Difference between revisions of "Talk:Horizon:Volume 3C Chapter 86"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "@Max27 I'm not so sure that 27 kilometers isn't correct. That's not quite 17 miles, which is not out of the question for visual contact on a moonlit night at altitude. 2700...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
@Max27 I'm not so sure that 27 kilometers isn't correct. That's not quite 17 miles, which is not out of the question for visual contact on a moonlit night at altitude. 2700 meters would be not quite 2 miles, which would be practically on top of them. I don't have access to the original work so I won't revert the change, but someone who does should check it. [[User:Txtracer|Txtracer]] ([[User talk:Txtracer|talk]]) 03:10, 15 August 2015 (UTC) |
@Max27 I'm not so sure that 27 kilometers isn't correct. That's not quite 17 miles, which is not out of the question for visual contact on a moonlit night at altitude. 2700 meters would be not quite 2 miles, which would be practically on top of them. I don't have access to the original work so I won't revert the change, but someone who does should check it. [[User:Txtracer|Txtracer]] ([[User talk:Txtracer|talk]]) 03:10, 15 August 2015 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | @Txtracer The Ziz-class are between 912 and 2916 meters, so I'm thinking he just mistook one digit. --[[User:Max27|Max27]] ([[User talk:Max27|talk]]) 15:13, 15 August 2015 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 17:13, 15 August 2015
@Max27 I'm not so sure that 27 kilometers isn't correct. That's not quite 17 miles, which is not out of the question for visual contact on a moonlit night at altitude. 2700 meters would be not quite 2 miles, which would be practically on top of them. I don't have access to the original work so I won't revert the change, but someone who does should check it. Txtracer (talk) 03:10, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
@Txtracer The Ziz-class are between 912 and 2916 meters, so I'm thinking he just mistook one digit. --Max27 (talk) 15:13, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
