Difference between revisions of "User talk:Sage"

From Baka-Tsuki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(explanation of partial reverts)
 
Line 16: Line 16:
   
 
--[[User:BlckKnght|BlckKnght]] 13:23, 30 May 2006 (PDT)
 
--[[User:BlckKnght|BlckKnght]] 13:23, 30 May 2006 (PDT)
  +
  +
No problem. I'm no book editor. ;) I was reading the first chapter and thought a few things seemed out of place and could use a bit of touch-up. And of course with Wiki, if you don't want your work to be edited, don't edit.
  +
  +
Thanks for your post though it's always kind of someone to say why they did things and not flame you for trying to help.

Revision as of 00:58, 31 May 2006

Hi Sage,

I just made a few monster edits to Suzumiya Haruhi:Volume1 Chapter1 which included reverting several of the changes you had made in your recent edits.

You made two separate edits to change "introduction was" to "intruductions were". I changed it back, as I think Kyon is referring to Haruhi's introduction, not all the introductions by the class. Perhaps my understanding is wrong though.

You added a paranthetical note saying which classroom the guys in Kyon's class moved into, but I took it out again. The two classes are described pretty clearly earlier in the paragraph and Kyon's class is identified explicitly. I think it can be left to the reader to know what "the other room" would be.

One phrasing I did not change: Frankly, topics like what dreams people have or how amazing or cute someone's pet is are, in my book, some of the dullest topics in the world.

The "is are" construction in the middle of that sentance is really awkward, even if it is technically grammatical. The original transation is quite similar to what you put, and another editor had changed it to try to avoid the "is are". Since I really don't understand the purpose of the sentance in context I've left it for now. See the talk page.

You made a quotation out of "Taniguchi, you look like a total moron with that expression of yours!" which was previously an internal dialog. I've reverted that as per the format guidlines.

Anyway, there were lots of other changes you made that were good, so I hope you won't be upest that I've undone a few of them. Welcome to the project!

--BlckKnght 13:23, 30 May 2006 (PDT)

No problem. I'm no book editor. ;) I was reading the first chapter and thought a few things seemed out of place and could use a bit of touch-up. And of course with Wiki, if you don't want your work to be edited, don't edit.

Thanks for your post though it's always kind of someone to say why they did things and not flame you for trying to help.