
  +
15:58 < Lery> yes
  +
15:58 <+Lord-Simon> So, I guess we don't even need to vote.
  +
15:59 < victorrama> ^
  +
15:59 < cloudii> Sure
  +
15:59 < cloudii> http://www.baka-tsuki.org/project/index.php?title=Baka-Tsuki:Rules
  +
15:59 < cloudii> DarkoNeko, could you move the rules here?
  +
15:59 < cloudii> and then link this onto the sidebar?
  +
15:59 < Lery> That's mechanic ^^ It's about rules' location, not about the rules themselves.
  +
15:59 <&DarkoNeko> ask me again after the meeting
  +
15:59 < cloudii> Sure
  +
15:59 <&DarkoNeko> I'm not doing anything until we finished
  +
15:59 < Misogi> Don't forget to put a link on the Main Page.
  +
15:59 < Lery> Aren't you already taking the minutes ?
  +
15:59 < cloudii> Last
  +
15:59 < cloudii> Part 3: Create comprehensive Help Pages to improve the experience of brand-new members.
  +
15:59 < cloudii> I just want official recognition for this
  +
16:00 <&DarkoNeko> Lery, loosely, i'm only putting the votes
  +
16:00 < cloudii> no writing being done here....
  +
16:00 < krytyk> Not really an issue we need to discuss IMHO.
  +
16:00 < Lery> I guess your multitasking has limits '^^
  +
16:00 <&DarkoNeko> I'll try whoever is keeping logs to make a better version later
  +
16:00 < cloudii> Can we get official recognition for the support of creating help pages?
  +
16:00 < Lery> You have my approval Cloudii
  +
16:00 < cloudii> yes/no
  +
16:00 <+Lord-Simon> If I remember right, cloudii, you have made a page for that
  +
16:00 < krytyk> well, yes
  +
16:00 < Lery> Go ahead make us nice help pages ^^
  +
16:00 <&DarkoNeko> ...does this REALLY need to be voted ? it seems like a given
  +
16:00 <+Lord-Simon> ^
  +
16:00 < Kira0802> Yea
  +
16:00 < cloudii> I've never gotten direct approval from anyone… so....
  +
16:00 < krytyk> thats what i said;
  +
16:00 <&DarkoNeko> the dissent would be on what to put exactly on pages
  +
16:00 <+Lord-Simon> just add it to the list that will be done
  +
16:01 < cloudii> Cool, okay, that covers everything from my end
  +
16:01 < Misogi> There's also the problem of visibility.
  +
16:01 < Lery> yeah, if you had taken initiative to do it on your own, nobody would have complained ;)
  +
16:01 -!- Code-Zero [[email protected]] has quit [Quit: Rizon webchat: http://qchat.rizon.net/]
  +
16:01 -!- wet [[email protected]] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
  +
16:01 <&DarkoNeko> cloudii, on a wiki, if you wait for approvals nothing ever gets done
  +
16:01 < Misogi> Sure, there are rules, but if you can't find them easily...
  +
16:01 <+Lord-Simon> Gonna mail TLG
  +
16:01 <+Lord-Simon> *sigh*
  +
16:02 < Kira0802> we'll just post there on the sidebar/main page, misogi
  +
16:02 < Lery> Yeah, those help pages should be located so that you find them easily.
  +
16:02 < krytyk> where does he live, lets raid him;
  +
16:02 -!- xiiao [[email protected]] has quit []
  +
16:02 < Misogi> Should be sleeping.
  +
16:02 < Kira0802> i saw his phone number
  +
16:02 < Lery> Ahahah, he's on the west cost, isn't he ?
  +
16:02 < Kira0802> wanna call him?
  +
16:02 <&DarkoNeko> let him sleep
  +
16:02 < rock96> ...huh?
  +
16:02 < Lery> Anybody has him on skype ?
  +
16:03 < Kira0802> lolno
  +
16:03 <&DarkoNeko> better no TLG than a very pissed TLG ^^;
  +
16:03 < cloudii> I suppose this meeting will get rescheduled for another day for the other adminstrative stuff
  +
16:03 < krytyk> though its going to be a pain if he turns out after everyone leaves
  +
16:03 < hayashi> should take the time to settle the stuff that doesn't need tlg
  +
16:03 <&DarkoNeko> well, i have a few points, but we already had discussed them on a smaller group and partially implemented them (until i got too busy ^^;)
  +
16:03 <+Lord-Simon> no
  +
16:03 <+Lord-Simon> I will be here
  +
16:03 <+Lord-Simon> for the next few hours
  +
16:04 <+Lord-Simon> I can look out for him
  +
16:04 < cloudii> "Wrong link leading to the wiki's Copyrights page."
  +
16:04 < cloudii> DarkoNeko can do that, right? 8D
  +
16:04 < Kira0802> we'll just vote on issues and ask TLG to approve, and the decision belongs to him
  +
16:04 <&DarkoNeko> yeah, that has little to do with TLG lol
  +
16:04 < cloudii> We could do what Kira said too
  +
16:04 <+Lord-Simon> ah
  +
16:04 < Lery> Yeah, that's jsut a
  +
16:04 < Lery> Yeah, that's just a ".net" at the bad place
  +
16:04 < Misogi> Not really.
  +
16:05 -!- wet [[email protected]] has joined #Baka-Tsuki
  +
16:05 <&DarkoNeko> yes, details of link change later, please
  +
16:05 <+Lord-Simon> @DarkoNeko, do you have access to the blog ?
  +
16:05 < cloudii> DarkoNeko, as a wiki sysop, can you assign usergroups powers or is that no?
  +
16:05 < Misogi> Already written?
  +
16:05 <+Lord-Simon> Of B-T ?
  +
16:05 < Misogi> .*
  +
16:05 <&DarkoNeko> cloudii, I can assign people to select groups, but I cannot create new groups
  +
16:05 -!- kry [[email protected]] has joined #Baka-Tsuki
  +
16:06 <&DarkoNeko> Lord-Simon, not tha tI know of
  +
16:06 < cloudii> Thanks, so you can't help us xD
  +
16:06 < cloudii> Let's go to groups reorganization
  +
16:06 < cloudii> rename exactly who to remove off the groups
  +
16:06 < cloudii> and who to put on
  +
16:06 < Lery> @Lord-Simon : I think Kira0802 has access to the blog...
  +
16:06 < hayashi> that's more for forums, right?
  +
16:06 < Misogi> Inactive members, that's a given.
  +
16:06 <&DarkoNeko> defining inactivity. is that "over a year" ?
  +
16:06 < Misogi> I'd rather say 6 months.
  +
16:06 <+Lord-Simon> So, we are now discussing the Users of certain groups
  +
16:06 < kry> its "ever since forever"
  +
16:06 <&DarkoNeko> and condition for them to get the right back if they come back, as well
  +
16:06 < cloudii> We're also talking about forum usergroups
  +
16:07 <+Lord-Simon> and the rearrangement ?
  +
16:07 <&DarkoNeko> eh, do that on the forum, I'm only interested in the wiki :D
  +
16:07 < zzhk> I think DarkoNeko misunderstood cloudii's question on wiki user groups, rather than creating new groups﹐ can you modify a group's powers?
  +
16:07 < cloudii> brb
  +
16:07 -!- krytyk [[email protected]] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
  +
16:07 < Misogi> Well, remove all inactive members from all groups.
  +
16:07 < Lery> Why remove them ? Just add new people if old people go MIA
  +
16:07 -!- kry is now known as krytyk
  +
16:07 < Misogi> In case they get hacked.
  +
16:08 < Misogi> That's a decent reason.
  +
16:08 < Vallor> Inactive members -> people who didn't posted any work since 6 months at least, or people we don't have news since a while?
  +
16:08 <&DarkoNeko> zzhk, not that I know of
  +
16:08 < Lery> Well, from that POV, I think it's true the more people with rights, the more risks we have that someone get hacked.
  +
16:08 <&DarkoNeko> Lery, it's so people don't ask inactive to do things
  +
16:08 <+Lord-Simon> Well, I can edit Digital Editors, Project Editors and tsukaima legion
  +
16:08 <&DarkoNeko> but yeah, there's also the hacking possibility
  +
16:09 <+Lord-Simon> well
  +
16:09 <&DarkoNeko> hmm
  +
16:09 < krytyk> wait. separate wiki and forums issues
  +
16:09 <&DarkoNeko> anyway, let's simplify the motion for now.
  +
16:09 < krytyk> now we are talking about wiki
  +
16:09 < rock96> Judging by what I've seen, no need to discuss Tsukaima Legion
  +
16:09 < zzhk> is there any incentive to hack B-T wiki accounts, however?
  +
16:09 < krytyk> forums later.
  +
16:09 < Lery> @Lord-Simon : isn't that on the forum ?
  +
16:09 <+Lord-Simon> yes
  +
16:09 < Lery> ok
  +
16:09 <+Lord-Simon> are we talking about the wiki ?
  +
16:09 <&DarkoNeko> zzhk, the same as hacking wikiepdia admin account, but people do
  +
16:09 < Misogi> A spammer with a hacked account will cause more damage.
  +
16:10 < Lery> Are we discussing about forum's groups or wiki's currently ?
  +
16:10 < Misogi> Wiki.
  +
16:10 < Misogi> Forum is kept for TLG.
  +
16:10 < Vallor> Misogi: A ban wouldn't be enough?
  +
16:10 < cloudii> I see no particular reason to remove inactive Wiki supervisors, if we have a single location for placing administrative requests
  +
16:10 < Misogi> You have to clean up the mess.
  +
16:10 < Lery> Actually Oni has the needed rights to do the needed modifications on the forum...
  +
16:11 < Kira0802> cloudii is right
  +
16:11 <&DarkoNeko> I feel we should have a minimum activity setting for removal, nonetheless. even if it's a long long time
  +
16:11 < Vallor> Misogi: You just have to delete all the recent changes...
  +
16:11 < hayashi> it's more for decluttering
  +
16:11 <+Lord-Simon> well, there is the http://www.baka-tsuki.org/project/index.php?title=Special:ActiveUsers
  +
16:11 <+Lord-Simon> but it's limited to the last 30 days
  +
16:11 < cloudii> that's one month activity
  +
16:11 < Vallor> remove*
  +
16:11 < cloudii> I was just reminded of something....
  +
16:12 < cloudii> Do we have protocol for dealing with inactive project supervisors?
  +
16:12 < hayashi> nope
  +
16:12 < Kira0802> no
  +
16:12 <&DarkoNeko> none
  +
16:12 <+Lord-Simon> No
  +
16:12 < cloudii> okay, do we want protocol?
  +
16:12 <&DarkoNeko> I do
  +
16:12 <+Lord-Simon> Yes
  +
16:12 -!- victorrama [[email protected]] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
  +
16:12 < Kira0802> RIP Nera. ;_;
  +
16:12 < cloudii> Okay, I'll propose something on the spot
  +
16:12 <+Lord-Simon> Protocol is always good
  +
16:12 <&DarkoNeko> since there wil lbe dissent on the exact duration, we should take the longest for now
  +
16:12 < cloudii> 6 months inactivity is definition for inactvity
  +
16:13 < rock96> all hail commie wiki
  +
16:13 < cloudii> Someone who would like the position
  +
16:13 <&DarkoNeko> I propose that anyone with over a year of inactivity will lose his right
  +
16:13 < cloudii> should contact a Wiki Supervisor
  +
16:13 < cloudii> The Wiki Supervisor
  +
16:13 <+Lord-Simon> hello
  +
16:13 < cloudii> can judge whether the Project Supervisor
  +
16:13 < cloudii> should be replaced
  +
16:13 <+Lord-Simon> or sysop ?
  +
16:13 < Kira0802> kk
  +
16:13 < cloudii> the end
  +
