Difference between revisions of "Talk:Rakuin no Monshou:Volume1 Chapter2"

From Baka-Tsuki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 20: Line 20:
 
What was called the Mephius Empire, ... The Domick Flats that cut diagonally through the mountains was currently all of its territory.
 
What was called the Mephius Empire, ... The Domick Flats that cut diagonally through the mountains was currently all of its territory.
 
::-"all of its territory" makes it sound like the Domick Flats are Mephius's only territory; I think they're just part of Mephius's territory. If so, I suggest deleting the 'of' to make it "were all currently its territory"
 
::-"all of its territory" makes it sound like the Domick Flats are Mephius's only territory; I think they're just part of Mephius's territory. If so, I suggest deleting the 'of' to make it "were all currently its territory"
::*Actually, I've read this part as the Domick flats being 'All of their territory', but you may be right that it could mean 'fully in their territory', especially when looking at the maps in later volumes. I'll ask about it on the forum, because I'm not so sure right now. --[[User:Dohma|Dohma]] ([[User talk:Dohma|talk]]) 09:50, 1 May 2013 (CDT)
+
::*Actually, I've read this part as the Domick flats being 'All of their territory', but you may be right that it could mean 'fully in their territory', especially when looking at the maps in later volumes. I'll ask about it on the forum, because I'm not so sure right now. '''[EDIT]''': checked it with EEE who sometimes proofreads, and he agrees it's 'all of its territory'. --[[User:Dohma|Dohma]] ([[User talk:Dohma|talk]]) 09:50, 1 May 2013 (CDT)
   
 
It reminded him of oozing wet fuse.
 
It reminded him of oozing wet fuse.
Line 28: Line 28:
 
‘Until the neck of the Garberran is presented before me
 
‘Until the neck of the Garberran is presented before me
 
::-It's not necessarily wrong as is, but I was wondering if it should be "Garberan king". Also, I'll take this chance to ask whether you prefer 'Garberran' or 'Garberan'? The first is what you've used most recently in chapter 3, but the second has more total usages between all the chapters.
 
::-It's not necessarily wrong as is, but I was wondering if it should be "Garberan king". Also, I'll take this chance to ask whether you prefer 'Garberran' or 'Garberan'? The first is what you've used most recently in chapter 3, but the second has more total usages between all the chapters.
::*I actually made it up, because the Japanese just add の to everything to make it possessive, and I didn't want to say 'people of Garbera' all the time. The country is pronounced 'Gar-buh-rah' but I thought 'Gar-bèr-ruhn' sounded better than 'Gar-buh-rahn'. So I prefer Garberran, but I don't know if that sounds strange or anything. And yes, it's supposed to be Garberran king - I've changed it. --[[User:Dohma|Dohma]] ([[User talk:Dohma|talk]]) 09:50, 1 May 2013 (CDT)
+
::*I actually made it up, because the Japanese just add の to everything to make it possessive, and I didn't want to say 'people of Garbera' all the time. Actually, I didn't know I used both styles - I actually thought Garberran sounded better, but Garberan is probably closer to the original pronunciation so I'll stick with that. And yes, it's supposed to be 'king' - I've changed it. --[[User:Dohma|Dohma]] ([[User talk:Dohma|talk]]) 09:50, 1 May 2013 (CDT)
   
   

Revision as of 21:11, 1 May 2013

So what's up with this "dissonance" word in the second sentence? Is it something along the lines of regret or self-conflict? Needs further translation. Rizo536 - Possibly Editing (talk)

The word used is 葛藤, which means 'conflict' or 'complications'. Basically what it means here is that he doesn't have any difficulties with stealing. Or as you stated yourself, self-conflict. But you're right about it sounding a bit strange, so I'll change it. Thanks for the comment. --Dohma (talk) 03:38, 16 April 2013 (CDT)

Everything – although, with a life barely managing to live another day, despite only having such a minimal lifeline, contrarily, if all their members were being suppressed, they could as well be left for dead.