16:13 <&DarkoNeko> and that, should they come back withing a year after that, could regain those rights on simple demand
  +
16:13 < Vallor> cloudii: what's your definition of 'inactivity'?
  +
16:13 < cloudii> Hmm...
  +
16:13 <&DarkoNeko> no action on wiki
  +
16:13 <&DarkoNeko> none at all
  +
16:14 < cloudii> I think that, anyone should be able to place a request
  +
16:14 < hayashi> what's the current setting anyway
  +
16:14 < cloudii> to be instated over an apparent Project Supervisor
  +
16:14 < hayashi> the project super defaults to the head translator?
  +
16:14 < cloudii> but for reference of the Administration
  +
16:14 <&DarkoNeko> cloudii, you're kinda assumed we have a limited number of seats
  +
16:14 < Kira0802> no action, no sign of presence, no demand of absence
  +
16:14 <&DarkoNeko> -ed+ing
  +
16:14 <+Lord-Simon> brb
  +
16:14 < cloudii> @hayashi, nothing. There name just stays there.
  +
16:15 < hayashi> the 2nd thing is
  +
16:15 < hayashi> what rights do project supers have
  +
16:15 < cloudii> All rights with regards to the project...
  +
16:15 < cloudii> which is a lot
  +
16:15 < Vallor> Kira0802: No sign of presence on the wiki or on the forum too?
  +
16:15 < Kira0802> yeah
  +
16:15 < Kira0802> boh
  +
16:15 < cloudii> For example: "British English vs American English, etc"
  +
16:16 < Vallor> Kira0802: ok, thx
  +
16:16 < cloudii> Okay, so we can just say:
  +
16:16 <&DarkoNeko> uh, so, we include the forum ? meh
  +
16:16 < cloudii> 1) If a Project Supervisor has no sign of presence on the wiki or on the forum too, a translator can request to become to new project supervisor
  +
16:16 <+Lord-Simon> Darko
  +
16:16 <&DarkoNeko> me
  +
16:16 <+Lord-Simon> Go create an account
  +
16:16 <&DarkoNeko> no.
  +
16:16 <+Lord-Simon> I'll answer the question
  +
16:16 <+Lord-Simon> GO
  +
16:17 < Kira0802> on the wiki and on the forums*, cloudii
  +
16:17 < hayashi> lol
  +
16:17 <&DarkoNeko> i have nothing to do there
  +
16:17 < hayashi> neko
  +
16:17 < Kira0802> oh wait
  +
16:17 < Kira0802> misread
  +
16:17 < Kira0802> w/e
  +
16:17 < cloudii> (I just copy pasted) lol
  +
16:17 <&DarkoNeko> for me, there is only the wiki, and IRC
  +
16:17 <+Lord-Simon> damn cat
  +
16:17 <+Lord-Simon> what if I give you an acc ?
  +
16:17 <&DarkoNeko> wikipedia ain't need no stinking forums
  +
16:17 <&DarkoNeko> no.
  +
16:17 < Vallor> If you're active on the wiki, that's enough.
  +
16:17 <&DarkoNeko> I won't use it. I don't have time to read forums
  +
16:18 < Kira0802> No sign of presence means no one has seen you
  +
16:18 < Kira0802> this includes forums and wiki
  +
16:18 < cloudii> Forum & Wiki or Wiki Only?
  +
16:18 <&DarkoNeko> well, before that, let's do a more genera thing
  +
16:18 < cloudii> vote
  +
16:18 <&DarkoNeko> no, no, no, that's too precise
  +
16:18 < Kira0802> Forum & Wiki
  +
16:18 < cloudii> DarkoNeko explain?
  +
16:18 < Vallor> I'd add social networks/mails as well...
  +
16:18 <&DarkoNeko> so, starting with basics :
  +
16:19 < Kira0802> If a supervisor's not there on the wiki and just on the forums, you can throw a PM at him
  +
16:19 <&DarkoNeko> cloudii, we were talking about inactivity in general, now you're on proejcts supervisors on particular
  +
16:19 < cloudii> project supervisors in general
  +
16:19 < cloudii> in this instance
  +
16:19 < cloudii> because there's only one position for it
  +
16:19 <&DarkoNeko> "anyone with over a year of inactivity will lose his rights on the wiki."
  +
16:19 < cloudii> Are we voting?
  +
16:19 <+Lord-Simon> as a project supervisors
  +
16:19 <+Lord-Simon> *r
  +
16:20 < Kira0802> project admins/supervisors
  +
16:20 <+Lord-Simon> Hmm...
  +
16:20 <&DarkoNeko> do project supervisors have physical rights ?
  +
16:20 < Kira0802> a random editor doesn't need to have his rights revoked, since we don't care
  +
16:20 <&DarkoNeko> I'm talking about wiki groups ^^;
  +
16:20 < Kira0802> project editors can lock pages
  +
16:20 < cloudii> @DarkoNeko. There is no project supervisor wiki group
  +
16:20 < Kira0802> supervisors*
  +
16:20 <&DarkoNeko> then they're on a particular group
  +
16:20 < Kira0802> @cloudii there is
  +
16:20 < Kira0802> well
  +
16:20 < cloudii> there's a wiki supervisor group
  +
16:20 < Kira0802> just "supervisor" though
  +
16:21 <&DarkoNeko> let's do that on a few sets, then. 1) general activity 2) specifically for project supervisor replacement ?
  +
16:21 < cloudii> yes, and we've taken tht�at to mean "Adminstration"
  +
16:21 < Lery> Actually a lot of Project Supervisor aren't even Wiki Supervisors...
  +
16:21 < cloudii> ^^
  +
16:21 < Kira0802> that's not intended
  +
16:21 < Kira0802> though.
  +
16:21 <&DarkoNeko> all the more reason to have 2 separate motions
  +
16:21 < cloudii> Can we start with DarkoNeko's motion?
  +
16:21 < hayashi> wiki super and project super are two different level right
  +
16:21 <+Lord-Simon> Well, because the projects have two things
  +
16:22 <+Lord-Simon> as supervisor and an admin
  +
16:22 <+Lord-Simon> in name only
  +
16:22 < Misogi> We should rename it with "Project Manager"
  +
16:22 < Lery> What's the point in having an Project Admin and a Project Supervisor, by the way ? What's the differences between both ?
  +
16:22 < krytyk> ^Like misogi says
  +
16:22 < Lery> -an+a
  +
16:22 < krytyk> Supervisor is unclear at this point
  +
16:22 < cloudii> Imo, project supervisor should not have to be an official member of administration
  +
16:22 < hayashi> project admin is a carry over from the old days I think
  +
16:22 < Vallor> Yeah, administrators and supervisors are a big mess, especially for Alt. laguages
  +
16:22 < krytyk> there are wiki supervisors, and project supervisors
  +
16:22 < Kira0802> Alt. languages are a big mess
  +
16:22 < cloudii> I would like project supervisor to be the senior/leading translator
  +
16:22 <&DarkoNeko> we're drfiting away again ._.
  +
16:22 <+Lord-Simon> For me, as I see it.
  +
16:22 < Kira0802> it's not about supervisors/admins for alt projects
  +
16:23 < krytyk> Okay, can I write out few problems and possible solutions?
  +
16:23 < Lery> And the project admin to be someone with Wiki Supervisor Rights ?
  +
16:23 < stellarroze> my oh my
  +
16:23 <&DarkoNeko> krytyk, a bit later~
  +
16:23 < Kira0802> fuck
  +
16:23 < Kira0802> this is getting confusing
  +
16:23 < krytyk> its for this topic~
  +
16:23 < stellarroze> merge project supervisors and administrators
  +
16:23 <+Lord-Simon> The project admin is a person who is responsible for the project and that the guidelines of the project are "used/enforced".
  +
16:23 <&DarkoNeko> arg, mergin and renaming LATER
  +
16:23 < Lery> ^+1
  +
16:23 < stellarroze> into one position
  +
16:23 < Kira0802> they are meant for different things
  +
16:23 < Misogi> To avoid confusion, "Project Sup. -> Project Manager".
  +
16:23 < Misogi> Can be anyone.
  +
16:23 <&DarkoNeko> the subject is inactivity and then project supervisor replacement for now
  +
16:23 < Vallor> Admins and supervisors should be a single group renamed on 'project manager'
  +
16:24 <+Lord-Simon> The supervisor is a person who can be contacted and knows some details about that project.
  +
16:24 <&DarkoNeko> all the rest is for after
  +
16:24 < krytyk> we talk about Wiki supervisors or project supervisors darko
  +
16:24 < krytyk> thats the peoint
  +
16:24 < krytyk> point*
  +
16:24 < Kira0802> Imagine the difference of wiki right an editor has in comparison with a TLer. Now, change editor to admin and TLer to supervisor
  +
16:24 < krytyk> make it clear
  +
16:24 < Kira0802> that's how I see the diff
  +
16:24 <&DarkoNeko> I'm talking about inactivity
  +
16:24 <+Lord-Simon> Better is that the Supervisor, is a real supervisor and can lock and protect pages
  +
16:24 < Lery> Inactivity was already well defined I think...
  +
16:24 < krytyk> yes, but you mean supervisors with rights, or project supervisors
  +
16:24 <&DarkoNeko> Lery, but not voted
  +
16:24 < Lery> Lord-Simon +1
  +
16:24 < cloudii> I disagree with Simon
  +
16:25 < Kira0802> Can we just merge Project supervisors with Wiki supervisors?
  +
16:25 < Lery> But the Project Admin, right ?
  +
16:25 <+Lord-Simon> No
  +
16:25 <&DarkoNeko> krytyk, the first point is anyone being in a right group on the wiki, the 2nd point will be about local project (LN) managers
  +
16:25 < krytyk> no
  +
16:25 < krytyk> exactly
  +
16:25 < cloudii> because there's a lot of translators who would like to manage their projects
  +
16:25 <&DarkoNeko> so, let's get the first point ou t of the way, please
  +
16:25 < krytyk> so you talk about wiki supervisors and their inactivity
  +
16:25 < krytyk> now we can vote.
  +
16:25 < cloudii> Actually, I favor going back to DarkoNeko's topic
  +
16:25 <&DarkoNeko> not wiki supervisor. any group with more right than the defaulty
  +
16:25 < Lery> The Project Supervisor becomes Project Manager and the Project Admin has to have Supervisors' rights...
  +
16:26 <&DarkoNeko> http://www.baka-tsuki.org/project/index.php?title=Special:ListGroupRights <- we have all those groups
  +
16:26 < Lery> What's the point about voting to define inactivity ???
  +
16:26 < Vallor> What exactly are we talking about right now? About groups or inactivity?
  +
16:26 <&DarkoNeko> so
  +
16:26 < cloudii> Simon, you're the chair ;)
  +
16:26 < rock96> Shuffling with editors and translators is going to be the pain...
  +
16:26 <+Lord-Simon> Ok
  +
16:26 -!- nanodesuyo [[email protected]] has joined #Baka-Tsuki
  +
16:26 <+Lord-Simon> First of all
  +
16:27 <+Lord-Simon> we are voting for the inactivity period
  +
16:27 < cloudii> Okay, DarkoNeko, can you repeat what we're voting for?
  +
16:27 <&DarkoNeko> "anyone with over a year of inactivity will lose their special rights on the wiki."
  +
16:27 < cloudii> Can we define special rights?
  +
16:27 < Vallor> I don't like the '2 groups' idea...
  +
16:27 <+Lord-Simon> one thing I wanted to say
  +
16:28 -!- masoatwork [[email protected]] has joined #Baka-Tsuki
  +
16:28 -!- masoatwork is now known as victorrama
  +
16:28 <+Lord-Simon> do we really want a year inactivity ?
  +
16:28 <&DarkoNeko> any group they were put in (editor, supervisor, etc)
  +
16:28 -!- Gwilthyunman [[email protected]] has joined #Baka-Tsuki
  +
16:28 < krytyk> anyone above user
  +
16:28 < Vallor> 6 months aren't enough?
  +
16:28 < Kira0802> special rights on the wiki.-->Project supervisor/admins
  +
16:28 < hayashi> ^
  +
16:28 <+Lord-Simon> My point is
  +
16:28 <&DarkoNeko> Lord-Simon, it's purposelly large for now
  +
16:28 <+Lord-Simon> It is.
  +
16:28 <+Lord-Simon> Because
  +
16:28 < krytyk> 6 months... unless they mentioned being away prior to that
  +
16:28 <&DarkoNeko> I'm fairly sure we have people with 4 years od inactivity in those groups
  +
16:29 <+Lord-Simon> 1. The passwords on the wiki are weak
  +
16:29 <+Lord-Simon> 2
  +
16:29 <&DarkoNeko> even wikipedia gives a 12 months period
  +
16:29 <+Lord-Simon> 2. There is no password change enforcement.
  +
16:29 <&DarkoNeko> both the french and the english version, as far as I know
  +
16:29 < cloudii> Okay, so can I make a proposal?
  +
16:29 <+Lord-Simon> go on
  +
16:29 < Vallor> DarkoNeko: Everyone don't post everyday on Wikipedia...
  +
16:29 < cloudii> 1). One year of inactivty = loss of physical wiki rights
  +
16:29 < cloudii> 2). If you end up coming back, talk to a sysop to be reinstated
  +
16:30 <&DarkoNeko> Vallor, wikipedia admins are supposed to be active epopel
  +
16:30 < Kira0802> fine
  +
16:30 <&DarkoNeko> cloudii, exactly
  +
16:30 < cloudii> vote?
  +
16:30 <&DarkoNeko> approve
  +
16:30 < Kira0802> I can agree on that
  +
16:30 < Kira0802> Yea
  +
16:30 <+Lord-Simon> Ok, vote
  +
16:30 < Cthaeh> vote yes
  +
16:30 < rock96> yes
  +
16:30 < Lery> yes
  +
16:30 < hayashi> mondai nai
  +
16:30 < krytyk> y
  +
16:30 <&DarkoNeko> vote y
  +
16:30 < Vallor> yes
  +
16:30 < victorrama> Yea
  +
16:30 <+Lord-Simon> yes, even if I'm sceptical
  +
16:31 < Vallor> (I'm sure 6 months are good enough though)
  +
16:31 < Kira0802> (Same)
  +
16:31 < cloudii> (I personally don't care)
  +
16:31 < Vallor> ^^
  +
16:31 < rock96> (Not really)
  +
16:31 * DarkoNeko thinks he already has been inactive for 6 months
  +
16:31 < cloudii> xD but can we move along?
  +
16:31 < rock96> lol
  +
16:31 < Vallor> You can
  +
16:31 <+Lord-Simon> Vote : all approve
  +
16:31 <+Lord-Simon> lol
  +
16:31 < Misogi> Yes
  +
16:32 <&DarkoNeko> well, not recently but somewhere between now and 2006
  +
16:32 <+Lord-Simon> yes
  +
16:32 < cloudii> okay, now onto the topic of the project/wiki supervisors........
  +
16:32 < Kira0802> You can mark the length with an asterisk if it can be debated
  +
16:32 <+Lord-Simon> Nect point ?
  +
16:32 * Lery laught
  +
16:32 <&DarkoNeko> so, secondary inactivity point, about the project leaders
  +
16:32 < cloudii> OH right forgot
  +
16:32 < cloudii> DarkoNeko's thing xD
  +
16:32 * DarkoNeko blushes
  +
16:32 <&DarkoNeko> what thing ?
  +
16:32 * DarkoNeko hides
  +
16:32 <+Lord-Simon> black thing
  +
16:32 * Lord-Simon blushes
  +
16:32 < cloudii> Okay: we left off on this
  +
16:33 < Vallor> ...
  +
16:33 < cloudii> inactivity defined as: Wiki only or total presence (including social media)
  +
16:33 < Misogi> Total.
  +
16:33 <&DarkoNeko> oh
  +
16:33 <&DarkoNeko> uh.
  +
16:33 < Misogi> I mean, there may be reasons.
  +
16:33 <&DarkoNeko> let's keep that vague
  +
16:33 < Kira0802> dunno for social media
  +
16:33 <&DarkoNeko> let's say forum and wiki both count
  +
16:33 < cloudii> I'm for keeping it vague xD
  +
16:34 < Kira0802> i'm not going to add a random guy on Facebook to talk to him about BT
  +
16:34 < Misogi> "Any lack of presence"
  +
16:34 <+Lord-Simon> Reachability
  +
16:34 <&DarkoNeko> but ... well, social media, as in chatting with them on facebook or twitter ? that's stretching it
  +
16:34 < Kira0802> even though I'm already doing it.
  +
16:34 <+Lord-Simon> that's what we are talking about
  +
16:34 < Lery> Let's say you're active as long as you're sometimes on any BT-media...
  +
16:34 < krytyk> as long as you show signs of life
  +
16:34 < krytyk> lets leave it ambigious
  +
16:34 < krytyk> but everyone knwos what it means
  +
16:34 < Kira0802> Someone can check inactivity
  +
16:34 < krytyk> lets not overcomplicate
  +
16:34 < Lery> Yeah
  +
16:34 <&DarkoNeko> that seems like stretching it
  +
16:34 < cloudii> 1). If a Project Supervisor/Manager appears to be inactive
  +
16:34 < Misogi> Or unless it was told beforehand.
  +
16:35 <&DarkoNeko> we can easily check activity with the last post on the forum, or last edit on the wiki
  +
16:35 <&DarkoNeko> but anything else if but a fuzzy thing, it's not hard data
  +
16:35 < cloudii> 2). A translator may put in a request with Adminsitration, to be instated as the new Project Supervisor
  +
16:35 < Kira0802> Let's settle for "has shown no sign of life"
  +
16:35 < cloudii> and leave it to sysops/admins to decide
  +
16:35 < Vallor> My point is inactivity should be 'people we don't have news since X months'
  +
16:35 < cloudii> on a case-by case basis
  +
16:35 < krytyk> lets discuss the subjects inactivity when we come down to it
  +
16:35 < Lery> We could add in the rule that the said person is first asked through PM wheter (s)he's still active...
  +
16:35 <+Lord-Simon> I'll say no to the no 2
  +
16:35 < Lery> or not*
  +
16:35 <+Lord-Simon> "as the new Project Supervisor"
  +
16:35 < Kira0802> Nay to 2
  +
16:36 < Kira0802> You leave it blank
  +
16:36 < Kira0802> for the time being
  +
16:36 <&DarkoNeko> Lery, hm, I don't really want people to just do 1 edit to keep their rights and then go awol for ayear again
  +
16:36 < Lery> No, I disagree to 2 because we are mixing Project Supervisor with Wiki Supervisor there....
  +
16:36 < cloudii> okay
  +
16:36 < Misogi> May I propose something? (Will be long)
  +
16:37 < cloudii> go ahead
  +
16:37 < Vallor> DarkoNeko: +1
  +
16:37 < Lery> Well, it'd be more polite from us to warn them first, no ?
  +
16:37 < Misogi> First, rename Project Supervisors into Project Managers.
  +
16:37 < Lery> Imagine we were to remove your Wiki rights because you were inactive for 370 days, you'd be pissed, no ?
  +
16:37 < rock96> We can keep Supervisors busy before they go into the dark again, right? *grin*
  +
16:37 <&DarkoNeko> Lery, I wouldn't notice, since I wasn't there :D
  +
16:37 < Misogi> Anyone can become Manager.
  +
16:37 < cloudii> Misogi +1
  +
16:37 <&DarkoNeko> but from experience, yeah, a few ex wiki admin took it badly
  +
16:37 < krytyk> lets listen to misogi now
  +
16:38 < Kira0802> OK, fine with that
  +
16:38 < krytyk> talking over one another is rude
  +
16:38 <&DarkoNeko> even tho they were warned on their user talk page
  +
16:38 < Vallor> Misogi: +1
  +
16:38 < Lery> It costs us nothing to warn firstly I think
  +
16:38 <&DarkoNeko> yes, a message on talk page
  +
16:38 < Lery> @Misogi +1
  +
16:38 <&DarkoNeko> ok, lemme add that on wiki
  +
16:38 <+Lord-Simon> So, now we have "Project Admin" and "Project Managers" ?
  +
16:39 < cloudii> So in this system: 1) Project Administrators are "Wiki supervisors" 2). Project Managers can be anymore (but preferably head translator)
  +
16:39 <&DarkoNeko> Project Supervisors into Project Managers <- a short reason why ? do they have a particular physicial right currently ?
  +
16:39 < Kira0802> I'm ok with that
  +
16:39 < Misogi> For 1, Supervisors or above.
  +
16:39 <+Lord-Simon> I'm confused by that too
  +
16:39 < cloudii> Project Supervisors have no mod rights, but they have all rights with regards to translations
  +
16:39 < cloudii> like "British English vs. American English"
  +
16:39 < Lery> Well the term is currently misleading since Project Supervisors aren't official Wiki Supervisors
  +
16:39 <+Lord-Simon> Because I see an admin responsible for the project
  +
16:39 < Misogi> Well, it's to avoid confusions between Project and Wiki.
  +
16:39 <&DarkoNeko> so, they're informal translation project leaders, in other words
  +
16:39 < Kira0802> Let's replace project Admins by Wiki supervisor then
  +
16:39 < cloudii> exactly, DarkoNeko
  +
16:40 < Kira0802> no need to stay vague
  +
16:40 <+Lord-Simon> Supervisors is the person who oversees if everything is ok, more or less
  +
16:40 < cloudii> 1). Rename Project Admin to Wiki Supervisor
  +
16:40 < Lery> @Kira0802 +1
  +
16:40 <+Lord-Simon> and enters the scene when there are problems
  +
16:40 < cloudii> 2). Rename Project Supervisor to Project Manager
  +
16:40 < cloudii> Project manager can be anyone but does not have mod rights
  +
16:40 <&DarkoNeko> Translation project leader sounds better to me
  +
16:40 <&DarkoNeko> it's more self explanatory
  +
16:40 <+Lord-Simon> ^
  +
16:40 < cloudii> Project Leader?
  +
16:40 < Misogi> Nah, I disagree.
  +
16:40 <&DarkoNeko> project can be understood as the wiki as a whjole
  +
16:40 < krytyk> Project bancho
  +
16:41 < rock96> ...cult leader...
  +
16:41 < Cthaeh> +1 project leader
  +
16:41 <+Lord-Simon> nani ?
  +
16:41 < hayashi> head translator
  +
16:41 < krytyk> ^
  +
16:41 < Lery> Leader sounds grandly to me...
  +
16:41 < hayashi> would be simplier
  +
16:41 < Kira0802> no
  +
16:41 <+Lord-Simon> no
  +
16:41 <&DarkoNeko> hmm
  +
16:41 < Kira0802> head translator != project leader
  +
16:41 <+Lord-Simon> hayashi, no
  +
16:41 < cloudii> We have situations like Log Horizon
  +
16:41 < Kira0802> see campione.
  +
16:41 < cloudii> where the head translator isn't even on the wiki
  +
16:41 <&DarkoNeko> head translator aslo has a feel of "above translators", but not related to a project in particular
  +
16:41 < Misogi> "Project Supervisor -> Project Manager" ; "Project Adminstrator -> Supervisor in charge"
  +
16:42 <+Lord-Simon> Misogi +1
  +
16:42 <&DarkoNeko> urg, my poor head XD
  +
16:42 < cloudii> Misogi -1, I'm sorry xD
  +
16:42 < Kira0802> Who's that "Supervisor in charge"?
  +
16:42 < Kira0802> Wiki sup?
  +
16:42 < hayashi> wiki supers
  +
16:42 <+Lord-Simon> remove the " in charge"
  +
16:42 < cloudii> Prefer Kira's, "Wiki Supervisor"
  +
16:42 < Misogi> I don't like putting "wiki" on a project.
  +