-The wording here was a little confusing. I'm not sure if there are one or two concepts this is intended to express. The one concept I'm not sure about is that even though "everything" was taken from them, losing "everything" wasn't actually losing that much since they were living day to day ("with a minimal lifeline").
-The second concept I'm pretty sure is there is that if there members were injured or "suppressed" they wouldn't be able to support themselves in their day to day living, and might as well be left for dead. If there are two concepts in that sentence, then I think this second concept might be clearer as it's own sentence.
  • It's mainly the latter. The sentence is a bit hard to figure out, what I get from it is this: They lost everything, and although they (already) had a harsh life, if they would be cut off (suppressed) by their rivals, all of their members would practically be left for dead (lit. left dying on the plains). I'm just not sure about the 'already' part, the author never uses that phrase. I've changed the sentence though, so that it's not as confusing anymore. --Dohma (talk) 09:50, 1 May 2013 (CDT)

Although he certainly was the kind of person to use physical strength, for there were also about a hundred verbal disputes, and mostly settle things quickly with his fists, at the same time, rather than spending the nights with his friends, drinking alcohol, making a racket, getting in high spirits, and chattering, he was also the type to keep to his own, propping up his knees in a dim corner of the room, and be lost in thought.

-I think this sentence would be clearer if it was broken up into two sentences, and possibly some clauses rearranged. Also, the one thing that was confusing to me is that "for there were also about a hundred verbal disputes" is sandwiched between two statements about physical violence. I wasn't sure if it was supposed to mean those disputes were ultimately settled with fists, or that in addition to settling things with fists, there were also 'about a hundred' disputes that were settled verbally.
  • There were a lot of verbal disputes, and Orba usually resorted with violence (physical strength). In Japanese sentence order that clause is indeed sandwiched, but I've put that part in front now. I'm not sure how to break the sentence in two, because it's all one contrast: "He's the type to use violence, but also keep to himself", but I gave it a try. --Dohma (talk) 09:50, 1 May 2013 (CDT)

“Bastard!” an armed swordsman said, about to beat Orba up, when, with only the word “Stop”, the man took, grinning with his lips buried in his beard.

-"the man took" seems out of place. Should it be 'the man stopped'?
  • "took control", just a result of rushed typing I think. But that still sounds a bit strange, so I changed the sentence a bit. --Dohma (talk) 09:50, 1 May 2013 (CDT)

What was called the Mephius Empire, ... The Domick Flats that cut diagonally through the mountains was currently all of its territory.

-"all of its territory" makes it sound like the Domick Flats are Mephius's only territory; I think they're just part of Mephius's territory. If so, I suggest deleting the 'of' to make it "were all currently its territory"
  • Actually, I've read this part as the Domick flats being 'All of their territory', but you may be right that it could mean 'fully in their territory', especially when looking at the maps in later volumes. I'll ask about it on the forum, because I'm not so sure right now. [EDIT]: checked it with EEE who sometimes proofreads, and he agrees it's 'all of its territory'. --Dohma (talk) 09:50, 1 May 2013 (CDT)

It reminded him of oozing wet fuse.

-It probably needs "an" in there. The reason I didn't fix something so trivial myself was that "oozing wet fuse" just sounded strange to me. If 'oozing' is meant to mean very wet ('dripping' or nothing would have been my first choice), then that's just a matter of personal preference and it doesn't matter that much, but I wasn't sure if I was missing something.
  • The author literally uses じくじく, which is a sound-effect-like adjective. Dictionaries say 'oozily' (I doubt that's even a word) or 'so wet that it's oozing'. But I agree that dripping sounds better, so I'll use that. --Dohma (talk) 09:50, 1 May 2013 (CDT)

‘Until the neck of the Garberran is presented before me

-It's not necessarily wrong as is, but I was wondering if it should be "Garberan king". Also, I'll take this chance to ask whether you prefer 'Garberran' or 'Garberan'? The first is what you've used most recently in chapter 3, but the second has more total usages between all the chapters.
  • I actually made it up, because the Japanese just add の to everything to make it possessive, and I didn't want to say 'people of Garbera' all the time. Actually, I didn't know I used both styles - I actually thought Garberran sounded better, but Garberan is probably closer to the original pronunciation so I'll stick with that. And yes, it's supposed to be 'king' - I've changed it. --Dohma (talk) 09:50, 1 May 2013 (CDT)


Once again, a few sentences I noticed when reading. Thanks as always. --Cthaeh (talk) 22:30, 27 April 2013 (CDT)