16:42 <&DarkoNeko> wiki supervisor doesn't sound local to a translation project at all
  +
16:42 < Misogi> post*
  +
16:42 < rock96> Maybe get rid of Project Administrators entirely? 'Cept for special cases like Haganai
  +
16:42 < Kira0802> ...Supervisor then?
  +
16:42 <+Lord-Simon> Ok, let's do the following
  +
16:43 < Kira0802> Just remove the "wiki" part
  +
16:43 < Misogi> Ok then. Supervisor is enough.
  +
16:43 < Vallor> 'Supervisor' is good
  +
16:43 < cloudii> Alright, now Misogi +1
  +
16:43 < cloudii> <3
  +
16:43 <+Lord-Simon> as of now, no project has any "Project Adminstrator", not "Project Supervisor"
  +
16:43 < rock96> Haganai?
  +
16:43 < Kira0802> every project has a project admin
  +
16:43 <&DarkoNeko> so, to have the def right : "supervisors are ... ?"
  +
16:43 <+Lord-Simon> Create a name
  +
16:43 <+Lord-Simon> and give it a meaning
  +
16:43 < Kira0802> when it's blank, it's Onizuka-GTO by default
  +
16:43 < Kira0802> lol
  +
16:44 < Vallor> Supervisors are supervisors.
  +
16:44 < cloudii> Well, http://www.baka-tsuki.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=3194
  +
16:44 < Misogi> "Project Supervisor -> Project Manager (anyone)" ; "Project Administrator -> Supervisor (wiki supervisor or above"
  +
16:44 < cloudii> To represent Oni's voice
  +
16:44 < cloudii> and TLG who is not here
  +
16:44 < cloudii> they once spoke about this topic
  +
16:44 <+Lord-Simon> So...
  +
16:44 <&DarkoNeko> supervisor imply it doesn't need to have much hand in the making, i like that
  +
16:44 <+Lord-Simon> Vote for Misogi's option ?: "Project Supervisor -> Project Manager (anyone)" ; "Project Administrator -> Supervisor (wiki supervisor or above"
  +
16:44 < cloudii> Yes
  +
16:45 < krytyk> that should be okay.
  +
16:45 < krytyk> yes
  +
16:45 < Kira0802> Yea
  +
16:45 < Lery> It's true that most project have an N/A as Project Admin / Supervisor currently...
  +
16:45 < Vallor> Yeah
  +
16:45 < Misogi> Yes (although I may not count)
  +
16:45 < Lery> yes
  +
16:45 < Cthaeh> yes, vote
  +
16:45 <&DarkoNeko> i'd have preferred "translation project manager" for clarity, but I'll take that
  +
16:45 < cloudii> Onizuka once voiced TLG's opinion that all the positions need to be filled
  +
16:46 < cloudii> Okay, resolved?
  +
16:46 < rock96> 'K, I think
  +
16:46 < cloudii> Okay, so backtrack to the last point
  +
16:46 <+Lord-Simon> no
  +
16:46 < cloudii> Project Manager inactivity?
  +
16:46 <&DarkoNeko> so
  +
16:46 <&DarkoNeko> wait
  +
16:46 <+Lord-Simon> ^
  +
16:46 <&DarkoNeko> Project Manager, does he need to be one of rhe translators ?
  +
16:46 < Kira0802> No,
  +
16:46 < rock96> Not really?
  +
16:46 <+Lord-Simon> no
  +
16:46 -!- coldacid [[email protected]] has joined #Baka-Tsuki
  +
16:46 < Lery> No
  +
16:46 < cloudii> usually, but doesn't have to be
  +
16:46 <&DarkoNeko> that sounds a bit weird
  +
16:46 < Misogi> No, but it'd be better.
  +
16:46 < Kira0802> It's not.
  +
16:47 < Misogi> It can be an editor.
  +
16:47 < Kira0802> An editor can do the job.
  +
16:47 < cloudii> should be the most invested individual in the project
  +
16:47 < Misogi> Or someone else more experienced on BT.
  +
16:47 < Lery> Well, Project Manager should be able to use the wiki correctly and to take decision when it's needed, that's it.
  +
16:47 < Vallor> Why an editor wouldn't have th rights to be a project manager...?
  +
16:47 <&DarkoNeko> http://www.baka-tsuki.org/project/index.php?title=Talk:Meeting:March302014#project_leading_and_supervisions <- is that formulation ok with everyone ?
  +
16:47 < Vallor> the right*
  +
16:47 < Misogi> He can.
  +
16:47 < Vallor> That's what I'm saying
  +
16:47 < Lery> except for the "fo" and the "z" :P
  +
16:48 <&DarkoNeko> meh, correcting
  +
16:48 <&DarkoNeko> "Project Supervisor -> Project Manager (usually one of the translators or editors)"
  +
16:48 <&DarkoNeko> "Project Administrator -> Supervisor (wiki supervisor or above)"
  +
16:48 < rock96> No, don;t
  +
16:48 < krytyk> well as long as its the highest authority when it comes to shape of the project
  +
16:48 < krytyk> it can be either tl or editor
  +
16:48 < rock96> We're a lazy bunch, alright
  +
16:48 <+Lord-Simon> @DarkoNeko, yes.
  +
16:48 <&DarkoNeko> tio be hoenst, supervisors don't *want* to have to manage local projects
  +
16:48 < Misogi> The Manager can also be an experienced member of BT, if the TL is inexperienced with BT.
  +
16:48 <&DarkoNeko> we're just there to be consulted in case of questions or problems
  +
16:48 < Lery> That's the point in having Project Manager ;)
  +
16:48 < Misogi> (Which is what I do.)
  +
16:49 <+Lord-Simon> ^^^
  +
16:49 < Lery> Well, Misogi, you're a supervisor too.
  +
16:49 < cloudii> Are we resolved here?
  +
16:49 < Kira0802> is this matter settled?
  +
16:49 < Misogi> Yes.
  +
16:49 <+Lord-Simon> Darko ?
  +
16:50 < Lery> Yes
  +
16:50 <+Lord-Simon> DarkoNeko, you there. Are you alive ?
  +
16:50 * DarkoNeko breathes
  +
16:50 <&DarkoNeko> yes, yes I am
  +
16:50 <+Lord-Simon> Ok
  +
16:50 <+Lord-Simon> then to the next topic
  +
16:50 <+Lord-Simon> or poin
  +
16:50 <+Lord-Simon> t
  +
16:51 < cloudii> We never voted on Project Manager inactivity
  +
16:51 <&DarkoNeko> yes, that's the next point
  +
16:51 < Lery> Didn't we ?
  +
16:51 <&DarkoNeko> nope
  +
16:51 <+Lord-Simon> So, as darko has written:
  +
16:51 <+Lord-Simon> If a Project Supervisor/Manager appears to be inactive
  +
16:51 <+Lord-Simon> A translator may put in a request with Adminsitration, to be instated as the new Project Supervisor
  +
16:51 < rock96> let's just make it that if no one can reach the Manager then we start the clock?
  +
16:52 <+Lord-Simon> Define the time span
  +
16:52 < Misogi> 6 months here.
  +
16:52 <&DarkoNeko> do wer define a minimu activity ? it feels better to be cvague here
  +
16:52 < rock96> In this case 6 months, yeah
  +
16:52 < Lery> Yeah, that's fine so. Let's say 3 months
  +
16:52 <&DarkoNeko> you don't want to wait 3 months to do soemthing because that guy isn't here
  +
16:52 < cloudii> Um, I favor no time span on this
  +
16:52 < Kira0802> off topic guys, but my IP has been blocked
  +
16:52 < Lery> An active project has to be responsive...
  +
16:52 < cloudii> Say for example Hatamaou gets a no-name Project Manager
  +
16:52 <&DarkoNeko> most translators/editors would be gone after such a time
  +
16:52 <+Lord-Simon> I'd go with the suggestion that rock96 made
  +
16:52 < cloudii> but they vanish after 2 weeks
  +
16:52 < Lery> Again ? You spammer :P
  +
16:52 < cloudii> what then?
  +
16:52 <+Lord-Simon> "let's just make it that if no one can reach the Manager then we start the clock?"
  +
16:52 < Misogi> Hmm... perhaps we should describe the situation.
  +
16:53 < cloudii> We never described the protocol for becoming Project Manager
  +
16:53 < hayashi> managers should be reachable
  +
16:53 < Kira0802> I'll go with 6 months
  +
16:53 < hayashi> at least in a week
  +
16:53 < Misogi> For inactive projects, no problems (it's usually above 6 months).
  +
16:53 < hayashi> no one's going to wait 6 months
  +
16:53 <&DarkoNeko> cloudii, typically it's the translation project creator
  +
16:53 -!- victorrama [[email protected]] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
  +
16:53 < Misogi> For active projects, it can be less. 3 months.
  +
16:53 < cloudii> �
  +
16:53 < cloudii> exactly
  +
16:53 -!- DefaultMelody [[email protected]] has joined #Baka-Tsuki
  +
16:53 < cloudii> but that's why they tend to vanish
  +
16:53 <&DarkoNeko> hm
  +
16:53 < Kira0802> well
  +
16:53 < cloudii> I think the Project Manager should be reachable within one week
  +
16:54 < Vallor> if the project manager has disappeared since 6 months, any translator/editor of the project can become the new manager, with the consent of the supervisor
  +
16:54 < cloudii> that's a very reasonable expectation
  +
16:54 < rock96> Nah, for extrememly active projects we need to greatly reduce the time span...
  +
16:54 <+Lord-Simon> Let's go with a week after the Manages is not reachable.
  +
16:54 <&DarkoNeko> a fixed duration feels wrong here. We could add that if the project manager isn't available, anyone that is should be free to do his role in the interim
  +
16:54 < Kira0802> a week for removal?
  +
16:54 <+Lord-Simon> Week is a good time span. In general.
  +
16:54 < Vallor> That was my point
  +
16:54 < cloudii> Place the power in Administration for mo�aking case-by-case decisions
  +
16:54 < Kira0802> hell, if I'M off to china for 3 months, what happens?
  +
16:54 < cloudii> don't specify a week
  +
16:54 < Cthaeh> opposed to week
  +
16:54 <+Lord-Simon> A week for action
  +
16:54 <&DarkoNeko> and only have a proper, official replacement after the duration of your choice (a month ? 3 months ?)
  +
16:54 <&DarkoNeko> Kira0802, if you warned first it's different
  +
16:54 < Lery> Let's say that two week of non declared hiatus is too much
  +
16:54 <+Lord-Simon> After that, the supervisor has to take a look
  +
16:55 -!- xiiao [[email protected]] has joined #Baka-Tsuki
  +
16:55 < Kira0802> I'll go with 10 days
  +
16:55 < Lery> If you go to china for 3 months, if you're polite, you would warn first :P
  +
16:55 < Misogi> We'll add that to the admin contact page.
  +
16:55 <+Lord-Simon> ^^taht
  +
16:55 < Misogi> I'll go with one month.
  +
16:55 -!- masoatwork [[email protected]] has joined #Baka-Tsuki
  +
16:55 -!- masoatwork is now known as victorrama
  +
16:55 <+Lord-Simon> Well, Misogi..
  +
16:56 < Misogi> At least, in case of unexpected absences.
  +
16:56 <+Lord-Simon> If I understand correctly
  +
16:56 <&DarkoNeko> hmm, no matter the choice of duration, i propose to add "a project manager may designate someone as interim if he knows he'll be unavailble for a while"
  +
16:56 <+Lord-Simon> it's all about the Translators and the Adminst
  +
16:56 <+Lord-Simon> *managers
  +
16:56 < Lery> As long as we distinguish the non-announced hiatus from the announced ones...
  +
16:56 <+Lord-Simon> Ok, the situation:
  +
16:57 <+Lord-Simon> There is a TL that is translating a novel
  +
16:57 <+Lord-Simon> He requests an action or coordination from the manager
  +
16:57 <+Lord-Simon> The manager does not respond
  +
16:57 <+Lord-Simon> 1
  +
16:57 <+Lord-Simon> day
  +
16:57 <+Lord-Simon> 2 days
  +
16:57 <+Lord-Simon> 3 days
  +
16:57 <+Lord-Simon> and it goes on.
  +
16:57 < Misogi> Ah, that ?
  +
16:58 <+Lord-Simon> What is the limit, where you patience runs out.
  +
16:58 < Misogi> Well, if it's the delay of contact, then 1-2 weeks will be good.
  +
16:58 < cloudii> I'm in favor of 2 weeks
  +
16:58 < Kira0802> 10 days
  +
16:58 < cloudii> of unexcused absense
  +
16:58 < hayashi> 1 week
  +
16:58 < cloudii> "undeclared absense"
  +
16:58 <&DarkoNeko> I propose to vote on one thing we probably all gagree with first
  +
16:58 <&DarkoNeko> "If a project manager knows they'll be away for a while, they should designate a subtitute to take all decisions in their absence"
  +
16:59 < cloudii> Sure
  +
16:59 < hayashi> that I can agree with
  +
16:59 <+Lord-Simon> yes
  +
16:59 < rock96> no prob
  +
16:59 <&DarkoNeko> one advance of saying that upfront is that everything else will necessary only apply to unannounced absences
  +
16:59 < Vallor> of course
  +
16:59 <&DarkoNeko> advantage*
  +
16:59 < Lery> alright
  +
16:59 * DarkoNeko add "the following only apply for unannounced absences"
  +
17:00 < Misogi> Let's resume it.
  +
17:00 <&DarkoNeko> ok
  +
17:00 < hayashi> 1 week
  +
17:00 < cloudii> Let's do nominations then votes?
  +
17:00 <+Lord-Simon> ^
  +
17:00 < Lery> Let's do it two weeks then.
  +
17:00 < cloudii> kira nominated 10 days
  +
17:00 < cloudii> any other nominations?
  +
17:00 * DarkoNeko groans
  +
17:01 < cloudii> 1). 1 week 2). 2 weeks 3). 10 days
  +
17:01 < cloudii> vote
  +
17:01 <&DarkoNeko> I don't like having precise times for that
  +
17:01 < Lery> Anyway, after one week of waiting, I guess anybody would already have contacted the Supervisor...
  +
17:01 <&DarkoNeko> it's... too bureaucratic
  +
17:01 < cloudii> Are they contacting the supervisor to ask if they can fill the position?
  +
17:01 < Lery> Let's say : as soon as it reaches an Admin's ear and that it has been more than 10 days, then...
  +
17:01 <&DarkoNeko> "if a request to the project manager goes unanswered within a few days, then [contact the supervisor for opinion]/[do the thing]" ?
  +
17:02 <+Lord-Simon> My suggestion is: 1) 1 week missing and the project staff complains, reconsider the management and talk to them. 2) 2 weeks of non-activity or response, the place will be changed with another person
  +
17:02 <+Lord-Simon> ^^
  +
17:02 <&DarkoNeko> hmm
  +
17:02 <&DarkoNeko> so, after the first week, you designate a de facto substitute
  +
17:02 <&DarkoNeko> and after [x] weeks, that person becomes the official project manager
  +
17:02 <+Lord-Simon> Like that. To have at least a person who can do that
  +
17:02 < Lery> Hell, that's a detail, don't we have tons of other matters to discuss ???
  +
17:02 <+Lord-Simon> or answers in time
  +
17:02 < cloudii> imo… that feels even more bureaucratic…. but whatever
  +
17:03 <&DarkoNeko> well, that imply that proijects have more than one person XD
  +
17:03 < Lery> That's fine so
  +
17:03 < Lery> Let's go with it
  +
17:03 < Misogi> Just tell that it's a case-by-case request.
  +
17:03 < Lery> Vote
  +
17:03 <&DarkoNeko> with it, which one lol
  +
17:03 < Kira0802> let's leave it tp "1 week to 2 weeks"?
  +
17:03 -!- arczyx [[email protected]] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
  +
17:03 < Kira0802> leave it to*
  +
17:03 <&DarkoNeko> "after a while" ?
  +
17:03 < Kira0802> we can redefine that
  +
17:03 <+Lord-Simon> "1) 1 week missing and the project staff complains, reconsider the management and talk to them. 2) 2 weeks of non-activity or response, the place will be changed with another person"
  +
17:03 <&DarkoNeko> hmm
  +
17:03 <+Lord-Simon> "so, after the first week, you designate a de facto substitute"
  +
17:03 <+Lord-Simon> "and after [x] weeks, that person becomes the official project manager"
  +
17:04 < Kira0802> I can agree with that
  +
17:04 < cloudii> 1 week missing de facto, 1 month official
  +
17:04 <+Lord-Simon> also
  +
17:04 <+Lord-Simon> " 17:02:05 Lord-Simon"
  +
17:04 <+Lord-Simon> fauck
  +
17:04 <+Lord-Simon> " "if a request to the project manager goes unanswered within a few days, then [contact the supervisor for opinion]/[do the thing]" ?"
  +
17:04 < cloudii> Actually, I favor Simon's more xD
  +
17:04 < Kira0802> consult others first, then do it
  +
17:05 < Kira0802> if there's disagreement, go to supervisor
  +
17:05 < cloudii> if a request to the project manager goes unanswered within a few days, then [contact the supervisor for opinion] and ask to become the de-facto project manager?
  +
17:05 < cloudii> That's what it translates to for me
  +
17:05 <&DarkoNeko> uh, let's do a mix, then
  +
17:05 <&DarkoNeko> "1) if a project manager is missing (minimum a week, and decision to take) and the project staff complains, reconsider the management and talk to them. A subtitute manager is designated amongst the active member of the translation project"
  +
17:05 <&DarkoNeko> "2) after [2 ?] weeks of non-activity or response, the subtitute officially become the new manager"
  +
17:06 <&DarkoNeko> and ther are decisions to take*
  +
17:06 <+Lord-Simon> VOTE
  +
17:06 < Kira0802> Yea
  +
17:06 <+Lord-Simon> yes
  +
17:06 < Cthaeh> opposed
  +
17:06 < cloudii> For point 2, can we specify duration?
  +
17:06 < rock96> Just add case by case, and I'm fine with this.
  +
17:06 < cloudii> I strongly just favor a case-by-case basis approach
  +
17:06 <&DarkoNeko> rock96, anything we decide here isn't a rock hard rule, tho, we need flexibility
  +
17:07 < Kira0802> ehe
  +
17:07 < Lery> yeah
  +
17:07 <&DarkoNeko> Cthaeh, why ?
  +
17:07 < rock96> Which is why I propose this~
  +
17:07 < Cthaeh> The danger I'm seeing here is that the translator forgets to say s/he will be gone for x-weeks, an editor (or translator with vastly different opinions) comes by and wants to make large changes, and then those large changes are made and the translator comes back after x weeks and is annoyed that something they considered important was completely changed
  +
17:07 < Kira0802> rock 96, rock hard hehe
  +
17:07 < Cthaeh> One example might be something like past/present tense
  +
17:07 <&DarkoNeko> ..hmmm
  +
17:07 < cloudii> I agree with Cthaeh
  +
17:07 < Misogi> Same here.
  +
17:07 < cloudii> which is why a case-by-case approach is much more flexible
  +
17:07 < rock96> I wanna change the name *slams head into the wall*
  +
17:07 < krytyk> so the editors who consult changes with translator exist?
  +
17:07 < krytyk> i though thats just a myth
  +
17:07 <&DarkoNeko> rhoo
  +
17:07 < krytyk> thought*
  +
17:08 * DarkoNeko pat pats krytyk
  +
17:08 < Lery> @Cthaeh Special cases like BegginerXP and so one should always be treated as special anyway...
  +
17:08 < cloudii> leaves it up to Administration to decide whether the replacement should occur
  +
17:08 < Misogi> It exists.
  +
17:08 < cloudii> It's a valid concern
  +
17:08 <+Lord-Simon> My thought here was as a Manager and not a TL being a manager. Just the position of a Mangaer
  +
17:08 < Kira0802> OK, so consultation first?
  +
17:08 <&DarkoNeko> well, that's another case, then : "if the project manager has signifiant opposition with the other members of their project, what happens" ?
  +
17:08 < cloudii> The Project Manager has the right to define all translation details for the project
  +
17:08 <+Lord-Simon> That's a a given
  +
17:08 < krytyk> manager being the authority on the project shape
  +
17:09 < krytyk> stylistic wise
  +
17:09 < cloudii> I would personally like to pile all of these issues onto the Supervisor to resolve XD
  +
17:09 < cloudii> and handle it on a case-by-case basis
  +
17:09 < Kira0802> fine
  +
17:09 < krytyk> theres hardly anything else there, right
  +
17:09 < cloudii> Supervisor can seek consultation from other supervisors
  +
17:09 <+Lord-Simon> agree
  +
17:09 * DarkoNeko groans at the potential issues
  +
17:09 < cloudii> The caveat here is that Supervisors need to be named for all projects
  +
17:10 < cloudii> *must
  +
17:10 < cloudii> can no longer leave them blank
  +
17:10 <+Lord-Simon> to the "and handle it on a case-by-case basis" and "Supervisor can seek consultation from other supervisors"
  +
17:10 < cloudii> the supervisor doesn't have to be invested in the project. They're available for conflict resolution
  +
17:10 <&DarkoNeko> all blanks are de facto affected to any and all supervisors
  +
17:10 < krytyk> EVIL PLAN 1: name darko supervisor for all projects
  +
17:10 <&DarkoNeko> i hate you
  +
17:10 < krytyk> EVIL PLAN 1.1: Laugh
  +
17:10 < Kira0802> if a project manager can't be trusted, s/he can't be a manager
  +
17:11 < rock96> The outcome of EVIL PLAN: ban from wiki.
  +
17:11 <&DarkoNeko> ok, let's add that, then
  +
17:11 < cloudii> There are situations when we just have to be like nanodesuyo. If the manager is unsatisfactory (or generates a lot of resistence), the supervisor needs to stand up and say, sorry, but you can't be manager.
  +
17:11 <&DarkoNeko> "the subtitute must be a trusted person from the project"
  +
17:11 <&DarkoNeko> or something like that ?
  +
17:11 <&DarkoNeko> as in, they chosoe it amongst themselves
  +
17:11 < cloudii> Just let the supervisor decide......
  +
17:11 -!- KuroiHikari|m [[email protected]] has joined #Baka-Tsuki
  +
17:12 < krytyk> The substitute must be a person already involved in project, and a reliable authority concerning it.
  +
17:12 <&DarkoNeko> and the supervisor only nod, or refuse if there's a blablant problem
  +
17:12 < Misogi> "In cases of inactivity or management problems, a supervisor can be asked to name another Project Manager"
  +
17:12 <&DarkoNeko> the supervisor doesn't know each and every problem on the project
  +
17:12 < Cthaeh> agree that supervisor should consult someone who is/has been active on the project in the case that a project manager change request is made
  +
17:12 < krytyk> o/ kuro-chan
  +
17:12 < cloudii> Misogi +1
  +
17:12 <&DarkoNeko> we're outsider, if there's an annoying person we'll probably don't know until it's too late
  +
17:12 < Vallor> Misogi: +1
  +
17:12 < cloudii> the supervisor should consult with the entire project team though
  +
17:12 < Lery> Let's say : the subsitute should be DarkoNeko, who will decide after studying the case who could take the lead if the real Manager were to really go MIA
  +
17:12 < Misogi> Of course.
  +
17:12 < Kira0802> Misogi: +1
  +
17:12 < cloudii> but we can expect the supervisor to give an unbiased opinion
  +
17:12 < Cthaeh> cloud put it better
  +
17:13 <&DarkoNeko> ...tho, in my opinion, the manager should be someone people of his project trusts
  +
17:13 <&DarkoNeko> you can't do a collaborative project with people you hate, it just doesn't work
  +
17:13 < Kira0802> yeah, he can be sacked, i'm ok with that
  +
17:13 <+Lord-Simon> ^
  +
17:13 < cloudii> personal conflicts are included with "management problems"
  +
17:13 < Misogi> "In cases of inactivity or management problems, the project staff can ask the Supervisor to statute on that case"
  +
17:14 < Vallor> cloudii: +1
  +
17:14 < hayashi> cool
  +
17:14 <&DarkoNeko> Misogi, that's kind of a given already
  +
17:14 < cloudii> I personally like how misogi worded the last one better xD
  +
17:14 < cloudii> it's clearer
  +
17:14 < Misogi> I tried to reformulate the rule.
  +
17:14 < Kira0802> Someone make a statement?
  +
17:15 -!- rock96 is now known as Lock
  +
17:15 < Vallor> I agree with the misogi's last rule
  +
17:15 < cloudii> No, I'd like the supervisor to have the power to legitimately select the Project Manager, after conslutation with the entire project team
  +
17:15 < krytyk> "In cases of inactivity or management problems, the project staff can ask Supervisor to appoitn a new manager from among the current project staff."
  +
17:15 < krytyk> appoint*
  +
17:15 <&DarkoNeko> cloudii, that's basically the equivalent of the team choosing themselves
  +
17:15 < cloudii> I just think it's a power of the supervisor that should be clarified
  +
17:15 < Misogi> "to statute on the Project Manager's nomination" ?
  +
17:16 <&DarkoNeko> and the supervisor just saying "sure, why the hell not"
  +
17:16 < cloudii> that's find too
  +
17:16 -!- joay_b [[email protected]] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
  +
17:16 < cloudii> but I think it's a necessary moderating power
  +
17:16 < krytyk> I believe supervisors know more or less background on projects
  +
17:16 < krytyk> or can ask around on irc for example
  +
17:16 < Misogi> "In case of inactivity or management problems, the project staff can ask the Supervisor to statute on the Project Manager's nomination."
  +
17:16 < cloudii> krytyk +1
  +
17:16 < Kira0802> Supervisor=Absolute unbiased authorioty under the great admins
  +
17:16 < Kira0802> authority*
  +
17:16 < cloudii> or misogi +1
  +
17:16 < krytyk> so its not like they are completely clueless
  +
17:16 < cloudii> XD
  +
17:16 <&DarkoNeko> Kira0802, uniformed decisions can be misguided, and that's one supervisor saying :)
  +
17:17 < krytyk> well, democracy sucks
  +
17:17 < krytyk> thats why
  +
17:17 < cloudii> You just have to be responsible and talk to the project team
  +
17:17 <&DarkoNeko> dictature is fun as long as it's me
  +
17:17 < cloudii> and try and make a decision based on past contributions
  +
17:17 < cloudii> you can see the contributions log
  +
17:17 < krytyk> 0,
  +
17:17 < Misogi> Well then, may we decide what we'll vote?
  +
17:17 < Kira0802> ^
  +
17:17 < cloudii> Misogi: "In case of inactivity or management problems, the project staff can ask the Supervisor to statute on the Project Manager's nomination."
  +
17:18 < Lery> Vote
  +
17:18 < Lery> Yes
  +
17:18 < cloudii> yes
  +
17:18 < Kira0802> Yea
  +
17:18 < Lock> yup
  +
17:18 < Misogi> Yes, I guess.
  +
17:18 < krytyk> ...make it more clear. No for the time being.
  +
17:18 <&DarkoNeko> "A subtitute manager may be chosen by the remaining active member and approved by the supervisor" ?
  +
17:18 < krytyk> "statute for nomination" is unclear.
  +
17:18 < krytyk> that part.
  +
17:18 < Misogi> I'll correct that.
  +
17:18 -!- Jerl [[email protected]] has joined #Baka-Tsuki
  +
17:18 -!- mode/#baka-tsuki [+ao Jerl Jerl] by [^_^]
  +
17:18 < Gero-chan> Get out, p-pervert.
  +
17:19 < cloudii> Disagree with DarkoNeko's
  +
17:19 <&DarkoNeko> eeh
  +
17:19 < cloudii> I still think supervisor should have total selection power
  +
17:19 < Lery> Let's say that Darkoneko has to find a nice sentence to give the appropriate idea in the minutes...
  +
17:19 < Misogi> "In case of inactivity or management problems, the project staff can ask the Supervisor to statute on a temporary or permanent Project Manager nomination."
  +
17:20 < hayashi> sounds fair
  +
17:20 < hayashi> but you'll need active supers
  +
17:20 < cloudii> "In the case of inactivity or management problems, the project staff can ask the Supervisor to nominate the Project Manager"
  +
17:20 < Lery> Yeah, that's vague but vague is fine
  +
17:20 <&DarkoNeko> "In case of inactivity or management problems, the project staff may ask the Supervisor to mediate and/or choose a new Project Manager amongst the active project members" ?
  +
17:20 < krytyk> yay, cloudi made it clear.
  +
17:20 < krytyk> something liek that darko
  +
17:20 < Lery> "In case of inactivity or management problems, the project staff may ask the Supervisor to mediate and/or choose a new Project Manager amongst the active project members, but a cat is fine, too" ?
  +
17:20 < krytyk> can someone make it longer?!
  +
17:20 < Lock> Yes!
  +
17:21 -!- nanodesuyo [[email protected]] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
  +
17:21 <&DarkoNeko> I can ALWAYS make it longer
  +
17:21 < krytyk> thats bragging
  +
17:21 * Lord-Simon blushes
  +
17:21 < Lery> He's French ;)
  +
17:21 < Kira0802> Ehehe
  +
17:21 * Lock groans
  +
17:21 <+Lord-Simon> So
  +
17:21 < Misogi> "In case of inactivity or management issues, the project staff may ask the Supervisor to statute on a transitory or permanent Project Manager nomination."
  +
17:21 <+Lord-Simon> Vote for: "In case of inactivity or management problems, the project staff may ask the Supervisor to mediate and/or choose a new Project Manager amongst the active project members"
  +
17:21 < cloudii> Yes
  +
17:21 <&DarkoNeko> Misogi, I don't really understand "nomination"
  +
17:21 < krytyk> change to appoint
  +
17:21 <&DarkoNeko> yes
  +
17:21 < krytyk> simple
  +
17:21 < krytyk> done
  +
17:21 < Lock> yeah
  +
17:21 < Kira0802> final form?
  +
17:21 < Cthaeh> yes
  +
17:21 < krytyk> saishu keitai
  +
17:21 < Lery> @DarkoNeko : the same as in FR
  +
17:22 < Kira0802> Yea
  +
17:22 < Lery> yes
  +
17:22 < cloudii> Can we restate the final form?
  +
17:22 <&DarkoNeko> "In case of inactivity or management problems, the project staff may ask the Supervisor to mediate and/or appoint a new Project Manager amongst the active project members"
  +
17:22 < Lery> it's just lacking a genitive
  +
17:22 < cloudii> Vote just to clarify
  +
17:22 < cloudii> yes
  +
17:22 < Kira0802> Yea
  +
17:22 < krytyk> yes
  +
17:22 <+Lord-Simon> yes
  +
17:22 < Lery> y
  +
17:22 < Lock> yes...
  +
17:22 < Cthaeh> y
  +
17:22 < Misogi> Yes (you can replace problems with issues)
  +
17:23 < cloudii> resolved?
  +
17:23 <&DarkoNeko> looks like it
  +
17:23 < Kira0802> Next! :D
  +
17:23 < cloudii> I have one for thing
  +
17:23 < cloudii> appointment of project managers
  +
17:23 < cloudii> self nominations or contact supervisor?
  +
17:23 < Lery> sudo apt-get install next_topic
  +
17:23 < cloudii> (assuming position is blank)
  +
17:23 < hayashi> contact
  +
17:23 < Lock> staff appoints the manager.
  +
17:23 <&DarkoNeko> I'm all for having it stay the project creator by defaulty
  +
17:24 < Misogi> Just tell it on the administration contact page.
  +
17:24 < cloudii> Misogi +1
  +
17:24 < hayashi> at least courtesy informing
  +
17:24 < krytyk> project creator is often the person who made the teaser and left it as is
  +
17:24 < krytyk> thus no.
  +
17:24 < KuroiHikari|m> Head TL or someone the head TL agrees with
  +
17:24 < Kira0802> Staff appoints, Supervisor agrees
  +
17:24 < cloudii> agree with krytyk
  +
17:24 <&DarkoNeko> then a new person appoint self, as on the thing we just voted on
  +
17:25 < Lery> @Misogi : actually "problem management" is the real thing :P
  +
17:25 < cloudii> Yes, all notifications about new project managers should be made on the Administration Contact Page
  +
17:25 < krytyk> problems will define themselves
  +
17:25 <&DarkoNeko> along with a notice on the translation project's talk page
  +
17:25 < krytyk> when they come to supervisor to discuss them
  +
17:25 < krytyk> dont overcomplicate
  +
17:25 < krytyk> over trivialities
  +
17:25 < Misogi> Lery: Ah, nevermind my comment then.
  +
17:26 < Lery> Well, it's a well used word in IT support and so on. It's part of the ITIL stuff and all.
  +
17:26 < cloudii> okay, anyways, staff should at least make contact
  +
17:26 < cloudii> can we agree with that
  +
17:26 < cloudii> and be vague about the form of contact?
  +
17:26 < Lery> @cloudii : yeah
  +
17:26 < Misogi> Yeah.
  +
17:26 < cloudii> vote
  +
17:26 <&DarkoNeko> agreed, the less bureaucracy the better
  +
17:26 < Kira0802> Yea
  +
17:26 < Lery> Please rephrase it for vote
  +
17:27 < Misogi> "Any nomination of a Project Manager must be brought to the supervisors."
  +
17:27 < Misogi> The "brought" can be improved.
  +
17:27 < Lery> "by any means necessary" ? ><
  +
17:27 <&DarkoNeko> lol
  +
17:27 < cloudii> unnecessary lery........
  +
17:27 < Misogi> "Any" means that.
  +
17:27 * Lock giggles
  +
17:28 < Kira0802> teehee
  +
17:28 < Lery> Sartre FTW
  +
17:28 <&DarkoNeko> I think "In case of unannounced inactivity or management issues, the project staff may ask the Supervisor to mediate and/or appoint a new Project Manager amongst the active project members" already says that
  +
17:28 <&DarkoNeko> they have to contact the supervisor in all cases
  +
17:28 < Misogi> It's one case.
  +
17:28 <&DarkoNeko> we could have a page logging all translation rpoject managemenet change, as an aside
  +
17:28 < Misogi> There's also the first one, which is different.
  +
17:28 < Misogi> first nomination*
  +
17:29 <&DarkoNeko> that's always the project or teaser creator
  +
17:29 < Lery> @Misogi : okay, never mind, I thougt we talked about "problem management" but here, you're meaning "problem with the management", right ?
  +
17:29 < cloudii> …what exactly are we talking about right now?
  +
17:30 < Kira0802> Dunno
  +
17:30 < Misogi> I'm a bit lost.
  +
17:30 < Kira0802> I have no idea
  +
17:30 < Kira0802> OK
  +
17:30 <&DarkoNeko> coffee, brb
  +
17:30 < Misogi> Let's go back to the topic.
  +
17:30 < Kira0802> let's just retrace how it goes
  +
17:30 -!- Slayze [[email protected]] has joined #Baka-Tsuki
  +
17:30 < Kira0802> 1. Supervisor away
  +
17:30 < Kira0802> 2. Project nominates a new guy
  +
17:31 < Kira0802> 3. New guy approved by the supervisor
  +
17:31 < cloudii> *Manager you mean
  +
17:31 < cloudii> *Manager away
  +
17:31 < Kira0802> Manager away, OK
  +
17:31 < Kira0802> my bad
  +
17:31 < Misogi> "Supervisors must be informed of any Project Manager appointment."
  +
17:31 < Kira0802> well yeah
  +
17:31 < Kira0802> 3 covers that
  +
17:32 < Kira0802> ...
  +
17:32 < Misogi> Anything else to do?
  +
17:32 < krytyk> makes sense, and first project manager is appointed by supervisor during ATP procedure.
  +
17:32 < Kira0802> Nothing much left
  +
17:33 < cloudii> krytyk +1
  +
17:33 <+Lord-Simon> Well
  +
17:33 <+Lord-Simon> there are the user groups
  +
17:33 <+Lord-Simon> and the removal of people
  +
17:33 < Misogi> Sure.
  +
17:33 <+Lord-Simon> an the creation of new groups
  +
17:33 < krytyk> you mean forums.
  +
17:33 <+Lord-Simon> but for that wee need TLG
  +
17:34 <+Lord-Simon> and he isn't here.
  +
17:34 < Misogi> Let's speak of the Wiki.
  +
17:34 < cloudii> Can we resolve this one point first?
  +
17:34 < cloudii> about the first project manageR?
  +
17:34 < Misogi> ?
  +
17:34 < Kira0802> ?
  +
17:34 < cloudii> how does the first project manager come into being?
  +
17:34 <+Lord-Simon> ?
  +
17:34 < Misogi> Approved along with the ATP.
  +
17:34 < cloudii> do we agree?
  +
17:34 <&DarkoNeko> I say it's the creator
  +
17:34 < cloudii> I disagree with DarkoNeko from practical experience
  +
17:35 <&DarkoNeko> give more details ?
  +
17:35 < Misogi> Well, I do nominate myself as Supervisor and Manager, if the TL is inexperienced.
  +
17:35 < Kira0802> The one who starts
  +
17:35 < krytyk> creator can be the person who made teaser, and only teaser
  +
17:35 < cloudii> ^^
  +
17:35 < Kira0802> Unless he wishes to give it to someone
  +
17:35 < Misogi> Then, I give the Manager post once enough experience is acquired.
  +
17:35 < Misogi> (I can't manage more than 20 projects at once.)
  +
17:36 < krytyk> manager is the person who takes upon himself to continue project, and by putting ATP tag dedicates himself to continue it as a full project
  +
17:36 <+Lord-Simon> ^sounds good
  +
17:36 <+Lord-Simon> actually
  +
17:36 < cloudii> krytyk +1
  +
17:36 < cloudii> krytyk: "first project manager is appointed by supervisor during ATP procedure."
  +
17:36 < hayashi> fair enough
  +
17:37 < Kira0802> i agree
  +
17:37 < cloudii> I vote yes
  +
17:37 < Kira0802> Yea
  +
17:37 < Misogi> I'm on it.
  +
17:37 <+Lord-Simon> Ok
  +
17:37 <+Lord-Simon> then
  +
17:37 <+Lord-Simon> VOTE for: "first project manager is appointed by supervisor during ATP procedure."
  +
17:37 < hayashi> yes
  +
17:37 < cloudii> yes
  +
17:37 < Misogi> Yes.
  +
17:38 < Lock> yes
  +
17:38 <+Lord-Simon> yes
  +
17:38 -!- Xahn [[email protected]] has joined #Baka-Tsuki
  +
17:38 <&DarkoNeko> uuh
  +
17:38 < Kira0802> sup xahn
  +
17:38 < Kira0802> yes
  +
17:38 < Kira0802> what?
  +
17:38 <&DarkoNeko> in all pratically, it's whoever want to continue, the supervisor just nod vaguely. you don't mention the choice comes from the person to begin with ,that may turn off peopel
  +
17:38 < Xahn> yo Kira0802
  +
17:39 < cloudii> "first project manager is approved by the supervisor during ATP procedure."
  +
17:40 < Misogi> It's closer to reality.
  +
17:40 < hayashi> tbh
  +
17:40 < krytyk> usually its only one person at that point
  +
17:40 < cloudii> meh, I'm personally fine with Simon's statement
  +
17:40 < krytyk> since the project has hardly any content.
  +
17:40 < hayashi> this is one area where being grey is fine
  +
17:40 < Kira0802> anyone wants to modify its vote because of the change?
  +
17:40 < hayashi> because managers come and go too fast
  +
17:40 < cloudii> no not really xD I like Simon's better
  +
17:41 < hayashi> if we're too bureaucratic over this issue
  +
17:41 < Kira0802> so...next?
  +
17:41 < cloudii> Can we move to forums?
  +
17:41 < hayashi> it will be counter intinuitive
  +
17:41 < hayashi> yes
  +
17:41 < hayashi> forums
  +
17:41 < cloudii> Okay
  +
17:41 < cloudii> I have one thing
  +
17:41 < Misogi> We can't do much, though.
  +
17:41 < cloudii> for discussion
  +
17:41 <&DarkoNeko> I agree with hayashi there, it's kind of trying to put everything written and... fixating it too much
  +
17:41 < cloudii> Can we discuss which usergroup can have ban/unban privileges?
  +
17:41 < hayashi> SB
  +
17:42 < Kira0802> We can discuss that
  +
17:42 < Misogi> GMs.
  +
17:42 < Kira0802> err
  +
17:42 <+Lord-Simon> Doesn'Twork
  +
17:42 <+Lord-Simon> need TLG
  +
17:42 < Misogi> Of course.
  +
17:42 <&DarkoNeko> for starter, what groups have that currently ?
  +
17:42 < cloudii> we don't need to get it done, but we can give him our opinion and recommendation
  +
17:42 < Misogi> ^
  +
17:42 < Kira0802> It's not like we're modifying it asap, we can just discuss
  +
17:42 < cloudii> no usergroup has ban/unban except Admins
  +
17:42 < Lery> Well Oni should be able to do it too
  +
17:43 < cloudii> and specific named individuals apaprently....
  +
17:43 < krytyk> for forums you mean
  +
17:43 < cloudii> for forums yes
  +
17:43 < Lock> Head translators maybe?
  +
17:43 < hayashi> no
  +
17:43 < Kira0802> let's clarify 1st
  +
17:43 < hayashi> we don't need that power tbh
  +
17:43 < krytyk> please make sure to state clearly whether you mean forums or wiki whenever mentinoning usergroups and rights, thanks.
  +
17:43 < Kira0802> forums/wiki?
  +
17:43 < cloudii> Forums.
  +
17:43 < hayashi> I'm assuming forums
  +
17:43 <&DarkoNeko> maybe we need a patrol group for countering vandalism
  +
17:43 < Kira0802> ok, forums.
  +
17:43 < hayashi> head tls mod threads and stuff
  +
17:43 < cloudii> We do have a patrol group for vandalism
  +
17:43 < hayashi> ban/unban should be with admin level mods
  +
17:44 < hayashi> the SB
  +
17:44 < Kira0802> Give ban rights to FSB
  +
17:44 < Misogi> Global Moderators, Admins and some nominated people got the ban powers.
  +
17:44 < cloudii> @Misogi, that's the current state?
  +
17:44 < Misogi> The FSB used to have them, but it was removed.
  +
17:44 < Misogi> It seems so. But it's unclear.
  +
17:44 <&DarkoNeko> there's no "global mod"... you're talking about the forums ?
  +
17:44 * DarkoNeko is out
  +
17:44 < Kira0802> yes
  +
17:44 <&DarkoNeko> I'll go bike outside or something
  +
17:45 < Kira0802> no
  +
17:45 < Kira0802> u stay here
  +
17:45 < Kira0802> ;_;
  +
17:45 <&DarkoNeko> but it's warm outside ;è;
  +
17:45 <&DarkoNeko> you just have to add the votes on http://www.baka-tsuki.org/project/index.php?title=Talk:Meeting:March302014
  +
17:45 < Kira0802> it's snowing here
  +
17:45 <+Lord-Simon> it should be almost 9 am where TLG is
  +
17:45 < hayashi> maybe he forgot
  +
17:45 <&DarkoNeko> it's sunday, i woke up like at midday
  +
17:45 <+Lord-Simon> I've written a mail
  +
17:45 < Kira0802> prob overslept
  +
17:46 < cloudii> Probably sleeping in....
  +
17:46 <+Lord-Simon> to him
  +
17:46 < cloudii> are we continuing with the ban/unban issue?
  +
17:46 < Kira0802> maybe wrong server lol
  +
17:46 -!- wet [[email protected]] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
  +
17:46 <+Lord-Simon> nah
  +
17:46 < cloudii> cool
  +
17:47 < cloudii> I'm going to get going, unless DarkoNeko wants to talk about sidebar
  +
17:47 < cloudii> and main page
  +
17:47 -!- wet [[email protected]] has joined #Baka-Tsuki
  +
17:47 < Misogi> I'll add the ATP and 1st Manager thing.
  +
17:47 < Kira0802> i'm out fow awhile
  +
17:47 < Kira0802> bbl
  +
17:47 <+Lord-Simon> so, this is it. For now
  +
17:47 < cloudii> DarkoNeko: You might be interested in this main page proposal
  +
17:47 < cloudii> http://www.baka-tsuki.org/project/index.php?title=User:Pumkingboyz/Sandbox:Main_page_proposal
  +
17:47 < Misogi> In "Project leading and supervision"
  +
17:47 <&DarkoNeko> cloudii, the only point of choice is wether to use the old method or your discovery, a'd be for the later
  +
17:48 < cloudii> I don't really care xD
  +
17:48 -!- AthenaSoCute [[email protected]] has joined #Baka-Tsuki
  +
17:48 < krytyk> what
  +
17:48 < krytyk> whos that
  +
17:48 < AthenaSoCute> kira
  +
17:48 < hayashi> botanophile 2
  +
17:49 < cloudii> but, I'm kind of tired of deliberations at this point…. was running interviews for 5 hours yesterday so…. cloud is wiped out xD
  +
17:49 < cloudii> had to pick an E-board for next year at school
  +
17:49 < cloudii> but anyways, cloud is off. see y'all
  +
17:49 < AthenaSoCute> ...
  +
17:49 < AthenaSoCute> if cloud is off
  +
17:49 < AthenaSoCute> should we ebd this for now?
  +
17:49 < AthenaSoCute> rnd*
  +
17:50 <&DarkoNeko> alright, so we're calling the meeting off ?
  +
17:50 < Lery> See you Cloudii, may you have a sunny day ;)
  +
17:50 < AthenaSoCute> end*
  +
17:50 <&DarkoNeko> I'm out biking \o/
  +
17:50 < AthenaSoCute> we can meet next week or something
  +
17:50 < Lery> yeah I'm tired of this too
  +
17:50 < Lery> Sure
  +
17:50 <&DarkoNeko> thanks, everyone
  +
17:50 < cloudii> thanks 'errybody
  +
17:50 <+Lord-Simon> So, looks like the meeting is off for today
  +
</nowiki>
  +
</pre>
  +
|}

Revision as of 18:53, 30 March 2014


Meeting started

Clarify Ambiguous (outdated) Baka-Tsuki guidelines.

"is the one week requirement to complete a new chapter

choice 1) keep it 2) extend it to a month 3) remove it

<Kira0802> 3.
<Vallor> 2/3
<stellarroze> 2.
<krytyk> 1
<Misogi> 3
<Lery> 3
<cloudii> 3
<Lord-Simon> 3
<Darkoneko> 3

Majority to remove it.

consensus seems to expect a new project to already have material ready (like a prologue/intro already translated), rather than start from zero DarkoNeko talk 08:40, 30 March 2014 (CDT)

teaser status / ATP

random questions during chat mode (to complete)

  • Should teasers be an intermediate step in the creation of a project ?
  • What about teasers where the translator know already that (s)he'll be too busy to continue (and made than in hope another translator picks the project up) ?
  • Translators often tag something as a project in hope to get it to the side bar/categories and give it visibility
  • Every project seems to start by being tagged as a teaser for some reason (misuse ?)


Vote of new modus operandi :

1). Teaser tag is the default tag to be put on new project
2). When the teaser reaches the requirements for full project, translator tags Pending
3). Oni/DarkoNeko/Vaelis (or other supervisor) approves
<Kira0802> Yea
<cloudii> Yes
<Cthaeh> yes
<krytyk> yes
<rock96> Yep
<hayashi> yes
<stellarroze> yes
<Code-Zero> yes
<Vallor> Yes but what's happened to the deadline?
<Misogi> Yes (although the Alt. Languages situation should be clarified).
<DarkoNeko> yes
<Lery> yes
<Lord-Simon> yes

mailing supervisors

<cloudii> There are number of instances int he rules
<cloudii> that require members to "email" supervisors
<cloudii> ...
<cloudii> Remove all references thereof 
<cloudii> of that form of contact


Vote : everyone approve

Creating a wiki page for requests

" Create a single location on the Wiki where administrative requests can be made. This should be at location that all sysops/supervisors monitor."


(like on wikipedia)

vote :

<+Lord-Simon> yes
<Misogi> Yes.
<cloudii> yes
<Kira0802> Yea
<rock96> Yes.
<&DarkoNeko> agreed
<krytyk> y
<Lery> yes
<hayashi> yes

remove Wiki rules on forums

"rules about the forum should be on the forum, but rules about the wiki are also on the forum. They should be moved to the wiki"

Vote : everyone agrees

Create comprehensive Help Pages to improve the experience of brand-new members.

vote : all approve.

Detail of content of saide pages to be discussed séparatly

inactivity

Inactive people in power group issues :

  • Risk of accounts being hacked
  • Risks of people asking long-time inactive members to do stuff and never get answers.
  • cluttering of said groups


Motion :

<cloudii> 1). One year of inactivty = loss of physical wiki rights
<cloudii> 2). If you end up coming back, talk to a sysop to be reinstated

Vote :

<Kira0802> Yea
<Cthaeh> vote yes
<rock96> yes
<Lery> yes
<hayashi> mondai nai
<krytyk> y
<&DarkoNeko> vote y
<Vallor> yes
<victorrama> Yea
<+Lord-Simon> yes, even if I'm sceptical

project leading and supervisions

Renaming of some of the roles for a project, for clarity

 "Project Supervisor -> Project Manager (usually one of the translators or editors. Does not need to be a member of a particular power user group)"
 "Project Administrator -> Supervisor (wiki supervisor or above)"
<cloudii> Yes
<krytyk> yes
<Kira0802> Yea
<Vallor> Yeah
<Misogi> Yes (although I may not count)
<Lery> yes
<Cthaeh> yes, vote
<&DarkoNeko> i'd have preferred "translation project manager" for clarity, but I'll take that
<rock96> 'K, I think

Vote : approved

Project Manager

"If a project manager knows they'll be away for a while, they should designate a subtitute to take all decisions in their absence"

Vote : all agreed.


"In case of unannounced inactivity or management issues, the project staff may ask the Supervisor to mediate and/or appoint a new Project Manager amongst the active project members"

Vote : approved.


"The first Project Manager is appointed by the Supervisor during ATP procedure."

Vote : approved.

x

x

x

x

x

x

Complete Log of the Meeting